Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 002281.SZ Accelink Technologies Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Accelink Technologies Co., Ltd. Class A002281.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Electronic Components

Chinese maker of optical transceivers and components used in telecom networks and data-center interconnects.

≈ China's answer to Lumentum/Coherent in optical componentsMomentum laggard 1
Mkt cap
$10.8B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$533M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
42.6×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-1.3 pp
WACC 12.5%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
174 days
29 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥91.30
1D-6.2%
1W-11.0%
1M-39.9%
3M-41.7%
6M-36.7%
YTD+30.5%
1Y+49.3%
ATR %10.4%
52w lowhigh67.3% off high

What Accelink Technologies does

Chinese maker of optical transceivers and components used in telecom networks and data-center interconnects.

Sells optical modules and components in volume to telecom equipment makers and carriers, with growth shifting from long-running telecom orders toward data-center orders where speeds step up every couple of years, so a product has a short window to earn. It is state-controlled.

In one line: China's answer to Lumentum/Coherent in optical components.

Products and services

  • Optical transceiver modules
  • Laser chips
  • Passive optical components
  • Data-center interconnect optics

Customers

  • Telecom equipment makers
  • Data-center/hyperscale operators (indirect via mod

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Semiconductors & optical components
  • Optical communications
  • Optical transceivers, laser chips…

What could go right

  • AI data-center optical-interconnect demand
  • 5G network build-out

What could go wrong

  • Rapid product-cycle/pricing pressure in optics
  • Customer concentration in telecom/datacom

Moat: narrow (process know-how, IP / patents, customer qualification). Optical-component manufacturing know-how and telecom-carrier qualification, in a competitive global optics supply chain.

Headquarters: Wuhan, China · Employees: 4,945

Named competitors

Accelink Technologies at a glance

Size Accelink Technologies (002281.SZ) is a China Information Technology company (Electronic Components) with a market value of $10.8B, the 228th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥91.30 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 36.7%, against -19.0% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 7th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 32.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +33.7%); the operating margin is 10.7% (peer median 15.5%).

Valuation It trades at 42.6× forward earnings against a peer median of 22.4× (5th most expensive of 20).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.3 points below its cost of capital (12.5% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 29 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 81002281.SZ 61
Six months, rebased to 100: Accelink Technologies against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Accelink Technologies financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥15.1BCN¥11.9BCN¥8.27BCN¥6.05BCN¥6.90B
Revenue growth—+44%+37%-12%—
Gross profitCN¥4.02BCN¥2.61BCN¥1.69BCN¥1.20BCN¥1.45B
EBITDAn/aCN¥1.37BCN¥872MCN¥729MCN¥801M
Net incomeCN¥1.51BCN¥946MCN¥661MCN¥619MCN¥608M
Free cash flow-CN¥2.73BCN¥826M-CN¥1.31BCN¥380MCN¥211M
Capital expenditureCN¥1.42BCN¥825MCN¥707MCN¥670MCN¥428M
Total debtCN¥2.76BCN¥2.78BCN¥2.30BCN¥1.61BCN¥2.02B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Accelink Technologies competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%-40%-20%0%3189495823682382348124766032286274688183002938TTMI8046NVTVICR68832260345930083044300620002281.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Accelink Technologies is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+25%+50%+75%0×100×200×3189495823682382348124766032286274688183002938TTMI6883223044002436300620002281.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Accelink Technologies is the large dot.

Accelink Technologies competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (002281.SZ vs LITE vs COHR vs 300308.SZ)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Accelink Technologies 002281.SZ$10.8B-37%+32%11%42.6×n/a
Lumentum LITE$48.9B-40%+103%23%18.8×41.7%
Coherent COHR$38.0B-42%+23%14%16.6×n/a
Zhongji Innolight 300308.SZ$79.4B-48%+162%41%15.4×23.2%

How Accelink Technologies compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Accelink Technologies against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure002281.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-39.9%-35.9%9th lowest of 21
6-month return-36.7%-19.0%7th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-67.3%-50.9%3rd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+32.0%+33.7%9th lowest of 21
Operating margin10.7%15.5%7th lowest of 21
Forward P/E42.6×22.4×5th most expensive of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital-1.3 pp+2.9 pp9th lowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Accelink Technologies 002281.SZChina$10.8B-37%+32%11%42.6×n/an/a
Kinsus Interconnect Technology 3189.TWTaiwan$10.7B+27%+34%14%29.4×41.2%+7.7%
Zhen Ding Technology Holding Lt 4958.TWTaiwan$12.8B-12%+5%9%18.4×n/an/a
Gold Circuit Electronics 2368.TWTaiwan$12.9B-45%+68%26%14.5×14.2%+20.7%
Sunny Optical 2382.HKHong Kong$8.92B-3%+20%8%14.8×4.9%+1.9%
Innolux 3481.TWTaiwan$8.71B+32%+11%0%62.6×37.3%-3.4%
Victory Giant Technology (HuiZhou) 2476.HKHong Kong$13.6B-67%+45%26%12.4×n/an/a
Shenzhen Kinwong Electronic 603228.SSChina$8.38B-23%+33%12%22.6×n/an/a
Taiwan Union Technology 6274.TWOTaiwan$8.21B-26%+87%23%13.9×n/an/a
Shengyi Electronics 688183.SSChina$7.95B-44%+46%21%19.4×n/an/a
Avary Holding (Shenzhen) 002938.SZChina$16.2B-35%+8%10%22.4×n/an/a
TTM Technologies TTMIUnited States$7.01B-58%+38%12%8.5×24.1%+6.7%
Nan Ya Printed Circuit Board 8046.TWTaiwan$17.1B-12%+34%12%26.1×58.7%+0.8%
NVT NVTUnited States$17.2B-38%+48%18%16.4×16.2%+14.3%
VICR VICRUnited States$6.78B-43%+41%25%25.9×46.0%+6.6%
Orbbec 688322.SSChina$6.73B+37%+1%0%202.4×n/an/a
Jiangxi Redboard Technology 603459.SSChina$6.70B-4%+36%17%n/a53.4%+36.1%
Largan Precision 3008.TWTaiwan$17.7B+76%0%35%26.0×12.6%+1.8%
Tripod Technology 3044.TWTaiwan$6.57B-15%+21%19%10.7×n/an/a
Shenzhen Fastprint Circuit Tech 002436.SZChina$6.54B-7%+26%6%57.3×n/an/a
Advanced Fiber Resources Zhuhai 300620.SZChina$6.50B-27%+86%18%107.0×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Accelink Technologies's main competitors?
Named competitors: Lumentum Holdings (LITE), Coherent (COHR), InnoLight Technology (300308.SZ). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Kinsus Interconnect Technology (3189.TW), Zhen Ding Technology Holding Lt (4958.TW), Gold Circuit Electronics (2368.TW), Sunny Optical (2382.HK), Innolux (3481.TW), Victory Giant Technology (HuiZhou) (2476.HK).
Is Accelink Technologies expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 42.6× against a peer median of 22.4×, 5th most expensive of 20 in its peer set.
How has Accelink Technologies stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -36.7% against -19.0% for the median peer; over one year +49.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.