Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 688825.SS CXMT Corporation Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

CXMT Corporation Class A688825.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Semiconductors

China's largest DRAM memory chipmaker, supplying memory chips for servers, phones, PCs and cars.

≈ China's Micron Technology
Mkt cap
$411B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$2.10B
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-14.8 pp
WACC 16.4%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
117 days
3 Mar 2027
Close · CNYCN¥40.41
1D-5.0%
1W-3.3%
1M-20.0%
3M-26.5%
6Mn/a
YTDn/a
1Yn/a
ATR %7.0%
52w lowhigh34.6% off high

What CXMT does

China's largest DRAM memory chipmaker, supplying memory chips for servers, phones, PCs and cars.

Sells standard DRAM, whose price is set by the global market, mostly to Chinese phone, PC and server makers that want a domestic supplier. It ranks well behind Samsung, SK hynix and Micron in scale and process technology.

In one line: China's Micron Technology.

Products and services

  • DRAM chips (DDR4/DDR5)
  • LPDDR mobile memory
  • Server/enterprise memory

Customers

  • Alibaba
  • ByteDance
  • Tencent
  • Lenovo
  • Xiaomi

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Semiconductors
  • Memory chips
  • DRAM design, fabrication & sale

What could go right

  • China's push for domestic memory self-sufficiency
  • Global memory upcycle (AI-driven demand)

What could go wrong

  • US export-control restrictions on equipment/IP
  • Capital-intensive catch-up to leaders' process nodes

Moat: narrow (scale, IP / patents, installed base). Only Chinese DRAM maker at meaningful scale, backed by huge state/investor capital and Hefei government ownership.

Headquarters: Hefei, Anhui, China · Founded: 2016

Named competitors

CXMT at a glance

Size CXMT (688825.SS) is a China Information Technology company (Semiconductors) with a market value of $411B, the 2nd largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥40.41 on 6 Nov 2026.

Growth Revenue grew 156.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +27.9%); the operating margin is 12.9% (peer median 37.2%).

Valuation It trades at 43.9× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 12.3× (most expensive of 15).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 14.8 points below its cost of capital (16.4% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 3 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

CXMT financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenuen/aCN¥61.5BCN¥24.0BCN¥8.98BCN¥8.28B
Revenue growth—+156%+167%+8%—
Gross profitn/aCN¥23.1BCN¥367M-CN¥281M-CN¥740M
EBITDAn/aCN¥35.0BCN¥8.36B-CN¥6.63B-CN¥1.83B
Net incomen/aCN¥1.87B-CN¥7.14B-CN¥16.3B-CN¥8.33B
Free cash flown/a-CN¥13.0B-CN¥64.2B-CN¥50.8B-CN¥37.1B
Capital expendituren/aCN¥49.7BCN¥71.2BCN¥43.7BCN¥35.4B
Total debtCN¥140BCN¥149BCN¥131BCN¥102BCN¥69.1B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

CXMT competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+100%+200%0×20×40×ASMLINTC000660TXNAMDMUARM005930QCOMAVGO688825.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. CXMT is the large dot.

CXMT competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (688825.SS vs 005930.KS vs 000660.KS vs MU)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq g
CXMT 688825.SS$411Bn/a+156%13%43.9×n/a
SamsungElec 005930.KS$886B-14%+88%46%2.0×-7.2%
SK hynix 000660.KS$608B-12%+220%74%3.1×-3.1%
Micron Technology MU$781B-8%+256%75%5.6×7.1%

How CXMT compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

CXMT against its 14 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure688825.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-20.0%-29.7%5th highest of 15
Distance from 52-week high-34.6%-42.8%5th highest of 15
Revenue growth (TTM)+156.2%+27.9%3rd highest of 15
Operating margin12.9%37.2%2nd lowest of 15
EV / Sales43.9×12.3×most expensive of 15
ROIC minus cost of capital-14.8 pp+11.0 pplowest of 15
EV / EBITDA77.1×27.0×most expensive of 11
Net debt / EBITDA-6.1×0.2×least indebted of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
CXMT 688825.SSChina$411Bn/a+156%13%43.9×n/an/a
ASML ASML.ASNetherlands$550B-6%+23%39%12.2×28.9%+18.5%
Intel INTCUnited States$299B-55%+12%11%5.2×46.1%-7.5%
SK hynix 000660.KSSouth Korea$608B-12%+220%74%3.1×-3.1%+24.9%
Texas Instruments TXNUnited States$253B-4%+20%41%12.5×23.3%+4.1%
Advanced Micro Devices AMDUnited States$733B-1%+42%18%16.0×60.9%+28.8%
Micron Technology MUUnited States$781B-8%+256%75%5.6×7.1%+36.9%
Arm ARMUnited States$204B-18%+25%17%38.9×n/an/a
SamsungElec 005930.KSSouth Korea$886B-14%+88%46%2.0×-7.2%+7.1%
KLA KLACUnited States$180B-26%+16%43%12.5×23.5%+14.4%
Qualcomm QCOMUnited States$177B-24%+2%24%4.2×15.9%+5.1%
Analog Devices ADIUnited States$176B-13%+34%36%13.2×27.8%+14.5%
Mediatek 2454.TWTaiwan$164B+7%+6%15%8.7×40.7%+13.1%
Marvell Technology MRVLUnited States$124B-17%+31%17%13.3×54.4%+22.5%
Broadcom AVGOUnited States$1.40T-32%+49%49%16.1×26.6%+21.7%

Questions

Who are CXMT's main competitors?
Named competitors: Samsung Electronics (005930.KS), SK hynix (000660.KS), Micron Technology (MU). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes ASML (ASML.AS), Intel (INTC), SK hynix (000660.KS), Texas Instruments (TXN), Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), Micron Technology (MU).
Is CXMT expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 43.9× against a peer median of 12.3×, most expensive of 15 in its peer set.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.