Loading…

LumentumLITECompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Information Technology›Electrical Products

US maker of optical components and lasers for telecom/data-center networks and industrial/consumer laser applications.

Momentum laggard 7
Mkt cap
$48.9B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
98%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$5.08B
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
18.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+4.4 pp
WACC 12.9%
Hurdle
+30 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
97 days
11 Feb 2027
Close · USD$538.59
1D+5.7%
1W-35.9%
1M-48.6%
3M-33.8%
6M-40.4%
YTD+46.1%
1Y+131.4%
ATR %14.6%
Beta2.98
52w lowhigh52.9% off high

What Lumentum does

US maker of optical components and lasers for telecom/data-center networks and industrial/consumer laser applications.

Sells lasers and optical parts on a design-in basis: a customer qualifies a part for a product, then buys it for years. The mix has shifted from telecom carriers and Apple's phone-sensing lasers toward cloud data centers, whose transceiver makers use its lasers. It was spun out of JDSU in 2015 and grew by buying Oclaro in 2018.

Products and services

  • Optical transceivers/components (datacom)
  • Telecom optical components
  • 3D sensing lasers (consumer)
  • Industrial lasers

Customers

  • Hyperscalers/networking-equipment makers
  • Telecom carriers
  • Consumer electronics OEMs (3D sensing)

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Semiconductors/components
  • Optical and photonics components
  • Optical transceiver/laser component…

What could go right

  • AI data-center optical-bandwidth demand

What could go wrong

  • Customer/hyperscaler concentration
  • Historically volatile telecom-optical cycles

Moat: narrow (process know-how, customer qualification, IP / patents). Deep photonics manufacturing know-how and long customer qualification cycles, in a competitive, cyclical optical-components market.

Headquarters: San Jose, California, US · Founded: 2015 · Employees: 13,757

Named competitors

Lumentum at a glance

Size Lumentum (LITE) is a United States Information Technology company (Electrical Products) with a market value of $48.9B, the 259th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $538.59 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 40.4%, against -32.9% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 9 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 103.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +51.7%); the operating margin is 23.4% (peer median 12.2%).

Valuation It trades at 18.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.8× (3rd most expensive of 6).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 42% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +12%, so the hurdle is +30 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.4 points above its cost of capital (12.9% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 8.5% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 11 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 67LITE 51
Six months, rebased to 100: Lumentum against the median of its 9 peers (local-currency closes).

Lumentum financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2026-06-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023
Revenue$3.74B$3.01B$1.65B$1.36B$1.77B
Revenue growth—+83%+21%-23%—
Gross profit$1.66B$1.20B$392M$196M$560M
EBITDA$1.16B$810M$75.6M-$79.4M$210M
Net income-$6.58B-$6.94B$25.9M-$546M-$132M
Free cash flow$356M$300M-$105M-$108M$51.3M
Capital expenditure$605M$451M$231M$137M$128M
Total debt$1.43B$1.67B$2.61B$2.56B$2.87B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Lumentum competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%-40%-20%0%23836869BDCENPH0968SEDGPOETTELITE6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Lumentum is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%20×40×60×23836869BDCENPH0968LITERevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Lumentum is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%6869BDCENPH0968SEDGLITEGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Lumentum is the large dot.

Lumentum competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (LITE vs COHR vs 3308.HK vs 300502.SZ)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Lumentum LITE$48.9B-40%+103%23%18.8×41.7%
Coherent COHR$38.0B-42%+23%14%16.6×n/a
Zhongji Innolight 3308.HK$80.7Bn/a+177%41%16.7×27.6%
Eoptolink Technology 300502.SZ$36.0B-54%+101%44%12.3×21.7%
Ciena CIEN$34.5B-56%+33%14%23.4×29.0%

How Lumentum compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Lumentum against its 9 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureLITEPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-48.6%-28.0%2nd lowest of 10
6-month return-40.4%-32.9%4th lowest of 9
Distance from 52-week high-52.9%-64.3%4th highest of 10
Revenue growth (TTM)+103.2%+51.7%3rd highest of 9
Operating margin23.4%12.2%3rd highest of 9
Forward P/E18.8×15.8×3rd most expensive of 6
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)41.7%10.3%most demanding of 6
Growth delivered (Del g)+11.6%+10.8%3rd highest of 6
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+30.1 pp+2.5 ppmost demanding of 6
ROIC minus cost of capital+4.4 pp-3.6 pp3rd highest of 10
EV / EBITDA41.8×13.4×most expensive of 5
Net debt / EBITDA-0.5×1.0×2nd least indebted of 5

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Lumentum LITEUnited States$48.9B-40%+103%23%18.8×41.7%+11.6%
Elite Material 2383.TWTaiwan$41.4B-19%+89%26%15.8×n/an/a
Yangtze Optical Fibre and Cable Joint Stock 6869.HKHong Kong$17.6B-63%+77%34%7.4×-8.4%+10.8%
Belden BDCUnited States$3.83B-13%+18%12%10.2×10.3%+7.8%
Enphase Energy ENPHUnited States$3.77B-22%-20%13%27.0×18.7%+13.7%
Xinyi Solar 0968.HKHong Kong$2.48B-32%-25%13%62.7×0.7%+12.9%
SolarEdge Technologies SEDGUnited States$1.69B-33%+26%-6%n/a11.4%-4.1%
POET Technologies POETUnited States$877M-54%+266%-3,625%n/an/an/a
TE TEUnited States$707M-62%+427%-17%n/an/an/a
General Fusion GFUZUnited States$332Mn/an/an/an/an/an/a

Questions

Who are Lumentum's main competitors?
Named competitors: Coherent (COHR), Zhongji Innolight (3308.HK), Eoptolink Technology (300502.SZ), Ciena (CIEN). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Elite Material (2383.TW), Yangtze Optical Fibre and Cable Joint Stock (6869.HK), Belden (BDC), Enphase Energy (ENPH), Xinyi Solar (0968.HK), SolarEdge Technologies (SEDG).
Is Lumentum expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 18.8× against a peer median of 15.8×, 3rd most expensive of 6 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 42% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +12%, so the hurdle is +30 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Lumentum stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -40.4% against -32.9% for the median peer; over one year +131.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.