Loading…

KLA CorporationKLACCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Information Technology›Semiconductors

Makes process-control and inspection equipment that finds defects on chip wafers during manufacturing.

Momentum laggard 13
Mkt cap
$180B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$2.25B
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
22.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+50.9 pp
WACC 12.1%
Hurdle
+9 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
A / A-
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
90 days
4 Feb 2027
Close · USD$138.49
1D+6.7%
1W-12.3%
1M-29.6%
3M-28.1%
6M-25.8%
YTD+14.3%
1Y+13.3%
ATR %6.8%
Beta2.68
52w lowhigh54.9% off high

What KLA does

Makes process-control and inspection equipment that finds defects on chip wafers during manufacturing.

Sells systems that fabs install at each new chip generation, then earns a steady flow from servicing and upgrading them. Customers are the few chipmakers building leading-edge chips, so its sales follow their spending plans. Process control is its sole focus, unlike broader equipment rivals.

Products and services

  • Wafer inspection systems
  • Patterning/metrology tools
  • Reticle inspection

Customers

  • TSMC
  • Samsung Electronics
  • Intel
  • SK hynix
  • Micron

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Semiconductors
  • Wafer-fab equipment
  • Process control/metrology & inspection

What could go right

  • Leading-edge and advanced-packaging capex
  • AI-driven wafer complexity (more inspection steps)

What could go wrong

  • Semiconductor capex cyclicality
  • China export restrictions

Moat: wide (scale, installed base, process know-how). Dominant share in defect inspection; fabs standardize on its tools across a node's life, raising switching costs.

Headquarters: Milpitas, California, US · Founded: 1975 · Employees: 17,200

Named competitors

KLA at a glance

Size KLA (KLAC) is a United States Information Technology company (Semiconductors) with a market value of $180B, the 67th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $138.49 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 25.8%, against -14.1% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 5th lowest of 19 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 15.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +23.7%); the operating margin is 42.7% (peer median 22.6%).

Valuation It trades at 22.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 24.7× (8th cheapest of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 23% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +14%, so the hurdle is +9 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 50.9 points above its cost of capital (12.1% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $7.86B at 30 Jun 2025, down 20% on a year earlier — 0.6 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Credit KLA has 8 bonds outstanding ($5.95B), rated A by the agencies and trading like A- at a weighted spread of 78 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 1.9% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 4 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 82KLAC 75
Six months, rebased to 100: KLA against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

KLA financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2026-06-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023
Revenue$14.5B$13.6B$12.1B$9.79B$10.5B
Revenue growth—+12%+24%-6%—
Gross profit$8.81B$8.27B$7.39B$5.99B$6.17B
EBITDA$6.59B$6.02B$5.42B$4.22B$4.43B
Net income$5.26B$4.83B$4.06B$2.76B$3.39B
Free cash flow$4.04B$3.77B$3.75B$3.03B$3.33B
Capital expenditure$475M$376M$335M$277M$342M
Total debt$5.99B$6.15B$6.09B$6.82B$6.06B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

KLA competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%+150%-40%-20%0%QCOMADI2454ARMTXNMRVLINTC285A09816882563711IFXNXPITELASMLMPWR000660009150KLAC6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. KLA is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+100%+200%0×25×50×75×QCOMADI2454ARMMRVLINTC285A330809816882563711MPWR000660KLACRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. KLA is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%QCOMADI2454TXNMRVLINTC285A3308IFXNXPITELASMLMPWR000660009150KLACGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. KLA is the large dot.

KLA competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (KLAC vs AMAT vs LRCX vs ASML)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
KLA KLAC$180B-26%+16%43%22.3×23.5%
Applied Materials AMAT$264B-24%+8%31%18.8×25.5%
Lam Research LRCX$250B-32%+33%37%19.6×26.4%
ASML Holding N.V. - New York Re ASML$574B-11%+29%39%22.4×26.4%
ONTO ONTO$8.50B-39%+8%20%16.9×29.4%
NVMI NVMI$9.96B-40%+16%29%25.0×32.8%
Camtek CAMT$4.53B-53%+12%23%19.6×29.7%
Lasertec 6920.T$18.2B-25%-19%44%28.7×28.9%

