Loading…

CEATCEATLTD.NSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

India · INR·Auto & Ancillaries›Automotive Aftermarket

Indian tire manufacturer (RPG Group) making tires for two-wheelers, cars, trucks and farm equipment.

Momentum strong 64
Mkt cap
$1.52B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
51%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$3.61M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
31.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-6.6 pp
WACC 16.8%
Hurdle
+9 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
75 days
20 Jan 2027
Close · INR₹3,546
1D+2.1%
1W+14.8%
1M+7.4%
3M-5.6%
6M+5.6%
YTD-7.0%
1Y-13.6%
ATR %2.9%
Beta1.29
52w lowhigh15.6% off high

What CEAT does

Indian tire manufacturer (RPG Group) making tires for two-wheelers, cars, trucks and farm equipment.

Sells tyres to vehicle makers for new vehicles and, through dealers, as replacements, where most tyre volume sits. Natural rubber, synthetic rubber and carbon black are its main inputs, so their prices swing profit. The RPG Group, controlled by the Goenka family, owns CEAT.

Products and services

  • Two-wheeler tires
  • Passenger car tires
  • Commercial vehicle tires
  • Farm/off-road tires

Customers

  • Two-wheeler and auto OEMs
  • Aftermarket dealers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Tires/rubber products
  • Tire manufacturing (2W, PV, CV, farm)
  • Domestic and export distribution

What could go right

  • Two-wheeler/replacement tire demand
  • Export market growth

What could go wrong

  • Natural rubber/crude-derivative price volatility
  • Competitive domestic pricing pressure

Moat: narrow (brand, distribution). Established Indian tire brand and dealer network, but MRF and Apollo have larger scale.

Headquarters: Mumbai, India · Founded: 1958 · Employees: 16,766

Named competitors

CEAT at a glance

Size CEAT (CEATLTD.NS) is an India Consumer Discretionary company (Automotive Aftermarket) with a market value of $1.52B, the 465th largest of 1,058 India companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₹3,546 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 5.6%, against -12.1% for the median peer and 0.0% for the India market (cap-weighted) — 5th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 24.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.2%); the operating margin is 7.0% (peer median 8.1%).

Valuation It trades at 31.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.6× (2nd most expensive of 18).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 25% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +15%, so the hurdle is +9 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 6.6 points below its cost of capital (16.8% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 20 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026CEATLTD.NS 107Peer median 90
Six months, rebased to 100: CEAT against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

CEAT financials

Reported figures in INR; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₹175B₹155B₹131B₹118B₹112B
Revenue growth—+19%+11%+6%—
Gross profit₹44.9B₹36.6B₹29.2B₹30.9B₹21.5B
EBITDA₹19.8B₹19.9B₹13.8B₹16.3B₹8.61B
Net income₹5.16B₹6.98B₹4.73B₹6.43B₹1.86B
Free cash flown/a₹3.54B-₹758M₹6.03B₹1.47B
Capital expendituren/a₹11.5B₹9.43B₹8.67B₹8.79B
Total debt₹40.6B₹32.7B₹21.4B₹17.9B₹23.0B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

CEAT competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-30%-20%-10%0%+10%-10%0%+10%+20%000599601163001233GT7313073240JKTYREXPELTYRESSMP601966000589002984603049601500APOLLOTYRE21055105BENGALASMCEATLTD.NS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. CEAT is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%20×40×6011630012337313073240JKTYREXPELTYRESSMP601966000589002984603049601500APOLLOTYRE2105CEATLTD.NSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. CEAT is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%-20%0%20%000599601163001233GTTYRESSMP601966002984601500APOLLOTYRE21055105BENGALASM5110CEATLTD.NSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. CEAT is the large dot.

