Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 600469.SS Aeolus Tire Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Aeolus Tire Co., Ltd. Class A600469.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Consumer Discretionary›Automotive Aftermarket
Momentum weak 23
Mkt cap
$598M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
53%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$4.94M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-0.2 pp
WACC 6.4%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
168 days
23 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥4.49
1D-1.1%
1W+2.0%
1M-8.9%
3M-16.7%
6M-29.7%
YTD-35.3%
1Y-29.6%
ATR %2.8%
52w lowhigh45.4% off high

What Aeolus Tire does

Employees: 5,973

Aeolus Tire at a glance

Size Aeolus Tire (600469.SS) is a China Consumer Discretionary company (Automotive Aftermarket) with a market value of $598M, the 3425th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥4.49 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 29.7%, against -16.9% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 2.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.5%); the operating margin is 3.6% (peer median 5.8%).

Valuation It trades at 0.7× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 0.9× (7th cheapest of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.2 points below its cost of capital (6.4% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 23 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

70809010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 82600469.SS 69
Six months, rebased to 100: Aeolus Tire against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Aeolus Tire financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥7.54BCN¥7.39BCN¥6.71BCN¥5.74BCN¥4.99B
Revenue growth—+10%+17%+15%—
Gross profitCN¥1.18BCN¥1.02BCN¥1.11BCN¥1.08BCN¥651M
EBITDAn/aCN¥728MCN¥662MCN¥703MCN¥411M
Net incomeCN¥93.9MCN¥236MCN¥281MCN¥349MCN¥84.5M
Free cash flow-CN¥166MCN¥89.0MCN¥46.2MCN¥197MCN¥383M
Capital expenditureCN¥456MCN¥407MCN¥155MCN¥282MCN¥67.6M
Total debtCN¥2.41BCN¥2.73BCN¥2.59BCN¥2.37BCN¥2.99B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Aeolus Tire competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-30%-20%-10%0%+10%-10%0%2101600182BENGALASM18092106601500002350SMPJTEKTINDIATVSSRICHAKXPELJKTYRE603335073240DBC7313GT601163000599600469.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Aeolus Tire is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%1×2×2101600182BENGALASM18092106601500002350000589SMPJTEKTINDIATVSSRICHAKXPELJKTYRE603335073240DBC7313GT601163000599600469.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Aeolus Tire is the large dot.

Aeolus Tire competitors and peer comparison

How Aeolus Tire compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Aeolus Tire against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure600469.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-8.9%-5.5%5th lowest of 21
6-month return-29.7%-16.9%3rd lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-45.4%-31.3%4th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+2.3%+8.5%8th lowest of 21
Operating margin3.6%5.8%6th lowest of 21
EV / Sales0.7×0.9×7th cheapest of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-0.2 pp-0.5 pp11th highest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Aeolus Tire 600469.SSChina$598M-30%+2%4%0.7×n/an/a
Nankang Rubber Tire 2101.TWTaiwan$607M-18%+10%26%2.0×-15.5%-2.8%
Giti Tire 600182.SSChina$578M-22%-1%10%1.2×-5.6%+11.6%
Bengal & Assam BENGALASM.NSIndia$688M-13%+12%13%2.7×19.9%-25.6%
Prinx Chengshan 1809.HKHong Kong$508M-20%+9%9%0.3×n/an/a
Kenda Rubber Industrial 2106.TWTaiwan$461M-8%0%2%0.8×10.9%+2.3%
Jiangsu General Science Technology 601500.SSChina$831M-25%+11%5%1.2×-3.5%+19.8%
Nexen Tire 002350.KSSouth Korea$429M-19%+11%4%0.2×-20.0%+13.4%
Guizhou Tyre 000589.SZChina$974M-18%+8%8%0.9×n/an/a
Standard Motor Products SMPUnited States$993M+10%+6%11%0.8×-8.5%+9.7%
JTEKT India JTEKTINDIA.NSIndia$347M-16%+17%4%1.2×n/an/a
TVS Srichakra TVSSRICHAK.NSIndia$346M+9%+19%4%0.8×24.3%+13.4%
XPEL XPELUnited States$1.06B-12%+13%14%2.1×n/an/a
JK Tyre & Industries JKTYRE.NSIndia$1.10B-12%+13%7%0.9×n/an/a
Guangdong Dcenti Auto Parts Stock 603335.SSChina$322M-29%-18%-11%3.4×n/an/a
Kumhotire 073240.KSSouth Korea$1.12B-9%+2%12%0.3×n/an/a
Firma Oponiarska Debica DBC.WAPoland$308M0%-1%4%0.4×-1.6%+9.9%
TS Tech 7313.TJapan$1.25B-3%0%2%0.3×n/an/a
Goodyear Tire & Rubber GTUnited States$1.26B-33%-4%3%0.5×5.9%+8.2%
Triangle Tyre 601163.SSChina$1.38B-21%+2%5%0.8×-7.2%+2.9%
Qingdao Doublestar 000599.SZChina$1.45B-34%+390%8%1.3×-2.9%+1.0%

Questions

Which companies are Aeolus Tire's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Nankang Rubber Tire (2101.TW), Giti Tire (600182.SS), Bengal & Assam (BENGALASM.NS), Prinx Chengshan (1809.HK), Kenda Rubber Industrial (2106.TW), Jiangsu General Science Technology (601500.SS), Nexen Tire (002350.KS), Guizhou Tyre (000589.SZ).
Is Aeolus Tire expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 0.7× against a peer median of 0.9×, 7th cheapest of 21 in its peer set.
How has Aeolus Tire stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -29.7% against -16.9% for the median peer; over one year -29.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.