Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › VACN.SW VAT Group AGOpen in the cockpit ↗

VAT Group AGVACN.SWCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Switzerland · CHF·Industrials›Industrial Machinery

Swiss maker of high-precision vacuum valves used in semiconductor and display manufacturing equipment.

≈ A Swiss niche semiconductor component supplier, no direct large US peerMomentum laggard 2
Mkt cap
$19.0B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
90%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$66.6M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
48.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+14.6 pp
WACC 6.4%
Hurdle
+17 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
116 days
2 Mar 2027
Close · CHFCHF 516.60
1D-0.9%
1W-9.2%
1M-23.4%
3M-18.1%
6M-11.2%
YTD+33.9%
1Y+56.0%
ATR %4.7%
52w lowhigh29.0% off high

What VAT does

Swiss maker of high-precision vacuum valves used in semiconductor and display manufacturing equipment.

Its valves are designed into the vacuum chambers of chipmaking tools built by a handful of equipment makers, so sales follow those makers' orders and factory-building cycles. Service and replacement of valves already installed in fabs add a steadier layer.

In one line: A Swiss niche semiconductor component supplier, no direct large US peer.

Products and services

  • Vacuum valves (semiconductor fabs)
  • Vacuum valves (display/solar/industrial)
  • Global service/spares

Customers

  • Applied Materials
  • Lam Research
  • ASML

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Semiconductor equipment components
  • Vacuum valve manufacturing for…

What could go right

  • Semiconductor capex cycle (leading-edge fabs)
  • Content growth per fab tool

What could go wrong

  • Semiconductor capex cyclicality
  • Customer concentration in top equipment makers

Moat: wide (IP / patents, customer qualification, installed base). Dominant, qualified supplier of ultra-high-vacuum valves deeply embedded in chipmaking tool designs.

Headquarters: Haag, Switzerland · Founded: 1965 · Employees: 3,250

Named competitors

VAT at a glance

Size VAT (VACN.SW) is a Switzerland Industrials company (Industrial Machinery) with a market value of $19.0B, the 28th largest of 158 Switzerland companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CHF 516.60 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 11.2%, against -4.8% for the median peer and +11.6% for the Switzerland market (cap-weighted) — 10th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 2.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.5%); the operating margin is 24.6% (peer median 17.8%).

Valuation It trades at 48.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 22.9× (3rd most expensive of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 26% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is +17 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 14.6 points above its cost of capital (6.4% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 2 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 95VACN.SW 87
Six months, rebased to 100: VAT against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

VAT financials

Reported figures in CHF; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCHF 1.03BCHF 1.07BCHF 942MCHF 885MCHF 1.15B
Revenue growth—+14%+6%-23%—
Gross profitCHF 343MCHF 381MCHF 346MCHF 300MCHF 470M
EBITDACHF 305MCHF 314MCHF 298MCHF 258MCHF 411M
Net incomeCHF 207MCHF 214MCHF 212MCHF 190MCHF 307M
Free cash flowCHF 234MCHF 237MCHF 190MCHF 188MCHF 231M
Capital expenditureCHF 46.6MCHF 68.3MCHF 55.7MCHF 69.2MCHF 66.2M
Total debtn/aCHF 248MCHF 242MCHF 207MCHF 211M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

VAT competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%-20%-10%0%+10%WWDNDSN002050IEX6273SYMXYLALFA7013LECO688082DOVLIFCO-BVLTOG1ALII6954MAIRWTS000651VACN.SW6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. VAT is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%20×40×WWDNDSN002050IEX6273SYMXYLALFA7013LECO688082DOVLIFCO-BG1ALII6954MAIRWTS000651VACN.SWRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. VAT is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%-20%0%20%WWDNDSN002050IEXXYLALFA7013DOVLIFCO-BVLTOG1AMAIR000651VACN.SWGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. VAT is the large dot.

VAT competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (VACN.SW vs MKSI vs ICHR vs 6728.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
VAT VACN.SW$19.0B-11%-2%25%48.2×25.8%
MKS MKSI$13.0B-39%+16%17%11.5×24.0%
Ichor ICHR$1.16B-58%+15%3%9.9×n/a
ULVAC 6728.T$2.01B-34%+7%7%15.5×14.1%

How VAT compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

VAT against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureVACN.SWPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-23.4%-4.0%3rd lowest of 21
6-month return-11.2%-4.8%10th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-29.0%-26.4%11th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-2.2%+7.5%2nd lowest of 21
Operating margin24.6%17.8%2nd highest of 21
Forward P/E48.2×22.9×3rd most expensive of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)25.8%15.0%2nd most demanding of 19
Growth delivered (Del g)+9.2%+8.5%9th highest of 19
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+16.7 pp+4.1 ppmost demanding of 19
ROIC minus cost of capital+14.6 pp+4.3 pp4th highest of 20
EV / EBITDA51.8×16.5×most expensive of 17
Net debt / EBITDA0.9×1.0×9th least indebted of 18

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
VAT VACN.SWSwitzerland$19.0B-11%-2%25%48.2×25.8%+9.2%
Woodward WWDUnited States$18.7B-14%+22%16%31.0×18.9%+7.4%
Nordson NDSNUnited States$17.3B+10%+7%27%24.5×15.4%+5.6%
Zhejiang Sanhua Intelligent Controls 002050.SZChina$21.5B-28%+3%15%33.3×23.8%+20.8%
IDEX IEXUnited States$16.7B+5%+7%21%23.7×14.7%+8.0%
Smc 6273.TJapan$21.9B-27%+16%24%15.9×16.2%+8.8%
SYM SYMUnited States$22.3B-30%+20%1%101.9×n/an/a
Xylem XYLUnited States$22.4B-14%+2%16%17.4×12.1%+13.1%
Alfa Laval ALFA.STSweden$22.5B0%+4%18%24.2×7.9%+10.9%
Ihi 7013.TJapan$15.4B-20%+8%10%12.7×16.7%+8.1%
Lincoln Electric LECOUnited States$14.9B+2%+11%18%22.0×13.3%+9.7%
ACM Research (Shanghai) 688082.SSChina$14.6B+30%+9%15%54.1×n/an/a
Dover DOVUnited States$27.1B-7%+8%18%17.6×12.2%+3.9%
Lifco LIFCO-B.STSweden$13.1B+1%+7%19%29.3×15.2%+15.4%
Veralto VLTOUnited States$28.5B+35%+6%22%24.6×8.3%+4.8%
GEA Group Aktiengesellschaft G1A.DEGermany$12.6B+25%+4%12%21.0×5.8%+3.5%
Lennox International LIIUnited States$11.7B-34%+2%19%15.3×5.0%+7.4%
Fanuc 6954.TJapan$31.2B-23%+13%23%22.0×16.9%+9.2%
Madison Air Solutions MAIRUnited States$11.6B-45%+27%17%20.6×31.9%+27.3%
Watts Water Technologies WTSUnited States$11.6B+17%+17%19%24.6×15.8%+10.1%
Gree Electric Appliances, Inc. of Zhuhai 000651.SZChina$31.2B-3%-11%16%8.6×-16.4%0.0%

Questions

Who are VAT's main competitors?
Named competitors: MKS Instruments (MKSI), Ichor Systems (ICHR), Ulvac (6728.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Woodward (WWD), Nordson (NDSN), Zhejiang Sanhua Intelligent Controls (002050.SZ), IDEX (IEX), Smc (6273.T), SYM (SYM).
Is VAT expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 48.2× against a peer median of 22.9×, 3rd most expensive of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 26% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is +17 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has VAT stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -11.2% against -4.8% for the median peer; over one year +56.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.