Loading…

Arm Holdings plcARMCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Information Technology›Semiconductors

Licenses the CPU architecture and processor designs used in nearly all smartphones and a growing share of servers and PCs.

≈ Royalty-based chip 'Switzerland' — licenses designs rather than making chipsMomentum laggard 12
Mkt cap
$204B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$1.25B
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
67.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-6.4 pp
WACC 19.8%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
89 days
3 Feb 2027
Close · USD$174.62
1D+4.7%
1W-15.2%
1M-36.6%
3M-34.8%
6M-18.1%
YTD+59.8%
1Y+9.0%
ATR %9.0%
Beta3.40
52w lowhigh61.4% off high

What Arm does

Licenses the CPU architecture and processor designs used in nearly all smartphones and a growing share of servers and PCs.

Does not make chips; it sells designs. Customers pay a licence fee up front to use its architecture or core designs, then a royalty on every chip they ship later, so earnings follow other companies' chip volumes. SoftBank still owns most of it; it listed on Nasdaq in 2023.

In one line: Royalty-based chip 'Switzerland' — licenses designs rather than making chips.

Products and services

  • Architecture licenses
  • CPU core designs (Cortex, Neoverse)
  • Compute subsystems (CSS)

Customers

  • Apple
  • Qualcomm
  • Samsung
  • MediaTek
  • Cloud providers (server chips)

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Semiconductors
  • CPU architecture licensing
  • IP core design

What could go right

  • Server/data-center Arm adoption (AWS Graviton etc.)
  • Rising royalty rates per chip (v9)

What could go wrong

  • RISC-V as a free long-term alternative
  • Customer concentration/governance ties to SoftBank

Moat: wide (IP / patents, network effects, switching costs). Virtually every mobile chip is built on Arm's architecture; decades of software/tooling ecosystem lock-in.

Headquarters: Cambridge, United Kingdom · Founded: 1990 · Employees: 9,584

Named competitors

Arm at a glance

Size Arm (ARM) is a United States Information Technology company (Semiconductors) with a market value of $204B, the 56th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $174.62 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 18.1%, against -14.1% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 8th lowest of 19 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 25.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +23.7%); the operating margin is 17.3% (peer median 26.5%).

Valuation It trades at 67.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 24.6× (2nd most expensive of 20).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 6.4 points below its cost of capital (19.8% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $2.42B at 30 Sep 2026, up 8% on a year earlier — 0.4 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Short interest Short interest is 1.7% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 3 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015020011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026ARM 82Peer median 82
Six months, rebased to 100: Arm against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Arm financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$5.16B$4.92B$4.01B$3.23B$2.68B
Revenue growth—+23%+24%+21%—
Gross profit$4.84B$4.55B$3.80B$3.00B$2.48B
EBITDA$1.15B$1.14B$1.01B$261M$848M
Net income$1.04B$904M$792M$306M$524M
Free cash flow$1.51B$979M$178M$998M$675M
Capital expenditure$622M$575M$239M$143M$93.0M
Total debt$485M$491M$356M$226M$219M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Arm competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%+150%-40%-20%0%KLACQCOMADITXN2454INTCMRVL285A0981ASML6882563711000660IFXNXPITELMPWRARM6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Arm is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+100%+200%0×25×50×75×KLACQCOMADIINTC285A330809816882563711000660IFXMPWRARMRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Arm is the large dot.

Arm competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (ARM vs INTC vs AMD vs 6533.TW)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Arm ARM$204B-18%+25%17%67.7×n/a
Intel INTC$299B-55%+12%11%39.9×46.1%
Advanced Micro Devices AMD$733B-1%+42%18%30.0×60.9%
Andes Technology 6533.TW$343M-12%+26%-21%61.3×24.6%
Synopsys SNPS$86.3B-13%+46%12%25.6×39.2%
Cadence Design Systems CDNS$87.8B-12%+18%30%34.0×29.9%
CEVA CEVA$763M-27%+9%-10%39.7×n/a

How Arm compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Arm against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureARMPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-36.6%-21.8%4th lowest of 21
6-month return-18.1%-14.1%8th lowest of 19
Distance from 52-week high-61.4%-37.1%2nd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+25.1%+23.7%10th highest of 21
Operating margin17.3%26.5%8th lowest of 21
Forward P/E67.7×24.6×2nd most expensive of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital-6.4 pp+3.6 pp5th lowest of 21
Net debt / EBITDA-3.0×0.4×2nd least indebted of 17

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Arm ARMUnited States$204B-18%+25%17%67.7×n/an/a
KLA KLACUnited States$180B-26%+16%43%22.3×23.5%+14.4%
Qualcomm QCOMUnited States$177B-24%+2%24%17.0×15.9%+5.1%
Analog Devices ADIUnited States$176B-13%+34%36%22.4×27.8%+14.5%
Texas Instruments TXNUnited States$253B-4%+20%41%24.6×23.3%+4.1%
Mediatek 2454.TWTaiwan$164B+7%+6%15%24.7×40.7%+13.1%
Intel INTCUnited States$299B-55%+12%11%39.9×46.1%-7.5%
Marvell Technology MRVLUnited States$124B-17%+31%17%25.0×54.4%+22.5%
CXMT 688825.SSChina$411Bn/a+156%13%n/an/an/a
Kioxia 285A.TJapan$88.9B+139%+265%70%2.5×-3.0%+18.8%
Zhongji Innolight 3308.HKHong Kong$80.7Bn/a+177%41%16.7×27.6%+39.3%
SMIC 0981.HKHong Kong$76.7B-41%+20%9%32.9×n/an/a
ASML ASML.ASNetherlands$550B-6%+23%39%31.1×28.9%+18.5%
Cambricon Technologies 688256.SSChina$75.7B-30%+104%33%87.3×n/an/a
Ase Technology 3711.TWTaiwan$70.4B+2%+25%11%17.3×n/an/a
SK hynix 000660.KSSouth Korea$608B-12%+220%74%3.1×-3.1%+24.9%
Infineon Technologies IFX.DEGermany$66.8B-33%+6%13%26.0×30.2%+11.3%
NXP Semiconductors NXPIUnited States$62.6B-15%+15%30%14.1×16.3%+7.3%
TE Connectivity TELUnited States$59.5B+1%+15%22%15.1×8.2%+5.9%
Monolithic Power Systems MPWRUnited States$58.1B-26%+40%30%28.3×39.6%+27.0%
Advanced Micro Devices AMDUnited States$733B-1%+42%18%30.0×60.9%+28.8%

Arm backlog

Arm reported $2.42B of remaining performance obligations at 30 Sep 2026, up 8% from a year earlier and up 14% from the previous quarter. That is 0.4 years of trailing revenue already under contract. Book-to-bill last quarter: 1.21.

Questions

Who are Arm's main competitors?
Named competitors: RISC-V (open ecosystem) (private or unlisted), Intel (x86) (INTC), AMD (x86) (AMD), Andes Technology (6533.TW), Synopsys (SNPS), Cadence Design Systems (CDNS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes KLA (KLAC), Qualcomm (QCOM), Analog Devices (ADI), Texas Instruments (TXN), Mediatek (2454.TW), Intel (INTC).
Is Arm expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 67.7× against a peer median of 24.6×, 2nd most expensive of 20 in its peer set.
How has Arm stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -18.1% against -14.1% for the median peer; over one year +9.0%.
What is Arm's backlog?
Arm's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $2.42B at 30 Sep 2026, +8% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.