Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › APOLLOTYRE.NS Apollo Tyres Limited.Open in the cockpit ↗

Apollo Tyres Limited.APOLLOTYRE.NSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

India · INR·Auto & Ancillaries›Automotive Aftermarket

Indian tire maker for cars, trucks and two-wheelers, also owning the European Vredestein premium tire brand.

Momentum neutral 55
Mkt cap
$2.80B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
52%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$3.34M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
16.6×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-6.4 pp
WACC 14.7%
Hurdle
+5 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
89 days
3 Feb 2027
Close · INR₹415.95
1D-0.7%
1W+9.6%
1M+2.0%
3M-7.5%
6M+1.4%
YTD-16.8%
1Y-17.3%
ATR %3.1%
Beta1.03
52w lowhigh23.0% off high

What Apollo Tyres does

Indian tire maker for cars, trucks and two-wheelers, also owning the European Vredestein premium tire brand.

Sells most of its tires through the replacement market, meaning dealer purchases when tires wear out, with fewer sales to new-vehicle makers; natural rubber and oil-derived inputs are a big cost. The Kanwar family controls the company. It bought Vredestein in 2009 to enter Europe.

Products and services

  • Passenger car tires
  • Commercial vehicle tires
  • Vredestein (Europe) tires
  • Two-wheeler/farm tires

Customers

  • Auto OEMs
  • Aftermarket/dealer network (India, Europe)

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Tires/rubber products
  • Passenger, commercial & two-wheeler…
  • Premium European brand (Vredestein)

What could go right

  • Indian auto/replacement tire demand growth
  • European Vredestein premiumization

What could go wrong

  • Natural rubber price volatility
  • European market cyclicality

Moat: narrow (brand, distribution, scale). Strong domestic brand and OEM relationships, plus a premium European brand, but MRF and global majors compete hard.

Headquarters: Gurugram, India · Founded: 1972 · Employees: 15,027

Named competitors

Apollo Tyres at a glance

Size Apollo Tyres (APOLLOTYRE.NS) is an India Consumer Discretionary company (Automotive Aftermarket) with a market value of $2.80B, the 303rd largest of 1,058 India companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₹415.95 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 1.4%, against -3.1% for the median peer and 0.0% for the India market (cap-weighted) — 9th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 13.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.7%); the operating margin is 8.0% (peer median 8.4%).

Valuation It trades at 16.6× forward earnings against a peer median of 17.4× (9th cheapest of 19).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 16% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +11%, so the hurdle is +5 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 6.4 points below its cost of capital (14.7% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 3 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026APOLLOTYRE.NS 102Peer median 97
Six months, rebased to 100: Apollo Tyres against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Apollo Tyres financials

Reported figures in INR; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₹304B₹283B₹259B₹251B₹242B
Revenue growth—+9%+3%+4%—
Gross profit₹80.3B₹68.7B₹54.5B₹59.2B₹43.7B
EBITDA₹39.8B₹43.9B₹35.5B₹43.8B₹29.7B
Net income₹17.4B₹13.7B₹11.2B₹17.2B₹10.5B
Free cash flown/a₹19.2B₹6.68B₹22.7B₹9.14B
Capital expendituren/a₹14.0B₹7.69B₹7.30B₹7.77B
Total debt₹55.1B₹36.8B₹44.1B₹49.1B₹64.2B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Apollo Tyres competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-30%-20%-10%0%+10%-10%0%+10%+20%603049210500298451056019665110TYRESDORM001233BALKRISINDLKQCEATLTD000599161390MRF60116360105873135101APOLLOTYRE.NS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Apollo Tyres is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%20×40×603049210500298451056019665110TYRESDORM001233BALKRISINDLKQCEATLTD161390MRF60116360105873135101APOLLOTYRE.NSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Apollo Tyres is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%0%20%210500298451056019665110TYRESDORM001233LKQCEATLTD000599161390MRFGTAPOLLOTYRE.NSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Apollo Tyres is the large dot.

