Loading…

Parker HannifinPHCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Industrials›Industrial Machinery

Makes motion and control technologies, including hydraulics, pneumatics and filtration systems, for industrial and aerospace customers.

Momentum neutral 43
Mkt cap
$116B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$713M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
24.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+5.5 pp
WACC 10.2%
Hurdle
+11 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BBB+ / A
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
90 days
4 Feb 2027
Close · USD$917.79
1D+2.9%
1W+2.0%
1M-3.1%
3M-13.5%
6M+4.4%
YTD+4.8%
1Y+19.3%
ATR %3.5%
Beta0.77
52w lowhigh16.6% off high

What Parker Hannifin does

Makes motion and control technologies, including hydraulics, pneumatics and filtration systems, for industrial and aerospace customers.

Sells motion-control parts and systems directly to equipment makers and through a large distributor network that serves maintenance and replacement demand. Aerospace is the other main business, supplied under long-term programmes, and the 2022 Meggitt purchase added to it.

Products and services

  • Hydraulics
  • Aerospace systems
  • Filtration
  • Pneumatics

Customers

  • Industrial equipment OEMs
  • Aerospace & defense manufacturers
  • Distributors

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrial machinery
  • Motion & control component…
  • Distribution to industrial/aerospace…

What could go right

  • Aerospace build-rate recovery
  • Industrial automation/capex growth

What could go wrong

  • Industrial capex cyclicality
  • Aerospace supply-chain disruption

Moat: narrow (scale, distribution, installed base). Broad distribution network and engineering breadth across motion-control niches versus smaller specialists.

Headquarters: Cleveland, Ohio, US · Founded: 1917 · Employees: 59,850

Named competitors

Parker Hannifin at a glance

Size Parker Hannifin (PH) is a United States Industrials company (Industrial Machinery) with a market value of $116B, the 112th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $917.79 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 4.4%, against -2.8% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 4th highest of 17 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 8.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +10.3%); the operating margin is 21.9% (peer median 15.9%).

Valuation It trades at 24.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 22.6× (6th most expensive of 17).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 19% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is +11 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 5.5 points above its cost of capital (10.2% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $13.7B at 30 Sep 2026, up 21% on a year earlier — 0.6 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Credit Parker Hannifin has 17 bonds outstanding ($12.1B), rated BBB+ by the agencies and trading like A at a weighted spread of 71 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 1.2% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 4 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10011012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026PH 105Peer median 96
Six months, rebased to 100: Parker Hannifin against the median of its 17 peers (local-currency closes).

Parker Hannifin financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2026-06-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023
Revenue$21.5B$21.5B$19.9B$19.9B$19.1B
Revenue growth—+8%0%+5%—
Gross profit$8.14B$8.14B$7.35B$7.16B$6.46B
EBITDA$5.66B$5.64B$5.04B$4.83B$4.04B
Net income$3.65B$3.65B$3.53B$2.84B$2.08B
Free cash flow$3.90B$3.90B$3.34B$2.98B$2.60B
Capital expenditure$459M$459M$435M$400M$381M
Total debt$8.73B$8.73B$9.49B$10.8B$12.8B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Parker Hannifin competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-50%-25%0%6501TTATCO-AJCIHON002371SIECARRSCHN688012300502ASMIR6954PH6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Parker Hannifin is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%20×40×60×6501TTATCO-AJCIHON002371CARRSCHN688012300502ASM000651PHRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Parker Hannifin is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%0%25%50%6501TTJCIHON0023716367SCHN688012300502ASM000651PHGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Parker Hannifin is the large dot.

