Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › ALAB Astera Labs, Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

Astera Labs, Inc.ALABCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Information Technology›Semiconductors

Fabless chipmaker of high-speed connectivity semiconductors (PCIe, CXL) that link CPUs, GPUs and memory inside AI data centers.

Momentum laggard 11
Mkt cap
$33.1B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
82%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$1.21B
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
28.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+27.2 pp
WACC 19.8%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
102 days
16 Feb 2027
Close · USD$190.71
1D+6.3%
1W-26.3%
1M-45.0%
3M-39.9%
6M-4.5%
YTD+14.6%
1Y+4.8%
ATR %13.0%
Beta3.88
52w lowhigh61.8% off high

What Astera Labs does

Fabless chipmaker of high-speed connectivity semiconductors (PCIe, CXL) that link CPUs, GPUs and memory inside AI data centers.

Sells chips, and cables with its chips built in, that are designed into AI server boards and racks; once a design wins a place in a platform, orders follow server shipments. It does not manufacture its own chips, relying on outside foundries. Software tools that let operators monitor connections add stickiness. It listed in 2024.

Products and services

  • PCIe retimers/smart cable modules
  • CXL memory-connectivity chips
  • COSMOS software management platform

Customers

  • Hyperscale cloud providers and AI server/GPU syste

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Semiconductors
  • Data-center connectivity
  • Connectivity/interconnect chips

What could go right

  • AI data-center build-out and GPU attach-rate growth
  • Design wins with hyperscalers

What could go wrong

  • Customer/hyperscaler concentration
  • AI capex cycle slowdown risk

Moat: narrow (process know-how, customer qualification, IP / patents). Early, qualified position in PCIe/CXL connectivity for AI servers, though it depends heavily on Nvidia-centric AI capex cycles.

Headquarters: Santa Clara, California, United States · Founded: 2017 · Employees: 756

Named competitors

Astera Labs at a glance

Size Astera Labs (ALAB) is a United States Information Technology company (Semiconductors) with a market value of $33.1B, the 337th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $190.71 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 4.5%, against -22.9% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 7th highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 115.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +22.5%); the operating margin is 25.5% (peer median 16.2%).

Valuation It trades at 28.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 24.0× (10th cheapest of 19).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 27.2 points above its cost of capital (19.8% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 4.6% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 16 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015020011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026ALAB 92Peer median 75
Six months, rebased to 100: Astera Labs against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Astera Labs financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$1.56B$853M$396M$116M$79.9M
Revenue growth—+115%+242%+45%—
Gross profit$1.15B$645M$303M$79.8M$58.7M
EBITDA$413M$180M-$113M-$27.7M-$59.4M
Net income$461M$219M-$83.4M-$26.3M-$58.3M
Free cash flow$345M$282M$102M-$15.5M-$39.8M
Capital expenditure$92.1M$37.5M$34.2M$2.76M$3.87M
Total debt$45.0M$31.0M$3.07M$2.93M$1.96M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Astera Labs competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%-40%-20%0%MCHP23032408688802STMPACOHR67236883476880086039863443688795ON009150688072FSLRGFS300394ALAB6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Astera Labs is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+200%+400%+600%0×200×400×MCHP230324086888026883476880086039863443688820ALABRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Astera Labs is the large dot.

Astera Labs competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (ALAB vs MRVL vs AVGO vs CRDO)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Astera Labs ALAB$33.1B-5%+115%26%28.0×n/a
Marvell Technology MRVL$124B-17%+31%17%25.0×54.4%
Broadcom AVGO$1.40T-32%+49%49%16.9×26.6%
Credo Technology CRDO$22.7B-36%+165%32%16.5×47.4%

How Astera Labs compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Astera Labs against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureALABPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-45.0%-22.7%3rd lowest of 21
6-month return-4.5%-22.9%7th highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-61.8%-53.1%6th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+115.2%+22.5%4th highest of 20
Operating margin25.5%16.2%6th highest of 18
Forward P/E28.0×24.0×10th cheapest of 19
ROIC minus cost of capital+27.2 pp-1.6 pp5th highest of 18
EV / EBITDA76.9×12.5×most expensive of 10
Net debt / EBITDA-3.2×-0.4×least indebted of 11

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Astera Labs ALABUnited States$33.1B-5%+115%26%28.0×n/an/a
Microchip Technology MCHPUnited States$31.7B-41%+21%16%14.5×34.2%-2.8%
United Micro Electronics 2303.TWTaiwan$34.9B+11%+13%21%13.7×14.2%+6.1%
Nanya Technology 2408.TWTaiwan$35.8B+34%+586%71%2.9×0.6%+1.8%
MetaX Integrated Circuits (Shanghai) 688802.SSChina$29.5B-35%+84%n/a469.5×n/an/a
STMicroelectronics STMPA.PAFrance$37.7B-32%+10%7%31.4×34.0%+3.1%
Coherent COHRUnited States$38.0B-42%+23%14%16.6×n/an/a
Renesas Electronics 6723.TJapan$27.9B-23%+26%24%9.9×12.2%+13.0%
Hua Hong Grace Semiconductor 688347.SSChina$25.5B+23%+18%-2%234.7×n/an/a
Montage Technology 688008.SSChina$25.5B-13%+33%42%43.7×39.7%+24.5%
Giga Device Semiconductor 603986.SSChina$25.3B-23%+166%50%10.9×16.5%+15.4%
Global Unichip 3443.TWTaiwan$25.1B+29%+104%13%50.1×n/an/a
Moore Threads Technology 688795.SSChina$25.1B-53%+226%-9%n/an/an/a
ON Semiconductor ONUnited States$24.6B-39%+3%19%14.3×20.0%+2.7%
Shanghai Enflame Technology 688801.SSChina$23.8Bn/an/an/an/an/an/a
SamsungElecMech 009150.KSSouth Korea$47.2B+5%+22%12%38.7×42.8%+7.9%
SJ Semiconductor 688820.SSChina$22.9B-21%+1%n/a136.4×n/an/a
Piotech 688072.SSChina$21.7B+23%+24%14%55.5×43.5%+71.7%
First Solar FSLRUnited States$21.6B-9%-1%39%9.2×12.4%+14.0%
GlobalFoundries GFSUnited States$21.2B-48%+1%12%16.2×24.9%+7.0%
Suzhou TFC Optical Communication 300394.SZChina$19.9B-44%+26%51%36.3×44.8%+42.7%

Questions

Who are Astera Labs's main competitors?
Named competitors: Marvell Technology (MRVL), Broadcom (AVGO), Credo Technology Group (CRDO). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Microchip Technology (MCHP), United Micro Electronics (2303.TW), Nanya Technology (2408.TW), MetaX Integrated Circuits (Shanghai) (688802.SS), STMicroelectronics (STMPA.PA), Coherent (COHR).
Is Astera Labs expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 28.0× against a peer median of 24.0×, 10th cheapest of 19 in its peer set.
How has Astera Labs stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -4.5% against -22.9% for the median peer; over one year +4.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.