Loading…

MRFMRF.NSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

India · INR·Auto & Ancillaries›Automotive Aftermarket

India's largest tyre manufacturer, making tyres for two-wheelers, passenger cars, trucks and motorsport.

≈ India's GoodyearMomentum neutral 52
Mkt cap
$5.62B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
53%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$4.12M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
25.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-3.8 pp
WACC 14.7%
Hurdle
+7 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
4 days
10 Nov 2026
Close · INR₹125,295
1D-0.5%
1W+7.3%
1M+1.8%
3M-6.5%
6M-3.6%
YTD-18.0%
1Y-20.8%
ATR %1.8%
Beta0.78
52w lowhigh21.5% off high

What MRF does

India's largest tyre manufacturer, making tyres for two-wheelers, passenger cars, trucks and motorsport.

Sells most tyres through its dealer network to owners replacing worn ones, with a smaller share supplied to carmakers and two-wheeler makers for new vehicles; replacement demand is steadier. Its raw materials, natural and synthetic rubber, carbon black and nylon, are tied to oil and farm prices, so margins swing with them. The Mammen Mappillai family founded and controls it.

In one line: India's Goodyear.

Products and services

  • Passenger vehicle tyres
  • Two-wheeler tyres
  • Truck/bus tyres
  • Motorsport tyres

Customers

  • Automotive OEMs
  • Replacement/aftermarket tyre buyers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer discretionary
  • Auto parts
  • Tyres - India

What could go right

  • Replacement tyre demand growth
  • Two-wheeler/PV production growth in India

What could go wrong

  • Rubber/crude-derivative raw material cost swings
  • Auto production cyclicality

Moat: narrow (brand, distribution, scale). Longstanding brand trust and a wide dealer network make MRF the aftermarket leader in India.

Headquarters: Chennai, India · Founded: 1946 · Employees: 16,283

Named competitors

MRF at a glance

Size MRF (MRF.NS) is an India Consumer Discretionary company (Automotive Aftermarket) with a market value of $5.62B, the 197th largest of 1,058 India companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₹125,295 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 3.6%, against +1.6% for the median peer and 0.0% for the India market (cap-weighted) — 7th lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 11.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.8%); the operating margin is 9.6% (peer median 8.4%).

Valuation It trades at 25.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.6× (5th most expensive of 19).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 21% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +14%, so the hurdle is +7 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.8 points below its cost of capital (14.7% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 10 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 102MRF.NS 96
Six months, rebased to 100: MRF against the median of its 19 peers (local-currency closes).

MRF financials

Reported figures in INR; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₹319B₹311B₹281B₹252B₹230B
Revenue growth—+11%+12%+9%—
Gross profit₹79.1B₹52.6B₹43.6B₹47.5B₹27.0B
EBITDA₹48.2B₹49.6B₹41.4B₹43.2B₹24.4B
Net income₹24.2B₹24.3B₹18.7B₹20.8B₹7.69B
Free cash flown/a₹29.9B₹3.98B₹9.48B-₹6.89B
Capital expendituren/a₹14.3B₹13.1B₹21.6B₹32.9B
Total debtn/a₹31.9B₹37.5B₹28.1B₹30.0B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

MRF competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%0%+20%+40%161390601058LKQBALKRISIND5101DORMPIRC51102105603049002984601966TYRES001233CEATLTD000599MRF.NS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. MRF is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%20×40×161390601058LKQBALKRISIND5101DORMPIRC51102105APOLLOTYRE603049601966TYRESCON001233CEATLTDMRF.NSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. MRF is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%0%20%161390LKQDORMPIRC511051052105APOLLOTYRE002984TYRESCON001233CEATLTD000599MRF.NSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. MRF is the large dot.

