Loading…

VeraltoVLTOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Industrials›Industrial Machinery

Makes water quality testing instruments (Hach) and product identification/marking systems (Videojet), spun off from Danaher.

Momentum leader 93
Mkt cap
$28.5B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$232M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
24.6×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+15.0 pp
WACC 7.9%
Hurdle
+3 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BBB / BBB+
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
95 days
9 Feb 2027
Close · USD$117.09
1D+0.5%
1W+5.4%
1M+21.4%
3M+20.6%
6M+35.0%
YTD+17.7%
1Y+17.7%
ATR %2.5%
Beta0.18
52w lowhigh1.6% off high

What Veralto does

Makes water quality testing instruments (Hach) and product identification/marking systems (Videojet), spun off from Danaher.

Sells analytical instruments and marking equipment, then keeps earning from the consumables, test reagents and service contracts those installed machines need over their working life, so the water and marking businesses together carry the company. Separated from Danaher in 2023 and now runs as an independent group with its own costs.

Products and services

  • Water quality analytics (Hach)
  • Product identification/marking (Videojet)
  • Packaging/color solutions (Esko, X-Rite)

Customers

  • Municipal water utilities
  • Industrial/food & beverage manufacturers
  • Consumer packaged goods companies

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrial machinery / instrumentation
  • Water quality & product ID…
  • Consumables & service for installed…

What could go right

  • Water quality regulation driving testing demand
  • Consumables/recurring revenue growth from installed base

What could go wrong

  • Industrial/CPG capex cyclicality
  • Integration risk post-spinoff standalone costs

Moat: narrow (installed base, switching costs, brand). Instrument installed base drives recurring high-margin consumables and service revenue, a classic Danaher-style model.

Headquarters: Waltham, Massachusetts, US · Founded: 2023 · Employees: 17,000

Named competitors

Veralto at a glance

Size Veralto (VLTO) is a United States Industrials company (Industrial Machinery) with a market value of $28.5B, the 382nd largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $117.09 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 35.0%, against -11.2% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 6.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.1%); the operating margin is 21.9% (peer median 18.1%).

Valuation It trades at 24.6× forward earnings against a peer median of 23.7× (8th most expensive of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +5%, so the hurdle is +3 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 15.0 points above its cost of capital (7.9% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $340M at 2 Oct 2026, up 6% on a year earlier — 0.1 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Credit Veralto has 3 bonds outstanding ($2.12B), rated BBB by the agencies and trading like BBB+ at a weighted spread of 72 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 2.5% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 9 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026VLTO 135Peer median 88
Six months, rebased to 100: Veralto against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Veralto financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$5.80B$5.50B$5.19B$5.02B$4.87B
Revenue growth—+6%+3%+3%—
Gross profit$3.44B$3.26B$3.07B$2.85B$2.71B
EBITDA$1.37B$1.35B$1.29B$1.24B$1.21B
Net income$1.00B$940M$833M$839M$845M
Free cash flow$1.09B$1.01B$820M$909M$836M
Capital expenditure$63.0M$63.0M$55.0M$54.0M$34.0M
Total debt$2.92B$2.88B$2.77B$2.78B$123M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Veralto competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%-50%-25%0%+25%DOV6954000651IRASM300502ALFAXYLSYM6880126273002050SCHNVACNWWDNDSNIEXVLTO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Veralto is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%50×100×DOV6954000651ASM300502XYLSYM6880126273002050SCHNVACNWWDVLTORevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Veralto is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%0%25%50%DOV6954000651IRASM300502ALFAXYL688012002050SCHNVACNNDSNVLTOGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Veralto is the large dot.

