Loading…

Cadence Design SystemsCDNSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Information Technology›Packaged Software

Makes electronic design automation (EDA) software engineers use to design and verify computer chips.

Momentum weak 39
Mkt cap
$87.8B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$837M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
34.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+7.6 pp
WACC 10.2%
Hurdle
+15 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
A- / A
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
109 days
23 Feb 2027
Close · USD$319.92
1D+2.7%
1W-2.4%
1M-8.3%
3M-3.6%
6M-11.8%
YTD+2.4%
1Y-2.4%
ATR %4.4%
Beta1.61
52w lowhigh23.2% off high

What Cadence Design Systems does

Makes electronic design automation (EDA) software engineers use to design and verify computer chips.

Sells design software mainly on multi-year licences that renew, and also sells emulation machines, the specialist hardware chipmakers use to test designs before manufacture. A third line is ready-made circuit blocks, called IP, licensed to chip designers.

Products and services

  • Digital & Signoff design tools
  • Custom IC / analog design tools
  • Verification (emulation/simulation)
  • IP licensing & system design/analysis

Customers

  • semiconductor companies
  • systems/electronics OEMs

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Semiconductor design software
  • EDA / chip design tools
  • Digital & custom IC design…

What could go right

  • Rising chip design complexity (AI chips)
  • IP licensing growth

What could go wrong

  • Customer concentration among large chipmakers
  • Export-control exposure (China sales)

Moat: wide (switching costs, IP / patents, installed base). Chip design flows are built around EDA tools over years; switching mid-design is essentially impossible.

Headquarters: San Jose, California, US · Founded: 1988 · Employees: 13,800

Named competitors

Cadence Design Systems at a glance

Size Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) is a United States Information Technology company (Packaged Software) with a market value of $87.8B, the 150th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $319.92 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 11.8%, against +9.4% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 17.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +23.1%); the operating margin is 29.9% (peer median 9.9%).

Valuation It trades at 34.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 22.4× (7th most expensive of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 30% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +15%, so the hurdle is +15 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 7.6 points above its cost of capital (10.2% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $8.20B at 30 Sep 2026, up 17% on a year earlier — 1.3 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Credit Cadence Design Systems has 3 bonds outstanding ($2.50B), rated A- by the agencies and trading like A at a weighted spread of 69 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 2.0% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 23 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 112CDNS 88
Six months, rebased to 100: Cadence Design Systems against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Cadence Design Systems financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$6.13B$5.30B$4.64B$4.09B$3.56B
Revenue growth—+14%+13%+15%—
Gross profit$5.15B$4.53B$3.96B$3.64B$3.17B
EBITDA$2.22B$1.90B$1.58B$1.41B$1.21B
Net income$1.38B$1.11B$1.06B$1.04B$849M
Free cash flow$1.76B$1.59B$1.12B$1.25B$1.12B
Capital expenditure$204M$142M$143M$103M$124M
Total debt$2.81B$2.67B$2.63B$806M$924M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Cadence Design Systems competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+25%+50%+75%-20%0%+20%SNPSINTUPRXADBESNOWNOWDDOGAPPADSKCSUROPCRMDSYTEAMNBISCRWDZSTWLOPANWOKTACDNS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Cadence Design Systems is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%0×50×100×150×SNPSINTUPRXADBESNOWNOWDDOGAPPADSKCRMDSYTEAMCRWDZSTWLOPANWOKTACDNSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Cadence Design Systems is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%+60%0%20%40%60%SNPSINTUPRXADBESNOWNOWAPPADSKCSUROPCRMDSYTEAMCRWDZSTWLOOKTACDNSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Cadence Design Systems is the large dot.