Apollo Tyres competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (APOLLOTYRE.NS vs MRF.NS vs CEATLTD.NS vs JKTYRE.NS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Apollo Tyres APOLLOTYRE.NS$2.80B+1%+14%8%16.6×15.6%
MRF MRF.NS$5.62B-4%+11%10%25.7×20.7%
CEAT CEATLTD.NS$1.52B+6%+24%7%31.0×24.9%
JK Tyre & Industries JKTYRE.NS$1.10B-12%+13%7%20.6×n/a

How Apollo Tyres compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Apollo Tyres against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureAPOLLOTYRE.NSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+2.0%-0.1%7th highest of 21
6-month return+1.4%-3.1%9th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-23.0%-24.3%11th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+13.8%+4.7%6th highest of 21
Operating margin8.0%8.4%9th lowest of 21
Forward P/E16.6×17.4×9th cheapest of 19
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)15.6%0.0%4th most demanding of 16
Growth delivered (Del g)+10.7%+8.8%8th highest of 16
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+4.8 pp-8.1 pp4th most demanding of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital-6.4 pp-0.4 pp2nd lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA7.8×6.1×6th most expensive of 14
Net debt / EBITDA1.1×1.3×7th least indebted of 14

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Apollo Tyres APOLLOTYRE.NSIndia$2.80B+1%+14%8%16.6×15.6%+10.7%
Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd. A 603049.SSChina$2.70B-19%+14%8%9.7×n/an/a
Cheng Shin Rubber Ind 2105.TWTaiwan$2.95B-3%-1%9%20.3×-9.3%-1.2%
Qingdao Sentury Tire 002984.SZChina$2.62B-25%+2%8%16.7×3.4%+12.8%
Toyo Tire 5105.TJapan$3.17B+6%+4%15%8.2×-7.3%+11.6%
Shandong Linglong Tyre 601966.SSChina$2.32B-19%+8%3%50.3×-0.4%+6.0%
Sumitomo Rubber Industries 5110.TJapan$3.40B+1%+5%8%9.8×-3.3%+8.8%
Nokian Renkaat TYRES.HEFinland$2.21B+37%+5%6%27.4×19.4%+0.9%
Dorman Products DORMUnited States$4.03B+10%+2%16%15.8×4.3%+14.3%
Haian Rubber 001233.SZChina$1.82B+9%-4%23%25.6×1.8%+13.7%
Balkrishna Industries BALKRISIND.NSIndia$4.93B+7%+20%15%30.5×n/an/a
LKQ LKQUnited States$5.06B-31%-3%7%9.3×0.0%+3.3%
CEAT CEATLTD.NSIndia$1.52B+6%+24%7%31.0×24.9%+15.5%
Qingdao Doublestar 000599.SZChina$1.45B-34%+390%8%n/a-2.9%+1.0%
Hankook Tire & Technology 161390.KSSouth Korea$5.56B+5%+43%10%6.1×-13.2%+26.9%
MRF MRF.NSIndia$5.62B-4%+11%10%25.7×20.7%+14.0%
Triangle Tyre 601163.SSChina$1.38B-21%+2%5%18.2×-7.2%+2.9%
Sailun 601058.SSChina$5.92B-10%+12%12%10.4×n/an/a
Goodyear Tire & Rubber GTUnited States$1.26B-33%-4%3%n/a5.9%+8.2%
TS Tech 7313.TJapan$1.25B-3%0%2%23.3×n/an/a
Yokohama Rubber 5101.TJapan$6.78B+8%+13%15%8.1×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Apollo Tyres's main competitors?
Named competitors: MRF (MRF.NS), CEAT (CEATLTD.NS), JK Tyre & Industries (JKTYRE.NS), Bridgestone/Michelin (India) (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd. A (603049.SS), Cheng Shin Rubber Ind (2105.TW), Qingdao Sentury Tire (002984.SZ), Toyo Tire (5105.T), Shandong Linglong Tyre (601966.SS), Sumitomo Rubber Industries (5110.T).
Is Apollo Tyres expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 16.6× against a peer median of 17.4×, 9th cheapest of 19 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 16% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +11%, so the hurdle is +5 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Apollo Tyres stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +1.4% against -3.1% for the median peer; over one year -17.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.