Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 5938.T LIXIL CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

LIXIL Corporation5938.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Consumer Discretionary›Home Furnishings

Major Japanese maker of housing equipment — toilets, faucets, windows and kitchens — under brands including INAX and American Standard.

≈ Japan's Kohler/Masco combinedMomentum strong 61
Mkt cap
$3.07B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
94%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$26.6M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
38.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-3.5 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
+15 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
85 days
30 Jan 2027
Close · JPY¥1,684
1D-4.6%
1W+2.7%
1M+1.2%
3M-2.1%
6M+4.0%
YTD-11.1%
1Y-7.3%
ATR %2.1%
52w lowhigh13.4% off high

What LIXIL does

Major Japanese maker of housing equipment — toilets, faucets, windows and kitchens — under brands including INAX and American Standard.

Formed in 2011 by merging five Japanese housing-equipment makers, it sells through builders, renovation contractors and dealers in Japan, with renovation, as old fixtures wear out, a steady source of orders. Grohe and American Standard carry its overseas bathroom and faucet sales.

In one line: Japan's Kohler/Masco combined.

Products and services

  • Bath/toilet fixtures (INAX)
  • Windows/aluminum sash
  • Kitchens
  • Water treatment/filtration

Customers

  • Homebuilders/contractors
  • Retail home-improvement consumers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Building materials
  • Housing equipment manufacturing
  • Sanitaryware, windows, kitchens

What could go right

  • Housing renovation demand
  • Overseas brand (Grohe/American Standard) growth

What could go wrong

  • Domestic new-housing starts decline
  • Raw material (metal/resin) cost volatility

Moat: narrow (brand, scale, distribution). Leading domestic housing-equipment brand and manufacturing scale plus overseas Grohe/American Standard brands.

Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan · Founded: 2011 · Employees: 48,073

Named competitors

LIXIL at a glance

Size LIXIL (5938.T) is a Japan Consumer Discretionary company (Home Furnishings) with a market value of $3.07B, the 360th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥1,684 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 4.0%, against -12.6% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 5th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 2.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +0.4%); the operating margin is 1.8% (peer median 6.5%).

Valuation It trades at 38.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.8× (3rd most expensive of 16).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 17% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +2%, so the hurdle is +15 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.5 points below its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 30 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20265938.T 101Peer median 87
Six months, rebased to 100: LIXIL against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

LIXIL financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥1.54T¥1.51T¥1.50T¥1.48T¥1.50T
Revenue growth—0%+1%-1%—
Gross profit¥513B¥469B¥454B¥431B¥427B
EBITDA¥111B¥122B¥115B¥104B¥108B
Net income¥199M¥8.14B¥2.00B-¥13.8B¥17.2B
Free cash flow¥9.62B¥50.5B¥65.6B¥10.1B-¥26.6B
Capital expenditure¥47.8B¥42.8B¥45.2B¥52.9B¥55.3B
Total debt¥690B¥647B¥658B¥677B¥618B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

LIXIL competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-10%0%+10%+20%8464603833ASAHIINDIA603816PATK300093601636001221ARHS301061603389603773FORN005440MBC301376LZB19990000125938.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. LIXIL is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%0×100×200×8464603833ASAHIINDIA603816001221ARHS30106160377330137619995938.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. LIXIL is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%+30%0%20%8464603833603816PATK001221ARHS301061FORN005440MBC7994301376LZB19995938.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. LIXIL is the large dot.