Veralto competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (VLTO vs XYL vs TMO vs MTD)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Veralto VLTO$28.5B+35%+6%22%24.6×8.3%
Xylem XYL$22.4B-14%+2%16%17.4×12.1%
Thermo Fisher Scientific TMO$257B+50%+8%19%25.8×20.9%
Mettler Toledo MTD$34.5B+53%+7%28%33.9×20.3%
Horiba 6856.T$4.79B-17%+12%17%14.4×11.2%

How Veralto compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Veralto against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureVLTOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+21.4%-4.6%2nd highest of 21
6-month return+35.0%-11.2%highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-1.6%-30.7%2nd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+6.4%+8.1%8th lowest of 21
Operating margin21.9%18.1%7th highest of 21
Forward P/E24.6×23.7×8th most expensive of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)8.3%16.6%5th least demanding of 19
Growth delivered (Del g)+4.8%+9.2%5th lowest of 19
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+3.5 pp+7.0 pp9th least demanding of 19
ROIC minus cost of capital+15.0 pp+3.7 pp3rd highest of 20
EV / EBITDA21.6×16.6×3rd most expensive of 15
Net debt / EBITDA0.8×0.8×9th least indebted of 17
Bond spread72 bp76 bptightest of 8

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Veralto VLTOUnited States$28.5B+35%+6%22%24.6×8.3%+4.8%
Dover DOVUnited States$27.1B-7%+8%18%17.6×12.2%+3.9%
Fanuc 6954.TJapan$31.2B-23%+13%23%22.0×16.9%+9.2%
Gree Electric Appliances, Inc. of Zhuhai 000651.SZChina$31.2B-3%-11%16%8.6×-16.4%0.0%
Ingersoll Rand IRUnited States$31.9B+10%+8%19%21.8×17.3%+14.0%
ASM International ASM.ASNetherlands$35.5B-28%+13%31%27.0×30.0%+19.0%
Eoptolink Technology 300502.SZChina$36.0B-54%+101%44%12.3×21.7%+65.5%
Alfa Laval ALFA.STSweden$22.5B0%+4%18%24.2×7.9%+10.9%
Xylem XYLUnited States$22.4B-14%+2%16%17.4×12.1%+13.1%
SYM SYMUnited States$22.3B-30%+20%1%101.9×n/an/a
Advanced Micro-Fabrication Equipment Inc. China 688012.SSChina$36.5B+1%+26%12%51.5×51.7%+40.3%
Smc 6273.TJapan$21.9B-27%+16%24%15.9×16.2%+8.8%
Zhejiang Sanhua Intelligent Controls 002050.SZChina$21.5B-28%+3%15%33.3×23.8%+20.8%
Schindler SCHN.SWSwitzerland$39.4B+17%-3%13%28.2×2.3%+0.6%
Yushu Technology 688836.SSChina$39.8Bn/a+333%19%n/an/an/a
Daikin Industries 6367.TJapan$40.4B-1%+11%8%21.8×7.4%+15.0%
VAT VACN.SWSwitzerland$19.0B-11%-2%25%48.2×25.8%+9.2%
Carrier Global CARRUnited States$42.9B-22%+3%9%17.2×19.0%+4.5%
Woodward WWDUnited States$18.7B-14%+22%16%31.0×18.9%+7.4%
Nordson NDSNUnited States$17.3B+10%+7%27%24.5×15.4%+5.6%
IDEX IEXUnited States$16.7B+5%+7%21%23.7×14.7%+8.0%

Veralto bonds and credit

Veralto has 3 bonds outstanding with $2.12B face value. The agencies rate it BBB; its bonds trade like BBB+. Weighted yield 5.30%, a spread of 72 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Veralto backlog

Veralto reported $340M of remaining performance obligations at 2 Oct 2026, up 6% from a year earlier and down 4% from the previous quarter. That is 0.1 years of trailing revenue already under contract. Book-to-bill last quarter: 0.99.

Questions

Who are Veralto's main competitors?
Named competitors: Xylem (XYL), Domino Printing (Brother) (private or unlisted), Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO), Mettler-Toledo (MTD), Horiba (6856.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Dover (DOV), Fanuc (6954.T), Gree Electric Appliances, Inc. of Zhuhai (000651.SZ), Ingersoll Rand (IR), ASM International (ASM.AS), Eoptolink Technology (300502.SZ).
Is Veralto expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 24.6× against a peer median of 23.7×, 8th most expensive of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +5%, so the hurdle is +3 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Veralto stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +35.0% against -11.2% for the median peer; over one year +17.7%.
What is Veralto's backlog?
Veralto's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $340M at 2 Oct 2026, +6% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.