Cadence Design Systems competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (CDNS vs SNPS vs SIE.DE vs KEYS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Cadence Design Systems CDNS$87.8B-12%+18%30%34.0×29.9%
Synopsys SNPS$86.3B-13%+46%12%25.6×39.2%
Siemens SIE.DE$225B-4%+4%13%23.4×18.3%
Keysight Technologies KEYS$46.3B-24%+26%24%20.3×20.9%
Silvaco SVCOn/a-39%n/an/an/an/a
Empyrean Technology 301269.SZ$7.70B+5%+15%-10%357.4×n/a
Zuken 6947.T$699M+12%+12%14%18.5×-6.8%

How Cadence Design Systems compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Cadence Design Systems against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureCDNSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-8.3%-7.5%11th highest of 21
6-month return-11.8%+9.4%4th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-23.2%-31.1%7th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+17.6%+23.1%8th lowest of 21
Operating margin29.9%9.9%3rd highest of 21
Forward P/E34.0×22.4×7th most expensive of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)29.9%28.2%8th most demanding of 18
Growth delivered (Del g)+14.6%+23.5%8th lowest of 18
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+15.4 pp+2.4 pp4th most demanding of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital+7.6 pp-1.7 pp7th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA40.1×24.1×4th most expensive of 14
Net debt / EBITDA0.6×0.1×8th most indebted of 20
Bond spread69 bp95 bp2nd tightest of 15

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Cadence Design Systems CDNSUnited States$87.8B-12%+18%30%34.0×29.9%+14.6%
Synopsys SNPSUnited States$86.3B-13%+46%12%25.6×39.2%+13.9%
Intuit INTUUnited States$91.3B-14%+14%29%14.8×3.1%+17.4%
Prosus PRX.ASNetherlands$83.9B-3%+45%3%10.1×55.8%+13.8%
Adobe ADBEUnited States$93.1B-5%+12%36%8.9×0.9%+13.1%
SNOW SNOWUnited States$97.3B+81%+32%-22%108.4×41.3%+51.2%
ServiceNow NOWUnited States$106B+12%+22%13%22.4×29.5%+24.1%
Datadog DDOGUnited States$64.3B-11%+33%2%61.0×n/an/a
AppLovin APPUnited States$131B-16%+29%78%20.0×28.2%+30.4%
Autodesk ADSKUnited States$54.7B+7%+19%23%20.1×18.1%+13.7%
Constellation Software CSU.TOCanada$53.3B+37%+17%16%19.7×11.2%+25.0%
Roper Technologies ROPUnited States$47.2B+39%+9%28%19.7×12.7%+10.2%
Salesforce CRMUnited States$176B+18%+11%22%14.6×13.7%+14.3%
Dassault Systemes DSY.PAFrance$39.0B+32%0%26%19.2×8.3%+7.0%
Atlassian TEAMUnited States$38.7B+5%+26%4%28.7×44.7%+25.8%
NBIS NBISUnited States$35.2B-8%+461%-49%n/an/an/a
CrowdStrike CRWDUnited States$222B+64%+24%-1%153.6×52.4%+40.6%
Zscaler ZSUnited States$32.2B+30%+25%-4%40.5×20.7%+37.9%
Twilio TWLOUnited States$31.3B0%+19%8%30.7×38.2%+23.5%
Palo Alto Networks PANWUnited States$257B+51%+24%5%75.0×n/an/a
Okta OKTAUnited States$29.5B+101%+11%8%41.3×39.2%+28.4%

Cadence Design Systems bonds and credit

Cadence Design Systems has 3 bonds outstanding with $2.50B face value. The agencies rate it A-; its bonds trade like A. Weighted yield 5.33%, a spread of 69 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Cadence Design Systems backlog

Cadence Design Systems reported $8.20B of remaining performance obligations at 30 Sep 2026, up 17% from a year earlier and up 1% from the previous quarter. That is 1.3 years of trailing revenue already under contract. Book-to-bill last quarter: 1.06.

Questions

Who are Cadence Design Systems's main competitors?
Named competitors: Synopsys (SNPS), Siemens EDA (Mentor Graphics) (SIE.DE), Keysight Technologies (KEYS), Silvaco Group (SVCO), Empyrean Technology (301269.SZ), Zuken (6947.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Synopsys (SNPS), Intuit (INTU), Prosus (PRX.AS), Adobe (ADBE), SNOW (SNOW), ServiceNow (NOW).
Is Cadence Design Systems expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 34.0× against a peer median of 22.4×, 7th most expensive of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 30% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +15%, so the hurdle is +15 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Cadence Design Systems stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -11.8% against +9.4% for the median peer; over one year -2.4%.
What is Cadence Design Systems's backlog?
Cadence Design Systems's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $8.20B at 30 Sep 2026, +17% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.