Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 005440.KS Hyundai G.f. Holdings Co. Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Hyundai G.f. Holdings Co. Ltd.005440.KSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

South Korea · KRW·Consumer Discretionary›Home Furnishings

Holding company within Hyundai Department Store Group, overseeing foodservice/food distribution and furniture maker Hyundai Livart.

Momentum strong 69
Mkt cap
$1.44B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
34%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$2.31M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
4.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-3.6 pp
WACC 6.3%
Hurdle
-21 pp
Req g minus delivered
Close · KRW₩11,330
1D-1.3%
1W+3.7%
1M-7.7%
3M-5.6%
6M-21.1%
YTD+36.2%
1Y+40.2%
ATR %4.9%
52w lowhigh42.8% off high

What Hyundai G.f does

Holding company within Hyundai Department Store Group, overseeing foodservice/food distribution and furniture maker Hyundai Livart.

Products and services

  • Institutional foodservice
  • Food distribution/import
  • Hyundai Livart furniture stake

Customers

  • Corporate/institutional cafeterias
  • Furniture retail customers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer holding company
  • Foodservice and food distribution
  • Furniture (Hyundai Livart)

What could go right

  • Institutional foodservice contract growth
  • Furniture/home-renovation demand

What could go wrong

  • Food-cost inflation
  • Housing-market-linked furniture demand

Moat: narrow (scale, brand). Established foodservice contracts and a leading domestic furniture brand under one group.

Headquarters: Seoul, South Korea · Employees: 94

Named competitors

  • CJ Freshway private or unlisted
  • Hanssem 009240.KS

Hyundai G.f at a glance

Size Hyundai G.f (005440.KS) is a South Korea Consumer Discretionary company (Home Furnishings) with a market value of $1.44B, the 177th largest of 495 South Korea companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₩11,330 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 21.1%, against -13.7% for the median peer and -24.5% for the South Korea market (cap-weighted) — 6th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 0.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +0.1%); the operating margin is 3.8% (peer median 6.6%).

Valuation It trades at 4.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 18.4× (cheapest of 15).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +20%, so the hurdle is -21 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.6 points below its cost of capital (6.3% WACC).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 86005440.KS 77
Six months, rebased to 100: Hyundai G.f against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Hyundai G.f financials

Reported figures in KRW; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₩8.16T₩8.09T₩7.41T₩2.63T₩1.96T
Revenue growth—+9%+182%+34%—
Gross profit₩2.52T₩2.48T₩1.96T₩365B₩239B
EBITDA₩573B₩534B₩412B₩42.8B₩20.5B
Net income₩352B₩412B₩699B₩1.13T₩58.8B
Free cash flow₩391B₩257B₩267B₩10.8B-₩66.2B
Capital expenditure₩207B₩194B₩123B₩36.3B₩76.7B
Total debt₩1.04T₩942B₩857B₩291B₩243B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Hyundai G.f competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-25%0%+25%+50%-20%0%+20%+40%FORNMBC7994301376LZB1999000012001323002572603773603389002713301061ARHS001221TTKPRESTIGHELE005440.KS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Hyundai G.f is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%-10%0%+10%+20%0×100×200×FORN7994301376LZB1999002572603773ARHS001221TTKPRESTIG005440.KSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Hyundai G.f is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%FORNMBC7994301376LZB1999001323301061ARHS001221TTKPRESTIGHELECELLO005440.KSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Hyundai G.f is the large dot.

Hyundai G.f competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (005440.KS vs 009240.KS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Hyundai G.f 005440.KS$1.44B-21%-1%4%4.8×-1.0%
Hanssem 009240.KS$496M-6%-10%2%44.5×5.4%

How Hyundai G.f compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Hyundai G.f against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure005440.KSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-7.7%-1.4%4th lowest of 21
6-month return-21.1%-13.7%6th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-42.8%-38.1%10th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-0.8%+0.1%10th lowest of 21
Operating margin3.8%6.6%8th lowest of 21
Forward P/E4.8×18.4×cheapest of 15
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-1.0%0.1%7th least demanding of 15
Growth delivered (Del g)+20.1%+5.1%4th highest of 15
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-21.1 pp-1.6 pp4th least demanding of 15
ROIC minus cost of capital-3.6 pp-3.2 pp11th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA6.9×9.0×4th cheapest of 9
Net debt / EBITDA-0.7×0.8×3rd least indebted of 11

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Hyundai G.f 005440.KSSouth Korea$1.44B-21%-1%4%4.8×-1.0%+20.1%
Forbo FORN.SWSwitzerland$1.51B+23%-1%8%16.7×0.2%-0.6%
MasterBrand MBCUnited States$1.37B-12%0%-1%n/a19.4%+2.1%
Okamura 7994.TJapan$1.35B-14%+3%7%9.5×-6.7%+6.1%
Ziel Home Furnishing Technology 301376.SZChina$1.32B+32%+21%6%18.2×-7.0%+17.0%
La-Z-Boy LZBUnited States$1.27B-11%0%7%12.7×4.2%+4.2%
Man Wah 1999.HKHong Kong$1.20B-45%-3%14%7.9×-6.5%0.0%
CSG 000012.SZChina$1.17B-13%-12%-5%n/an/an/a
De Rucci Healthy Sleep 001323.SZChina$1.15B-26%-6%5%19.5×0.0%+3.3%
Suofeiya Home Collection 002572.SZChina$1.12B-35%-22%8%20.7×-2.8%+2.3%
WG Tech (JiangXi) 603773.SSChina$1.87B-20%+2%-8%222.4×n/an/a
A-Zenith Home Furnishings 603389.SSChina$1.91B-17%+275%-5%n/an/an/a
Dong Yi Ri Sheng Home Decoration 002713.SZChina$1.08B-38%-1%-23%n/an/an/a
MotoMotion China 301061.SZChina$1.96B-4%-2%26%18.5×-5.1%+20.7%
Arhaus ARHSUnited States$2.01B+118%+5%7%26.2×28.4%+22.1%
Higold 001221.SZChina$2.05B-40%+17%21%17.4×-3.4%+33.2%
Zhuzhou Kibing 601636.SSChina$2.22B-21%-4%-8%n/an/an/a
TTK Prestige TTKPRESTIG.NSIndia$882M+14%+16%7%33.2×36.8%+6.3%
Helen of Troy HELEUnited States$876M+51%+1%7%9.8×3.9%-3.1%
Cello World CELLO.NSIndia$870M-14%+7%16%21.5×28.6%+17.2%
Gansu Golden Solar 300093.SZChina$2.42B-9%-9%-152%n/an/an/a

Questions

Who are Hyundai G.f's main competitors?
Named competitors: CJ Freshway (private or unlisted), Hanssem (009240.KS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Forbo (FORN.SW), MasterBrand (MBC), Okamura (7994.T), Ziel Home Furnishing Technology (301376.SZ), La-Z-Boy (LZB), Man Wah (1999.HK).
Is Hyundai G.f expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 4.8× against a peer median of 18.4×, cheapest of 15 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +20%, so the hurdle is -21 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Hyundai G.f stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -21.1% against -13.7% for the median peer; over one year +40.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.