CEAT competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (CEATLTD.NS vs MRF.NS vs APOLLOTYRE.NS vs JKTYRE.NS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
CEAT CEATLTD.NS$1.52B+6%+24%7%31.0×24.9%
MRF MRF.NS$5.62B-4%+11%10%25.7×20.7%
Apollo Tyres APOLLOTYRE.NS$2.80B+1%+14%8%16.6×15.6%
JK Tyre & Industries JKTYRE.NS$1.10B-12%+13%7%20.6×n/a

How CEAT compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

CEAT against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureCEATLTD.NSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+7.4%-1.0%4th highest of 21
6-month return+5.6%-12.1%5th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-15.6%-31.9%4th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+24.5%+5.2%2nd highest of 21
Operating margin7.0%8.1%8th lowest of 21
Forward P/E31.0×16.6×2nd most expensive of 18
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)24.9%-1.6%most demanding of 15
Growth delivered (Del g)+15.5%+8.5%2nd highest of 15
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+9.4 pp-8.8 pp3rd most demanding of 15
ROIC minus cost of capital-6.6 pp+0.7 pp3rd lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA9.3×6.1×5th most expensive of 12
Net debt / EBITDA2.0×1.3×4th most indebted of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
CEAT CEATLTD.NSIndia$1.52B+6%+24%7%31.0×24.9%+15.5%
Qingdao Doublestar 000599.SZChina$1.45B-34%+390%8%n/a-2.9%+1.0%
Triangle Tyre 601163.SSChina$1.38B-21%+2%5%18.2×-7.2%+2.9%
Haian Rubber 001233.SZChina$1.82B+9%-4%23%25.6×1.8%+13.7%
Goodyear Tire & Rubber GTUnited States$1.26B-33%-4%3%n/a5.9%+8.2%
TS Tech 7313.TJapan$1.25B-3%0%2%23.3×n/an/a
Kumhotire 073240.KSSouth Korea$1.12B-9%+2%12%4.2×n/an/a
JK Tyre & Industries JKTYRE.NSIndia$1.10B-12%+13%7%20.6×n/an/a
XPEL XPELUnited States$1.06B-12%+13%14%16.5×n/an/a
Nokian Renkaat TYRES.HEFinland$2.21B+37%+5%6%27.4×19.4%+0.9%
Standard Motor Products SMPUnited States$993M+10%+6%11%9.3×-8.5%+9.7%
Shandong Linglong Tyre 601966.SSChina$2.32B-19%+8%3%50.3×-0.4%+6.0%
Guizhou Tyre 000589.SZChina$974M-18%+8%8%8.7×n/an/a
Qingdao Sentury Tire 002984.SZChina$2.62B-25%+2%8%16.7×3.4%+12.8%
Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd. A 603049.SSChina$2.70B-19%+14%8%9.7×n/an/a
Jiangsu General Science Technology 601500.SSChina$831M-25%+11%5%14.6×-3.5%+19.8%
Apollo Tyres APOLLOTYRE.NSIndia$2.80B+1%+14%8%16.6×15.6%+10.7%
Cheng Shin Rubber Ind 2105.TWTaiwan$2.95B-3%-1%9%20.3×-9.3%-1.2%
Toyo Tire 5105.TJapan$3.17B+6%+4%15%8.2×-7.3%+11.6%
Bengal & Assam BENGALASM.NSIndia$688M-13%+12%13%n/a19.9%-25.6%
Sumitomo Rubber Industries 5110.TJapan$3.40B+1%+5%8%9.8×-3.3%+8.8%

Questions

Who are CEAT's main competitors?
Named competitors: MRF (MRF.NS), Apollo Tyres (APOLLOTYRE.NS), JK Tyre & Industries (JKTYRE.NS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Qingdao Doublestar (000599.SZ), Triangle Tyre (601163.SS), Haian Rubber (001233.SZ), Goodyear Tire & Rubber (GT), TS Tech (7313.T), Kumhotire (073240.KS).
Is CEAT expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 31.0× against a peer median of 16.6×, 2nd most expensive of 18 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 25% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +15%, so the hurdle is +9 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has CEAT stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +5.6% against -12.1% for the median peer; over one year -13.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.