Loading…

Honeywell TechnologiesHONCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Industrials›Industrial Machinery

Diversified industrial company making aerospace systems, building technologies, performance materials and safety products.

Momentum neutral 50
Mkt cap
$69.8B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$621M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
23.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+5.8 pp
WACC 8.3%
Hurdle
+1 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BBB+ / A+
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
90 days
4 Feb 2027
Close · USD$220.05
1D+2.0%
1W+0.8%
1M+6.5%
3M-9.4%
6M-1.0%
YTD+8.7%
1Y+8.2%
ATR %2.9%
Beta0.76
52w lowhigh15.0% off high

What Honeywell Technologies does

Diversified industrial company making aerospace systems, building technologies, performance materials and safety products.

Sells equipment and software, then earns repeat income on service, spares and upgrades on its installed base in aircraft and buildings. In 2025 it began splitting into separate companies, starting with advanced materials as Solstice, with aerospace the other planned separation.

Products and services

  • Aerospace Technologies
  • Building Automation
  • Energy & Sustainability Solutions
  • Industrial Automation

Customers

  • Aerospace/defense OEMs & airlines
  • Commercial building owners
  • Industrial/chemical manufacturers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrial conglomerate
  • Diversified industrial manufacturing
  • Distribution to…

What could go right

  • Aerospace build-rate recovery
  • Industrial automation/energy transition demand

What could go wrong

  • Portfolio-separation execution risk
  • Industrial capex cyclicality

Moat: narrow (IP / patents, installed base, scale). Broad patent portfolio and large installed base across aerospace, building and industrial niches.

Headquarters: Charlotte, North Carolina, US · Founded: 1906 · Employees: 101,000

Named competitors

Honeywell Technologies at a glance

Size Honeywell Technologies (HON) is a United States Industrials company (Industrial Machinery) with a market value of $69.8B, the 193rd largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $220.05 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 1.0%, against -2.6% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 10th highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 17.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.5%); the operating margin is 18.0% (peer median 18.0%).

Valuation It trades at 23.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 22.0× (10th most expensive of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +3%, so the hurdle is +1 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 5.8 points above its cost of capital (8.3% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $18.8B at 30 Sep 2026, down 52% on a year earlier — 0.6 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Credit Honeywell Technologies has 31 bonds outstanding ($27.5B), rated BBB+ by the agencies and trading like A+ at a weighted spread of 67 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 2.3% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 4 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026HON 96Peer median 96
Six months, rebased to 100: Honeywell Technologies against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Honeywell Technologies financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$33.6B$37.4B$34.7B$36.6B$35.5B
Revenue growth—+8%-5%+3%—
Gross profit$12.9B$14.3B$13.5B$14.3B$13.6B
EBITDA$7.12B$8.60B$8.04B$9.05B$8.44B
Net income$7.46B$4.73B$5.71B$5.66B$4.97B
Free cash flow$1.52B$5.42B$5.23B$4.30B$4.51B
Capital expenditure$427M$986M$871M$1.04B$766M
Total debt$17.2B$35.6B$32.1B$21.5B$20.5B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Honeywell Technologies competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%-50%-25%0%+25%002371JCIATCO-ATTCARRPH6367SCHN6501688012300502ASMIR6954VLTODOVXYLHON6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Honeywell Technologies is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%20×40×60×002371JCIATCO-ATTCARRSCHN688012300502ASM000651DOVHONRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Honeywell Technologies is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%0%25%50%002371JCIATCO-ATTCARR6367SCHN688012300502ASM000651XYLHONGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Honeywell Technologies is the large dot.