LIXIL competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (5938.T vs 5332.T vs MAS vs 7981.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
LIXIL 5938.T$3.07B+4%+2%2%38.8×17.3%
Toto 5332.T$5.40B-1%+5%8%18.2×7.8%
Masco MAS$15.8B+15%+1%18%18.0×4.9%
Takara standard 7981.T$1.20B+2%+2%7%n/a-5.5%
Sanwa 5929.T$5.10B+8%+2%11%14.8×-2.6%
Fortune Brands Innovations FBIN$5.74B+27%-3%14%19.7×5.3%
Geberit GEBN.SW$22.1B+14%+3%29%29.8×6.6%

How LIXIL compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

LIXIL against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure5938.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+1.2%-0.1%10th highest of 21
6-month return+4.0%-12.6%5th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-13.4%-34.0%5th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+2.4%+0.4%8th highest of 21
Operating margin1.8%6.5%7th lowest of 21
Forward P/E38.8×16.8×3rd most expensive of 16
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)17.3%-1.6%3rd most demanding of 15
Growth delivered (Del g)+1.9%+7.9%3rd lowest of 15
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+15.5 pp-9.1 pp2nd most demanding of 15
ROIC minus cost of capital-3.5 pp-1.3 pp9th lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA9.6×9.0×5th most expensive of 10
Net debt / EBITDA5.2×1.0×3rd most indebted of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
LIXIL 5938.TJapan$3.07B+4%+2%2%38.8×17.3%+1.9%
Nien Made Enterprise 8464.TWTaiwan$3.08B+1%+4%35%13.3×-8.3%+4.2%
Oppein Home 603833.SSChina$2.88B-32%-27%5%16.8×6.1%+3.2%
Asahi India Glass ASAHIINDIA.NSIndia$2.79B+22%+20%16%58.8×n/an/a
Jason Furniture (Hangzhou) 603816.SSChina$3.57B-10%+1%9%13.3×-2.2%+9.7%
Patrick Industries PATKUnited States$2.53B-17%+2%6%16.8×9.3%+9.7%
Gansu Golden Solar 300093.SZChina$2.42B-9%-9%-152%n/an/an/a
Zhuzhou Kibing 601636.SSChina$2.22B-21%-4%-8%n/an/an/a
Higold 001221.SZChina$2.05B-40%+17%21%17.4×-3.4%+33.2%
Arhaus ARHSUnited States$2.01B+118%+5%7%26.2×28.4%+22.1%
MotoMotion China 301061.SZChina$1.96B-4%-2%26%18.5×-5.1%+20.7%
A-Zenith Home Furnishings 603389.SSChina$1.91B-17%+275%-5%n/an/an/a
WG Tech (JiangXi) 603773.SSChina$1.87B-20%+2%-8%222.4×n/an/a
Forbo FORN.SWSwitzerland$1.51B+23%-1%8%16.7×0.2%-0.6%
Hyundai G.f 005440.KSSouth Korea$1.44B-21%-1%4%4.8×-1.0%+20.1%
MasterBrand MBCUnited States$1.37B-12%0%-1%n/a19.4%+2.1%
Okamura 7994.TJapan$1.35B-14%+3%7%9.5×-6.7%+6.1%
Ziel Home Furnishing Technology 301376.SZChina$1.32B+32%+21%6%18.2×-7.0%+17.0%
La-Z-Boy LZBUnited States$1.27B-11%0%7%12.7×4.2%+4.2%
Man Wah 1999.HKHong Kong$1.20B-45%-3%14%7.9×-6.5%0.0%
CSG 000012.SZChina$1.17B-13%-12%-5%n/an/an/a

Questions

Who are LIXIL's main competitors?
Named competitors: TOTO (5332.T), Masco (MAS), Takara Standard (7981.T), Sanwa Holdings (5929.T), Fortune Brands Innovations (FBIN), Geberit (GEBN.SW). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Nien Made Enterprise (8464.TW), Oppein Home (603833.SS), Asahi India Glass (ASAHIINDIA.NS), Jason Furniture (Hangzhou) (603816.SS), Patrick Industries (PATK), Gansu Golden Solar (300093.SZ).
Is LIXIL expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 38.8× against a peer median of 16.8×, 3rd most expensive of 16 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 17% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +2%, so the hurdle is +15 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has LIXIL stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +4.0% against -12.6% for the median peer; over one year -7.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.