Loading…

Roper TechnologiesROPCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Information Technology›Packaged Software

US diversified technology holding company owning niche software and engineered-product businesses across many industries.

Momentum leader 94
Mkt cap
$47.2B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$509M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
19.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-1.2 pp
WACC 7.7%
Hurdle
+2 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BBB+ / BBB
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
89 days
3 Feb 2027
Close · USD$476.60
1D-2.9%
1W+2.1%
1M+30.9%
3M+18.0%
6M+38.8%
YTD+7.6%
1Y+7.4%
ATR %3.0%
Beta0.02
52w lowhigh6.0% off high

What Roper Technologies does

US diversified technology holding company owning niche software and engineered-product businesses across many industries.

Runs as a buyer of niche software firms, leaving each to operate independently while headquarters collects the cash and redeploys it into further purchases. It was an industrial manufacturer until a shift over the last decade that ended with the 2022 sale of its industrial businesses; most revenue now comes from subscriptions and maintenance.

Products and services

  • Application software (vertical market)
  • Network software (payments, insurance)
  • Technology-enabled products (medical/industrial)

Customers

  • Niche B2B end markets (healthcare, insurance, indu

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Diversified technology/software
  • Vertical market software + engineered…
  • Healthcare, industrial, technology end…

What could go right

  • Recurring software revenue growth
  • Disciplined M&A capital deployment

What could go wrong

  • Acquisition-dependent growth model risk
  • Integration execution risk on larger deals

Moat: wide (switching costs, scale, distribution). Portfolio of #1/#2 niche software franchises with sticky recurring revenue, run on a decentralized M&A model.

Headquarters: Sarasota, Florida, US · Founded: 1981 · Employees: 19,400

Named competitors

Roper Technologies at a glance

Size Roper Technologies (ROP) is a United States Information Technology company (Packaged Software) with a market value of $47.2B, the 268th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $476.60 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 38.8%, against +0.2% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 9.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +25.4%); the operating margin is 28.1% (peer median 7.6%).

Valuation It trades at 19.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 25.6× (6th cheapest of 18).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 13% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +10%, so the hurdle is +2 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.2 points below its cost of capital (7.7% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $5.43B at 30 Sep 2026, up 13% on a year earlier — 0.6 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Credit Roper Technologies has 12 bonds outstanding ($8.50B), rated BBB+ by the agencies and trading like BBB at a weighted spread of 87 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 5.0% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 3 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012014011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026ROP 145Peer median 102
Six months, rebased to 100: Roper Technologies against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Roper Technologies financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$8.43B$7.90B$7.04B$6.18B$5.37B
Revenue growth—+12%+14%+15%—
Gross profit$5.88B$5.47B$4.88B$4.31B$3.75B
EBITDA$3.29B$3.13B$2.81B$2.50B$2.17B
Net income$2.59B$1.54B$1.55B$1.36B$1.19B
Free cash flow$2.58B$2.49B$2.33B$1.97B$694M
Capital expenditure$106M$105M$111M$108M$70.3M
Total debt$9.72B$9.53B$7.82B$6.53B$6.87B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Roper Technologies competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%-25%0%+25%CSUADSKDSYTEAMNBISDDOGZSTWLOOKTAAMSPRX2513ZMSNPSCRWVCDNSMDBINTUIOTROP6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Roper Technologies is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+25%+50%+75%+100%20×40×60×CSUADSKDSYTEAMDDOGZSTWLOOKTABSPAMSPRXZMSNPSCDNSMDBIOTROPRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Roper Technologies is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+25%+50%+75%+100%0%50%100%CSUADSKDSYTEAMZSTWLOOKTABSPAMSPRXZMSNPSCDNSMDBROPGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Roper Technologies is the large dot.