MRF competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (MRF.NS vs APOLLOTYRE.NS vs CEATLTD.NS vs JKTYRE.NS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
MRF MRF.NS$5.62B-4%+11%10%25.7×20.7%
Apollo Tyres APOLLOTYRE.NS$2.80B+1%+14%8%16.6×15.6%
CEAT CEATLTD.NS$1.52B+6%+24%7%31.0×24.9%
JK Tyre & Industries JKTYRE.NS$1.10B-12%+13%7%20.6×n/a

How MRF compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

MRF against its 19 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureMRF.NSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+1.8%+2.0%10th lowest of 20
6-month return-3.6%+1.6%7th lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-21.5%-20.2%10th lowest of 20
Revenue growth (TTM)+11.4%+4.8%9th highest of 20
Operating margin9.6%8.4%8th highest of 19
Forward P/E25.7×14.6×5th most expensive of 19
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)20.7%-0.2%2nd most demanding of 16
Growth delivered (Del g)+14.0%+9.5%4th highest of 16
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+6.6 pp-8.1 pp4th most demanding of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital-3.8 pp+0.2 pp6th lowest of 19
EV / EBITDA11.0×7.6×3rd most expensive of 12
Net debt / EBITDA-0.4×1.3×2nd least indebted of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
MRF MRF.NSIndia$5.62B-4%+11%10%25.7×20.7%+14.0%
Hankook Tire & Technology 161390.KSSouth Korea$5.56B+5%+43%10%6.1×-13.2%+26.9%
Sailun 601058.SSChina$5.92B-10%+12%12%10.4×n/an/a
LKQ LKQUnited States$5.06B-31%-3%7%9.3×0.0%+3.3%
Balkrishna Industries BALKRISIND.NSIndia$4.93B+7%+20%15%30.5×n/an/a
Yokohama Rubber 5101.TJapan$6.78B+8%+13%15%8.1×n/an/a
Dorman Products DORMUnited States$4.03B+10%+2%16%15.8×4.3%+14.3%
Pirelli & C PIRC.MIItaly$8.27B+10%-1%-9%13.3×-2.4%+9.5%
Sumitomo Rubber Industries 5110.TJapan$3.40B+1%+5%8%9.8×-3.3%+8.8%
Toyo Tire 5105.TJapan$3.17B+6%+4%15%8.2×-7.3%+11.6%
Cheng Shin Rubber Ind 2105.TWTaiwan$2.95B-3%-1%9%20.3×-9.3%-1.2%
Apollo Tyres APOLLOTYRE.NSIndia$2.80B+1%+14%8%16.6×15.6%+10.7%
Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd. A 603049.SSChina$2.70B-19%+14%8%9.7×n/an/a
Qingdao Sentury Tire 002984.SZChina$2.62B-25%+2%8%16.7×3.4%+12.8%
Shandong Linglong Tyre 601966.SSChina$2.32B-19%+8%3%50.3×-0.4%+6.0%
Nokian Renkaat TYRES.HEFinland$2.21B+37%+5%6%27.4×19.4%+0.9%
Continental CON.DEGermany$15.8B+2%-35%n/a12.1×-0.2%-9.2%
Haian Rubber 001233.SZChina$1.82B+9%-4%23%25.6×1.8%+13.7%
CEAT CEATLTD.NSIndia$1.52B+6%+24%7%31.0×24.9%+15.5%
Qingdao Doublestar 000599.SZChina$1.45B-34%+390%8%n/a-2.9%+1.0%

Questions

Who are MRF's main competitors?
Named competitors: Apollo Tyres (APOLLOTYRE.NS), CEAT (CEATLTD.NS), JK Tyre & Industries (JKTYRE.NS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Hankook Tire & Technology (161390.KS), Sailun (601058.SS), LKQ (LKQ), Balkrishna Industries (BALKRISIND.NS), Yokohama Rubber (5101.T), Dorman Products (DORM).
Is MRF expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 25.7× against a peer median of 14.6×, 5th most expensive of 19 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 21% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +14%, so the hurdle is +7 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has MRF stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -3.6% against +1.6% for the median peer; over one year -20.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.