Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 6425.T Universal Entertainment CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

Universal Entertainment Corporation6425.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Industrials›Industrial Conglomerates
Momentum neutral 46
Mkt cap
$324M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
25%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$822,681
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
9.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-3.6 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
+9 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
7 days
13 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥660
1D-4.9%
1W+1.5%
1M+0.3%
3M-1.6%
6M-9.8%
YTD-17.1%
1Y-29.8%
ATR %3.7%
52w lowhigh29.7% off high

What Universal Entertainment does

Employees: 7,004

Universal Entertainment at a glance

Size Universal Entertainment (6425.T) is a Japan Industrials company (Industrial Conglomerates) with a market value of $324M, the 1317th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥660 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 9.8%, against -15.1% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 3rd highest of 8 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 9.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +10.8%); the operating margin is 4.2% (peer median 3.8%).

Valuation It trades at 9.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 12.3× (cheapest of 6).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 15% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is +9 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.6 points below its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 13 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20266425.T 90Peer median 85
Six months, rebased to 100: Universal Entertainment against the median of its 7 peers (local-currency closes).

Universal Entertainment financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥137B¥123B¥126B¥179B¥141B
Revenue growth—-3%-29%+27%—
Gross profit¥77.9B¥52.8B¥57.6B¥82.6B¥60.9B
EBITDA¥20.8B¥14.6B¥21.0B¥47.7B¥30.3B
Net income-¥221B-¥231B-¥15.6B¥28.4B¥11.5B
Free cash flown/a¥2.49B-¥7.04B¥17.0B¥16.9B
Capital expendituren/a¥9.26B¥9.03B¥11.7B¥8.03B
Total debt¥197B¥195B¥188B¥175B¥174B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Universal Entertainment competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%+150%-60%-40%-20%0%30101132726030133533184369GSJ27676425.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Universal Entertainment is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%+60%25×50×75×3272603013354369GSJ27676425.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Universal Entertainment is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%0%20%327260301335436927676425.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Universal Entertainment is the large dot.

Universal Entertainment competitors and peer comparison

How Universal Entertainment compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Universal Entertainment against its 7 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure6425.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+0.3%-7.8%3rd highest of 8
6-month return-9.8%-15.1%3rd highest of 8
Distance from 52-week high-29.7%-31.5%4th highest of 8
Revenue growth (TTM)+9.2%+10.8%4th lowest of 8
Operating margin4.2%3.8%4th highest of 8
Forward P/E9.4×12.3×cheapest of 6
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)15.1%14.8%3rd least demanding of 5
Growth delivered (Del g)+6.2%+24.1%lowest of 5
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+8.9 pp-7.3 ppmost demanding of 5
ROIC minus cost of capital-3.6 pp-1.7 pp3rd lowest of 7
EV / EBITDA9.7×8.7×2nd most expensive of 4
Net debt / EBITDA7.3×-0.9×most indebted of 6

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Universal Entertainment 6425.TJapan$324M-10%+9%4%9.4×15.1%+6.2%
Guangzhou Wahlap Technology 301011.SZChina$325M-30%-18%-8%n/an/an/a
RF Materials 327260.KSSouth Korea$292M-51%+57%18%29.5×16.7%+28.6%
Hangzhou Tianyuan Pet Products 301335.SZChina$415M-15%+4%2%88.6×13.0%+15.7%
China Boton 3318.HKHong Kong$435M+163%+11%-5%n/an/an/a
Tri Chemical Laboratories 4369.TJapan$511M-22%+12%25%12.3×19.4%+19.5%
Grupo Empresarial San Jose GSJ.MCSpain$517M-14%+11%4%10.6×n/an/a
Tsuburaya Fields 2767.TJapan$963M+72%-5%10%10.1×-10.3%+35.0%

Questions

Which companies are Universal Entertainment's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Guangzhou Wahlap Technology (301011.SZ), RF Materials (327260.KS), Hangzhou Tianyuan Pet Products (301335.SZ), China Boton (3318.HK), Tri Chemical Laboratories (4369.T), Grupo Empresarial San Jose (GSJ.MC), Tsuburaya Fields (2767.T).
Is Universal Entertainment expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 9.4× against a peer median of 12.3×, cheapest of 6 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 15% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is +9 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Universal Entertainment stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -9.8% against -15.1% for the median peer; over one year -29.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.