Honeywell Technologies competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (HON vs MMM vs GE vs EMR)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Honeywell Technologies HON$69.8B-1%-17%18%23.2×4.1%
3M MMM$95.7B+30%+2%21%19.2×11.3%
GE Aerospace GE$334B+9%+20%18%36.4×27.6%
Emerson Electric EMR$90.6B+15%+5%21%22.3×19.9%

How Honeywell Technologies compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Honeywell Technologies against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureHONPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+6.5%-5.6%5th highest of 21
6-month return-1.0%-2.6%10th highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-15.0%-19.2%7th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-17.4%+8.5%lowest of 21
Operating margin18.0%18.0%11th highest of 21
Forward P/E23.2×22.0×10th most expensive of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)4.1%16.9%3rd least demanding of 20
Growth delivered (Del g)+2.8%+10.9%4th lowest of 20
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+1.3 pp+3.5 pp7th least demanding of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital+5.8 pp+5.3 pp10th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA11.4×17.2×3rd cheapest of 16
Net debt / EBITDA1.6×0.7×4th most indebted of 17
Bond spread67 bp75 bp3rd tightest of 11

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Honeywell Technologies HONUnited States$69.8B-1%-17%18%23.2×4.1%+2.8%
NAURA Technology 002371.SZChina$60.6B+4%+18%11%56.5×33.4%+45.5%
Johnson Controls JCIUnited States$81.8B-3%+9%16%21.3×17.8%+1.6%
Atlas Copco ATCO-A.STSweden$87.5B+4%+3%20%29.7×17.7%+11.0%
Trane Technologies TTUnited States$87.9B-14%+10%18%23.4×14.7%+11.4%
Carrier Global CARRUnited States$42.9B-22%+3%9%17.2×19.0%+4.5%
Parker Hannifin PHUnited States$116B+4%+8%22%24.4×19.0%+8.4%
Daikin Industries 6367.TJapan$40.4B-1%+11%8%21.8×7.4%+15.0%
Yushu Technology 688836.SSChina$39.8Bn/a+333%19%n/an/an/a
Schindler SCHN.SWSwitzerland$39.4B+17%-3%13%28.2×2.3%+0.6%
Hitachi 6501.TJapan$130B-7%+14%12%20.9×9.5%+3.9%
Advanced Micro-Fabrication Equipment Inc. China 688012.SSChina$36.5B+1%+26%12%51.5×51.7%+40.3%
Eoptolink Technology 300502.SZChina$36.0B-54%+101%44%12.3×21.7%+65.5%
ASM International ASM.ASNetherlands$35.5B-28%+13%31%27.0×30.0%+19.0%
Ingersoll Rand IRUnited States$31.9B+10%+8%19%21.8×17.3%+14.0%
Gree Electric Appliances, Inc. of Zhuhai 000651.SZChina$31.2B-3%-11%16%8.6×-16.4%0.0%
Fanuc 6954.TJapan$31.2B-23%+13%23%22.0×16.9%+9.2%
Veralto VLTOUnited States$28.5B+35%+6%22%24.6×8.3%+4.8%
Dover DOVUnited States$27.1B-7%+8%18%17.6×12.2%+3.9%
Alfa Laval ALFA.STSweden$22.5B0%+4%18%24.2×7.9%+10.9%
Xylem XYLUnited States$22.4B-14%+2%16%17.4×12.1%+13.1%

Honeywell Technologies bonds and credit

Honeywell Technologies has 31 bonds outstanding with $27.5B face value. The agencies rate it BBB+; its bonds trade like A+. Weighted yield 5.34%, a spread of 67 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Honeywell Technologies backlog

Honeywell Technologies reported $18.8B of remaining performance obligations at 30 Sep 2026, down 52% from a year earlier and down 51% from the previous quarter. That is 0.6 years of trailing revenue already under contract. Book-to-bill last quarter: -2.85.

Questions

Who are Honeywell Technologies's main competitors?
Named competitors: 3M (MMM), General Electric/GE Aerospace (GE), Emerson Electric (EMR). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes NAURA Technology (002371.SZ), Johnson Controls (JCI), Atlas Copco (ATCO-A.ST), Trane Technologies (TT), Carrier Global (CARR), Parker Hannifin (PH).
Is Honeywell Technologies expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 23.2× against a peer median of 22.0×, 10th most expensive of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +3%, so the hurdle is +1 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Honeywell Technologies stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -1.0% against -2.6% for the median peer; over one year +8.2%.
What is Honeywell Technologies's backlog?
Honeywell Technologies's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $18.8B at 30 Sep 2026, -52% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.