Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 000589.SZ Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd. Class A000589.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Consumer Discretionary›Automotive Aftermarket
Momentum strong 63
Mkt cap
$974M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
77%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$12.0M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
8.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+2.4 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
171 days
26 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥4.15
1D-0.5%
1W+2.2%
1M-1.7%
3M-5.9%
6M-17.5%
YTD-19.9%
1Y-12.8%
ATR %1.5%
52w lowhigh21.9% off high

What Guizhou Tyre does

Employees: 6,854

Guizhou Tyre at a glance

Size Guizhou Tyre (000589.SZ) is a China Consumer Discretionary company (Automotive Aftermarket) with a market value of $974M, the 2341st largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥4.15 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 17.5%, against -15.6% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 11th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 8.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.6%); the operating margin is 7.8% (peer median 6.9%).

Valuation It trades at 8.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 19.4× (4th cheapest of 15).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.4 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 26 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 84000589.SZ 83
Six months, rebased to 100: Guizhou Tyre against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Guizhou Tyre financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥11.7BCN¥10.9BCN¥10.7BCN¥9.58BCN¥8.43B
Revenue growth—+2%+11%+14%—
Gross profitCN¥2.69BCN¥1.91BCN¥1.84BCN¥2.03BCN¥1.34B
EBITDAn/aCN¥1.43BCN¥1.22BCN¥1.46BCN¥786M
Net incomeCN¥680MCN¥620MCN¥615MCN¥833MCN¥429M
Free cash flow-CN¥153M-CN¥659M-CN¥766MCN¥283M-CN¥1.10B
Capital expenditureCN¥1.25BCN¥1.48BCN¥1.52BCN¥1.74BCN¥1.03B
Total debtCN¥6.84BCN¥6.43BCN¥6.49BCN¥7.53BCN¥7.15B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Guizhou Tyre competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-30%-20%-10%0%+10%-10%0%+10%+20%SMPXPELJKTYRE0732406015007313GTBENGALASM601163000599CEATLTD210160046960018200123318092106TYRES002350601966000589.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Guizhou Tyre is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%0×20×40×SMPXPELJKTYRE0732406015007313601163CEATLTD00123318092106TYRES002350601966000589.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Guizhou Tyre is the large dot.

Guizhou Tyre competitors and peer comparison

How Guizhou Tyre compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Guizhou Tyre against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure000589.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-1.7%-5.0%8th highest of 21
6-month return-17.5%-15.6%11th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-21.9%-32.0%6th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+8.3%+6.6%10th highest of 21
Operating margin7.8%6.9%9th highest of 21
Forward P/E8.7×19.4×4th cheapest of 15
ROIC minus cost of capital+2.4 pp+0.0 pp8th highest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Guizhou Tyre 000589.SZChina$974M-18%+8%8%8.7×n/an/a
Standard Motor Products SMPUnited States$993M+10%+6%11%9.3×-8.5%+9.7%
XPEL XPELUnited States$1.06B-12%+13%14%16.5×n/an/a
JK Tyre & Industries JKTYRE.NSIndia$1.10B-12%+13%7%20.6×n/an/a
Kumhotire 073240.KSSouth Korea$1.12B-9%+2%12%4.2×n/an/a
Jiangsu General Science Technology 601500.SSChina$831M-25%+11%5%14.6×-3.5%+19.8%
TS Tech 7313.TJapan$1.25B-3%0%2%23.3×n/an/a
Goodyear Tire & Rubber GTUnited States$1.26B-33%-4%3%n/a5.9%+8.2%
Bengal & Assam BENGALASM.NSIndia$688M-13%+12%13%n/a19.9%-25.6%
Triangle Tyre 601163.SSChina$1.38B-21%+2%5%18.2×-7.2%+2.9%
Qingdao Doublestar 000599.SZChina$1.45B-34%+390%8%n/a-2.9%+1.0%
CEAT CEATLTD.NSIndia$1.52B+6%+24%7%31.0×24.9%+15.5%
Nankang Rubber Tire 2101.TWTaiwan$607M-18%+10%26%n/a-15.5%-2.8%
Aeolus Tire 600469.SSChina$598M-30%+2%4%n/an/an/a
Giti Tire 600182.SSChina$578M-22%-1%10%n/a-5.6%+11.6%
Haian Rubber 001233.SZChina$1.82B+9%-4%23%25.6×1.8%+13.7%
Prinx Chengshan 1809.HKHong Kong$508M-20%+9%9%2.4×n/an/a
Kenda Rubber Industrial 2106.TWTaiwan$461M-8%0%2%25.3×10.9%+2.3%
Nokian Renkaat TYRES.HEFinland$2.21B+37%+5%6%27.4×19.4%+0.9%
Nexen Tire 002350.KSSouth Korea$429M-19%+11%4%5.3×-20.0%+13.4%
Shandong Linglong Tyre 601966.SSChina$2.32B-19%+8%3%50.3×-0.4%+6.0%

Questions

Which companies are Guizhou Tyre's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Standard Motor Products (SMP), XPEL (XPEL), JK Tyre & Industries (JKTYRE.NS), Kumhotire (073240.KS), Jiangsu General Science Technology (601500.SS), TS Tech (7313.T), Goodyear Tire & Rubber (GT), Bengal & Assam (BENGALASM.NS).
Is Guizhou Tyre expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 8.7× against a peer median of 19.4×, 4th cheapest of 15 in its peer set.
How has Guizhou Tyre stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -17.5% against -15.6% for the median peer; over one year -12.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.