How KLA compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

KLA against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureKLACPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-29.6%-21.8%8th lowest of 21
6-month return-25.8%-14.1%5th lowest of 19
Distance from 52-week high-54.9%-43.3%7th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+15.8%+23.7%7th lowest of 21
Operating margin42.7%22.6%3rd highest of 21
Forward P/E22.3×24.7×8th cheapest of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)23.5%27.8%7th least demanding of 16
Growth delivered (Del g)+14.4%+13.1%8th highest of 16
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+9.0 pp+12.6 pp6th least demanding of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital+50.9 pp+3.0 pp4th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA27.6×16.8×5th most expensive of 15
Net debt / EBITDA0.2×0.5×7th least indebted of 16
Bond spread78 bp78 bp6th widest of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
KLA KLACUnited States$180B-26%+16%43%22.3×23.5%+14.4%
Qualcomm QCOMUnited States$177B-24%+2%24%17.0×15.9%+5.1%
Analog Devices ADIUnited States$176B-13%+34%36%22.4×27.8%+14.5%
Mediatek 2454.TWTaiwan$164B+7%+6%15%24.7×40.7%+13.1%
Arm ARMUnited States$204B-18%+25%17%67.7×n/an/a
Texas Instruments TXNUnited States$253B-4%+20%41%24.6×23.3%+4.1%
Marvell Technology MRVLUnited States$124B-17%+31%17%25.0×54.4%+22.5%
Intel INTCUnited States$299B-55%+12%11%39.9×46.1%-7.5%
Kioxia 285A.TJapan$88.9B+139%+265%70%2.5×-3.0%+18.8%
Zhongji Innolight 3308.HKHong Kong$80.7Bn/a+177%41%16.7×27.6%+39.3%
CXMT 688825.SSChina$411Bn/a+156%13%n/an/an/a
SMIC 0981.HKHong Kong$76.7B-41%+20%9%32.9×n/an/a
Cambricon Technologies 688256.SSChina$75.7B-30%+104%33%87.3×n/an/a
Ase Technology 3711.TWTaiwan$70.4B+2%+25%11%17.3×n/an/a
Infineon Technologies IFX.DEGermany$66.8B-33%+6%13%26.0×30.2%+11.3%
NXP Semiconductors NXPIUnited States$62.6B-15%+15%30%14.1×16.3%+7.3%
TE Connectivity TELUnited States$59.5B+1%+15%22%15.1×8.2%+5.9%
ASML ASML.ASNetherlands$550B-6%+23%39%31.1×28.9%+18.5%
Monolithic Power Systems MPWRUnited States$58.1B-26%+40%30%28.3×39.6%+27.0%
SK hynix 000660.KSSouth Korea$608B-12%+220%74%3.1×-3.1%+24.9%
SamsungElecMech 009150.KSSouth Korea$47.2B+5%+22%12%38.7×42.8%+7.9%

KLA bonds and credit

KLA has 8 bonds outstanding with $5.95B face value. The agencies rate it A; its bonds trade like A-. Weighted yield 5.74%, a spread of 78 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

KLA backlog

KLA reported $7.86B of remaining performance obligations at 30 Jun 2025, down 20% from a year earlier and down 12% from the previous quarter. That is 0.6 years of trailing revenue already under contract. Book-to-bill last quarter: 0.67.

Questions

Who are KLA's main competitors?
Named competitors: Applied Materials (AMAT), Lam Research (LRCX), ASML (ASML), Hitachi High-Tech (private or unlisted), Onto Innovation (ONTO), Nova (NVMI). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Qualcomm (QCOM), Analog Devices (ADI), Mediatek (2454.TW), Arm (ARM), Texas Instruments (TXN), Marvell Technology (MRVL).
Is KLA expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 22.3× against a peer median of 24.7×, 8th cheapest of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 23% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +14%, so the hurdle is +9 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has KLA stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -25.8% against -14.1% for the median peer; over one year +13.3%.
What is KLA's backlog?
KLA's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $7.86B at 30 Jun 2025, -20% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.