Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 000599.SZ Qingdao Doublestar Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Qingdao Doublestar Co., Ltd. Class A000599.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Consumer Discretionary›Automotive Aftermarket

Chinese industrial group focused on tires and tire-retreading/recycling machinery, historically known for rubber shoes.

Momentum laggard 15
Mkt cap
$1.45B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
90%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$13.0M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
+1.0 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-4 pp
Req g minus delivered
Close · CNYCN¥3.96
1D-3.9%
1W+6.5%
1M-10.4%
3M-19.7%
6M-33.6%
YTD-40.2%
1Y-31.1%
ATR %5.8%
52w lowhigh53.0% off high

What Qingdao Doublestar does

Chinese industrial group focused on tires and tire-retreading/recycling machinery, historically known for rubber shoes.

Products and services

  • Passenger/truck tires
  • Tire retreading & recycling equipment
  • Rubber footwear (legacy)

Customers

  • Aftermarket tire distributors
  • Tire retreaders

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials/consumer discretionary
  • Tires & rubber machinery
  • Tire manufacturing & retreading…

What could go right

  • Tire recycling/circular-economy demand

What could go wrong

  • Rubber price cycles
  • Tire market competition

Moat: none. Diversified rubber-industrial conglomerate without a clear structural advantage in a competitive tire market.

Headquarters: Qingdao, Shandong, China · Founded: 1921 · Employees: 5,909

Named competitors

Qingdao Doublestar at a glance

Size Qingdao Doublestar (000599.SZ) is a China Consumer Discretionary company (Automotive Aftermarket) with a market value of $1.45B, the 1676th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥3.96 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 33.6%, against -10.5% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 389.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.2%); the operating margin is 7.7% (peer median 8.1%).

Valuation It trades at 1.3× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 0.9× (6th most expensive of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -3% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +1%, so the hurdle is -4 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.0 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 93000599.SZ 66
Six months, rebased to 100: Qingdao Doublestar against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Qingdao Doublestar financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥22.0BCN¥4.62BCN¥4.29BCN¥4.62BCN¥3.91B
Revenue growth—+8%-7%+18%—
Gross profitCN¥5.35BCN¥222MCN¥309MCN¥317MCN¥18.4M
EBITDAn/a-CN¥54.3M-CN¥15.5MCN¥72.6M-CN¥164M
Net income-CN¥93.7M-CN¥360M-CN¥356M-CN¥176M-CN¥602M
Free cash flowCN¥1.05B-CN¥289M-CN¥442MCN¥38.0MCN¥175M
Capital expenditureCN¥1.21BCN¥148MCN¥458MCN¥243MCN¥162M
Total debtCN¥16.4BCN¥5.83BCN¥5.56BCN¥5.95BCN¥5.64B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Qingdao Doublestar competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-30%-20%-10%0%+10%-10%0%+10%+20%CEATLTD601163GT7313001233073240JKTYREXPELSMP000589TYRES601966601500002984603049APOLLOTYRE2105BENGALASM5105000599.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Qingdao Doublestar is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+100%+200%+300%1×2×CEATLTD601163GT7313001233073240JKTYREXPELSMPTYRES601500002984BENGALASM000599.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Qingdao Doublestar is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%-20%0%20%CEATLTD601163GT001233SMPTYRES601966601500002984APOLLOTYRE2105BENGALASM51055110000599.SZGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Qingdao Doublestar is the large dot.

Qingdao Doublestar competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (000599.SZ vs 603049.SS vs 601058.SS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq g
Qingdao Doublestar 000599.SZ$1.45B-34%+390%8%1.3×-2.9%
Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd. A 603049.SS$2.70B-19%+14%8%0.7×n/a
Sailun 601058.SS$5.92B-10%+12%12%1.4×n/a

How Qingdao Doublestar compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Qingdao Doublestar against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure000599.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-10.4%-0.3%3rd lowest of 21
6-month return-33.6%-10.5%lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-53.0%-29.2%2nd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+389.6%+5.2%highest of 21
Operating margin7.7%8.1%9th lowest of 21
EV / Sales1.3×0.9×6th most expensive of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-2.9%0.7%7th least demanding of 15
Growth delivered (Del g)+1.0%+9.3%4th lowest of 15
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-3.8 pp-8.8 pp6th most demanding of 15
ROIC minus cost of capital+1.0 pp+0.2 pp10th highest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Qingdao Doublestar 000599.SZChina$1.45B-34%+390%8%1.3×-2.9%+1.0%
CEAT CEATLTD.NSIndia$1.52B+6%+24%7%1.1×24.9%+15.5%
Triangle Tyre 601163.SSChina$1.38B-21%+2%5%0.8×-7.2%+2.9%
Goodyear Tire & Rubber GTUnited States$1.26B-33%-4%3%0.5×5.9%+8.2%
TS Tech 7313.TJapan$1.25B-3%0%2%0.3×n/an/a
Haian Rubber 001233.SZChina$1.82B+9%-4%23%4.1×1.8%+13.7%
Kumhotire 073240.KSSouth Korea$1.12B-9%+2%12%0.3×n/an/a
JK Tyre & Industries JKTYRE.NSIndia$1.10B-12%+13%7%0.9×n/an/a
XPEL XPELUnited States$1.06B-12%+13%14%2.1×n/an/a
Standard Motor Products SMPUnited States$993M+10%+6%11%0.8×-8.5%+9.7%
Guizhou Tyre 000589.SZChina$974M-18%+8%8%0.9×n/an/a
Nokian Renkaat TYRES.HEFinland$2.21B+37%+5%6%2.0×19.4%+0.9%
Shandong Linglong Tyre 601966.SSChina$2.32B-19%+8%3%1.1×-0.4%+6.0%
Jiangsu General Science Technology 601500.SSChina$831M-25%+11%5%1.2×-3.5%+19.8%
Qingdao Sentury Tire 002984.SZChina$2.62B-25%+2%8%1.9×3.4%+12.8%
Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd. A 603049.SSChina$2.70B-19%+14%8%0.7×n/an/a
Apollo Tyres APOLLOTYRE.NSIndia$2.80B+1%+14%8%1.0×15.6%+10.7%
Cheng Shin Rubber Ind 2105.TWTaiwan$2.95B-3%-1%9%0.9×-9.3%-1.2%
Bengal & Assam BENGALASM.NSIndia$688M-13%+12%13%2.7×19.9%-25.6%
Toyo Tire 5105.TJapan$3.17B+6%+4%15%0.8×-7.3%+11.6%
Sumitomo Rubber Industries 5110.TJapan$3.40B+1%+5%8%0.6×-3.3%+8.8%

Questions

Who are Qingdao Doublestar's main competitors?
Named competitors: Zhongce Rubber Group (603049.SS), Sailun Group (601058.SS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes CEAT (CEATLTD.NS), Triangle Tyre (601163.SS), Goodyear Tire & Rubber (GT), TS Tech (7313.T), Haian Rubber (001233.SZ), Kumhotire (073240.KS).
Is Qingdao Doublestar expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 1.3× against a peer median of 0.9×, 6th most expensive of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -3% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +1%, so the hurdle is -4 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Qingdao Doublestar stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -33.6% against -10.5% for the median peer; over one year -31.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.