Parker Hannifin competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (PH vs ETN vs DHR vs IR)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Parker Hannifin PH$116B+4%+8%22%24.4×19.0%
Eaton ETN$133B-15%+20%19%21.4×19.1%
Danaher DHR$162B+35%+6%21%25.3×20.5%
Ingersoll Rand IR$31.9B+10%+8%19%21.8×17.3%

How Parker Hannifin compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Parker Hannifin against its 17 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasurePHPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-3.1%-6.7%8th highest of 18
6-month return+4.4%-2.8%4th highest of 17
Distance from 52-week high-16.6%-20.6%7th highest of 18
Revenue growth (TTM)+8.3%+10.3%8th lowest of 18
Operating margin21.9%15.9%4th highest of 18
Forward P/E24.4×22.6×6th most expensive of 17
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)19.0%17.5%5th most demanding of 17
Growth delivered (Del g)+8.4%+10.1%8th lowest of 17
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+10.6 pp+4.5 pp6th most demanding of 17
ROIC minus cost of capital+5.5 pp+5.1 pp9th highest of 18
EV / EBITDA21.9×17.5×most expensive of 13
Net debt / EBITDA1.5×0.4×6th most indebted of 14
Bond spread71 bp67 bp4th widest of 8

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Parker Hannifin PHUnited States$116B+4%+8%22%24.4×19.0%+8.4%
Hitachi 6501.TJapan$130B-7%+14%12%20.9×9.5%+3.9%
Trane Technologies TTUnited States$87.9B-14%+10%18%23.4×14.7%+11.4%
Atlas Copco ATCO-A.STSweden$87.5B+4%+3%20%29.7×17.7%+11.0%
Johnson Controls JCIUnited States$81.8B-3%+9%16%21.3×17.8%+1.6%
Honeywell Technologies HONUnited States$69.8B-1%-17%18%23.2×4.1%+2.8%
NAURA Technology 002371.SZChina$60.6B+4%+18%11%56.5×33.4%+45.5%
Siemens SIE.DEGermany$225B-4%+4%13%23.4×18.3%+7.4%
Carrier Global CARRUnited States$42.9B-22%+3%9%17.2×19.0%+4.5%
Daikin Industries 6367.TJapan$40.4B-1%+11%8%21.8×7.4%+15.0%
Yushu Technology 688836.SSChina$39.8Bn/a+333%19%n/an/an/a
Schindler SCHN.SWSwitzerland$39.4B+17%-3%13%28.2×2.3%+0.6%
Advanced Micro-Fabrication Equipment Inc. China 688012.SSChina$36.5B+1%+26%12%51.5×51.7%+40.3%
Eoptolink Technology 300502.SZChina$36.0B-54%+101%44%12.3×21.7%+65.5%
ASM International ASM.ASNetherlands$35.5B-28%+13%31%27.0×30.0%+19.0%
Ingersoll Rand IRUnited States$31.9B+10%+8%19%21.8×17.3%+14.0%
Gree Electric Appliances, Inc. of Zhuhai 000651.SZChina$31.2B-3%-11%16%8.6×-16.4%0.0%
Fanuc 6954.TJapan$31.2B-23%+13%23%22.0×16.9%+9.2%

Parker Hannifin bonds and credit

Parker Hannifin has 17 bonds outstanding with $12.1B face value. The agencies rate it BBB+; its bonds trade like A. Weighted yield 4.97%, a spread of 71 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Parker Hannifin backlog

Parker Hannifin reported $13.7B of remaining performance obligations at 30 Sep 2026, up 21% from a year earlier and up 7% from the previous quarter. That is 0.6 years of trailing revenue already under contract. Book-to-bill last quarter: 1.15.

Questions

Who are Parker Hannifin's main competitors?
Named competitors: Eaton Corporation (ETN), Danaher (DHR), Ingersoll Rand (IR). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Hitachi (6501.T), Trane Technologies (TT), Atlas Copco (ATCO-A.ST), Johnson Controls (JCI), Honeywell Technologies (HON), NAURA Technology (002371.SZ).
Is Parker Hannifin expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 24.4× against a peer median of 22.6×, 6th most expensive of 17 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 19% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is +11 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Parker Hannifin stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +4.4% against -2.8% for the median peer; over one year +19.3%.
What is Parker Hannifin's backlog?
Parker Hannifin's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $13.7B at 30 Sep 2026, +21% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.