Roper Technologies competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (ROP vs DHR vs CSU.TO vs HON)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Roper Technologies ROP$47.2B+39%+9%28%19.7×12.7%
Danaher DHR$162B+35%+6%21%25.3×20.5%
Constellation Software CSU.TO$53.3B+37%+17%16%19.7×11.2%
Honeywell Technologies HON$69.8B-1%-17%18%23.2×4.1%
Fortive FTV$19.5B+8%-22%20%20.0×17.2%

How Roper Technologies compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Roper Technologies against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureROPPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+30.9%-6.7%highest of 21
6-month return+38.8%+0.2%2nd highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-6.0%-31.3%3rd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+9.2%+25.4%4th lowest of 21
Operating margin28.1%7.6%3rd highest of 21
Forward P/E19.7×25.6×6th cheapest of 18
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)12.7%27.9%6th least demanding of 16
Growth delivered (Del g)+10.2%+23.5%2nd lowest of 16
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+2.4 pp+1.3 pp8th most demanding of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital-1.2 pp-4.5 pp9th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA17.2×26.6×6th cheapest of 14
Net debt / EBITDA2.9×-0.0×4th most indebted of 20
Bond spread87 bp100 bp5th tightest of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Roper Technologies ROPUnited States$47.2B+39%+9%28%19.7×12.7%+10.2%
Constellation Software CSU.TOCanada$53.3B+37%+17%16%19.7×11.2%+25.0%
Autodesk ADSKUnited States$54.7B+7%+19%23%20.1×18.1%+13.7%
Dassault Systemes DSY.PAFrance$39.0B+32%0%26%19.2×8.3%+7.0%
Atlassian TEAMUnited States$38.7B+5%+26%4%28.7×44.7%+25.8%
NBIS NBISUnited States$35.2B-8%+461%-49%n/an/an/a
Datadog DDOGUnited States$64.3B-11%+33%2%61.0×n/an/a
Zscaler ZSUnited States$32.2B+30%+25%-4%40.5×20.7%+37.9%
Twilio TWLOUnited States$31.3B0%+19%8%30.7×38.2%+23.5%
Okta OKTAUnited States$29.5B+101%+11%8%41.3×39.2%+28.4%
Bending Spoons BSPUnited States$27.9Bn/a+95%21%25.6×45.5%+94.7%
Amadeus IT AMS.MCSpain$27.4B+18%+4%27%17.8×4.3%+24.6%
Prosus PRX.ASNetherlands$83.9B-3%+45%3%10.1×55.8%+13.8%
Z.AI Co., Ltd. -H- Reg S 2513.HKHong Kong$26.5B-56%+132%-272%n/an/an/a
Zoom Communications ZMUnited States$26.2B-18%+5%24%14.7×5.8%+12.9%
Synopsys SNPSUnited States$86.3B-13%+46%12%25.6×39.2%+13.9%
CoreWeave CRWVUnited States$25.6B-59%+115%-3%n/an/an/a
Cadence Design Systems CDNSUnited States$87.8B-12%+18%30%34.0×29.9%+14.6%
MongoDB MDBUnited States$25.2B+4%+25%-1%44.7×27.9%+33.1%
Intuit INTUUnited States$91.3B-14%+14%29%14.8×3.1%+17.4%
Samsara IOTUnited States$24.0B+38%+30%1%48.5×n/an/a

Roper Technologies bonds and credit

Roper Technologies has 12 bonds outstanding with $8.50B face value. The agencies rate it BBB+; its bonds trade like BBB. Weighted yield 5.47%, a spread of 87 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Roper Technologies backlog

Roper Technologies reported $5.43B of remaining performance obligations at 30 Sep 2026, up 13% from a year earlier and up 4% from the previous quarter. That is 0.6 years of trailing revenue already under contract. Book-to-bill last quarter: 1.09.

Questions

Who are Roper Technologies's main competitors?
Named competitors: Danaher (DHR), Constellation Software (CSU.TO), Honeywell (HON), Fortive (FTV). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Constellation Software (CSU.TO), Autodesk (ADSK), Dassault Systemes (DSY.PA), Atlassian (TEAM), NBIS (NBIS), Datadog (DDOG).
Is Roper Technologies expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 19.7× against a peer median of 25.6×, 6th cheapest of 18 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 13% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +10%, so the hurdle is +2 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Roper Technologies stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +38.8% against +0.2% for the median peer; over one year +7.4%.
What is Roper Technologies's backlog?
Roper Technologies's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $5.43B at 30 Sep 2026, +13% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.