Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 3308.HK Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd. Class HOpen in the cockpit ↗

Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd. Class H3308.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Information Technology›Semiconductors

Chinese maker of optical transceivers that connect servers and switches inside AI and cloud data centers.

≈ China's Coherent/Lumentum for optical networking
Mkt cap
$80.7B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
95%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$228M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
16.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+35.0 pp
WACC 20.0%
Hurdle
-12 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
171 days
26 Apr 2027
Close · HKDHK$569.50
1D-8.7%
1W-15.8%
1M-46.8%
3M-48.7%
6Mn/a
YTDn/a
1Yn/a
ATR %12.6%
52w lowhigh56.9% off high

What Zhongji Innolight does

Chinese maker of optical transceivers that connect servers and switches inside AI and cloud data centers.

Sells optical modules, the plug-in parts that carry data between servers and switches, in large volumes to a small number of cloud and networking customers that qualify suppliers over many months. Sales follow cloud companies' AI spending. These Hong Kong shares and the Shenzhen ones are the same company.

In one line: China's Coherent/Lumentum for optical networking.

Products and services

  • 800G/1.6T optical transceivers
  • 400G and lower-speed transceivers
  • Optical components/modules

Customers

  • Global hyperscalers and networking-equipment maker

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Semiconductors/components
  • Optical networking
  • Optical transceiver design and…

What could go right

  • AI data-center buildout driving optical bandwidth demand

What could go wrong

  • Customer/hyperscaler concentration
  • US export-control risk on advanced optics

Moat: narrow (scale, process know-how, customer qualification). Early, high-volume qualification on leading-edge transceiver speeds with major cloud/AI customers.

Headquarters: Zhuhai, China · Founded: 2008 · Employees: 11,625

Named competitors

Zhongji Innolight at a glance

Size Zhongji Innolight (3308.HK) is a Hong Kong Information Technology company (Semiconductors) with a market value of $80.7B, the 24th largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$569.50 on 6 Nov 2026.

Growth Revenue grew 176.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +22.4%); the operating margin is 40.6% (peer median 21.1%).

Valuation It trades at 16.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 23.6× (7th cheapest of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 28% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +39%, so the hurdle is -12 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 35.0 points above its cost of capital (20.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 26 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Zhongji Innolight financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$94.5BHK$41.4BHK$25.9BHK$11.8BHK$11.2B
Revenue growth—+60%+119%+6%—
Gross profitHK$44.3BHK$17.1BHK$8.45BHK$3.60BHK$3.01B
EBITDAn/aHK$15.5BHK$7.07BHK$2.88BHK$2.00B
Net incomeHK$29.6BHK$11.7BHK$5.61BHK$2.40BHK$1.42B
Free cash flowHK$3.50BHK$8.91BHK$346MHK$259MHK$1.96B
Capital expenditureHK$11.9BHK$2.99BHK$3.11BHK$1.88BHK$921M
Total debtHK$2.97BHK$2.36BHK$3.48BHK$1.48BHK$2.47B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Zhongji Innolight competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+100%+200%0×20×40×60×0981688256285A3711IFXNXPITELMPWR009150ADI2408ALABARM3308.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Zhongji Innolight is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%285AIFXNXPITELMPWRMRVL0091502454STMPAADIQCOMKLAC24083308.HKGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Zhongji Innolight is the large dot.

Zhongji Innolight competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (3308.HK vs COHR vs LITE vs 300502.SZ)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Zhongji Innolight 3308.HK$80.7Bn/a+177%41%16.7×27.6%
Coherent COHR$38.0B-42%+23%14%16.6×n/a
Lumentum LITE$48.9B-40%+103%23%18.8×41.7%
Eoptolink Technology 300502.SZ$36.0B-54%+101%44%12.3×21.7%
Accelink Technologies 002281.SZ$10.8B-37%+32%11%42.6×n/a

How Zhongji Innolight compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Zhongji Innolight against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure3308.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-46.8%-27.1%2nd lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-56.9%-49.4%5th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+176.7%+22.4%3rd highest of 21
Operating margin40.6%21.1%4th highest of 21
Forward P/E16.7×23.6×7th cheapest of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)27.6%25.6%8th least demanding of 15
Growth delivered (Del g)+39.3%+9.6%highest of 15
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-11.7 pp+11.7 pp2nd least demanding of 15
ROIC minus cost of capital+35.0 pp+1.4 pp3rd highest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Zhongji Innolight 3308.HKHong Kong$80.7Bn/a+177%41%16.7×27.6%+39.3%
SMIC 0981.HKHong Kong$76.7B-41%+20%9%32.9×n/an/a
Cambricon Technologies 688256.SSChina$75.7B-30%+104%33%87.3×n/an/a
Kioxia 285A.TJapan$88.9B+139%+265%70%2.5×-3.0%+18.8%
Ase Technology 3711.TWTaiwan$70.4B+2%+25%11%17.3×n/an/a
Infineon Technologies IFX.DEGermany$66.8B-33%+6%13%26.0×30.2%+11.3%
NXP Semiconductors NXPIUnited States$62.6B-15%+15%30%14.1×16.3%+7.3%
TE Connectivity TELUnited States$59.5B+1%+15%22%15.1×8.2%+5.9%
Monolithic Power Systems MPWRUnited States$58.1B-26%+40%30%28.3×39.6%+27.0%
Marvell Technology MRVLUnited States$124B-17%+31%17%25.0×54.4%+22.5%
SamsungElecMech 009150.KSSouth Korea$47.2B+5%+22%12%38.7×42.8%+7.9%
Mediatek 2454.TWTaiwan$164B+7%+6%15%24.7×40.7%+13.1%
Coherent COHRUnited States$38.0B-42%+23%14%16.6×n/an/a
STMicroelectronics STMPA.PAFrance$37.7B-32%+10%7%31.4×34.0%+3.1%
Analog Devices ADIUnited States$176B-13%+34%36%22.4×27.8%+14.5%
Qualcomm QCOMUnited States$177B-24%+2%24%17.0×15.9%+5.1%
KLA KLACUnited States$180B-26%+16%43%22.3×23.5%+14.4%
Nanya Technology 2408.TWTaiwan$35.8B+34%+586%71%2.9×0.6%+1.8%
United Micro Electronics 2303.TWTaiwan$34.9B+11%+13%21%13.7×14.2%+6.1%
Astera Labs ALABUnited States$33.1B-5%+115%26%28.0×n/an/a
Arm ARMUnited States$204B-18%+25%17%67.7×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Zhongji Innolight's main competitors?
Named competitors: Coherent (COHR), Lumentum (LITE), Eoptolink Technology (300502.SZ), Accelink Technologies (002281.SZ). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes SMIC (0981.HK), Cambricon Technologies (688256.SS), Kioxia (285A.T), Ase Technology (3711.TW), Infineon Technologies (IFX.DE), NXP Semiconductors (NXPI).
Is Zhongji Innolight expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 16.7× against a peer median of 23.6×, 7th cheapest of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 28% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +39%, so the hurdle is -12 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.