Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 001221.SZ Higold Group Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Higold Group Co., Ltd. Class A001221.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Consumer Discretionary›Home Furnishings

Chinese maker and exporter of outdoor and patio furniture -- rattan sofas, dining sets -- sold mainly to US and European retailers.

≈ A Chinese outdoor-furniture exporter supplying big-box/patio retailersMomentum weak 30
Mkt cap
$2.05B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
73%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$13.7M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
17.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+48.1 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-37 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
117 days
3 Mar 2027
Close · CNYCN¥34.23
1D+1.9%
1W+5.9%
1M+5.2%
3M-14.2%
6M-40.0%
YTD-40.9%
1Y-44.1%
ATR %4.1%
52w lowhigh56.2% off high

What Higold does

Chinese maker and exporter of outdoor and patio furniture -- rattan sofas, dining sets -- sold mainly to US and European retailers.

In one line: A Chinese outdoor-furniture exporter supplying big-box/patio retailers.

Products and services

  • Outdoor sofas/seating
  • Patio dining sets
  • Rattan/aluminum furniture

Customers

  • US/European furniture retailers
  • Big-box home & garden chains

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer discretionary
  • Home furnishings
  • Outdoor/patio furniture manufacturing…

What could go right

  • US/Europe outdoor-living furniture demand

What could go wrong

  • US tariff/trade policy risk
  • Freight/input cost volatility

Moat: narrow (scale, customer qualification). Established export manufacturing scale and retailer relationships in outdoor furniture.

Headquarters: Hangzhou, China · Employees: 3,505

Named competitors

Higold at a glance

Size Higold (001221.SZ) is a China Consumer Discretionary company (Home Furnishings) with a market value of $2.05B, the 1232nd largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥34.23 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 40.0%, against -11.4% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 2nd lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 16.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +0.4%); the operating margin is 20.8% (peer median 6.2%).

Valuation It trades at 17.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.8× (7th most expensive of 16).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -3% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +33%, so the hurdle is -37 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 48.1 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 3 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 88001221.SZ 61
Six months, rebased to 100: Higold against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Higold financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥3.91BCN¥3.58BCN¥2.86BCN¥2.21BCN¥1.61B
Revenue growth—+25%+29%+37%—
Gross profitCN¥1.45BCN¥1.28BCN¥996MCN¥730MCN¥487M
EBITDAn/aCN¥893MCN¥646MCN¥438MCN¥258M
Net incomeCN¥721MCN¥704MCN¥531MCN¥333MCN¥206M
Free cash flowCN¥303MCN¥818MCN¥341MCN¥364M-CN¥80.5M
Capital expenditureCN¥593MCN¥224MCN¥333MCN¥234MCN¥346M
Total debtCN¥395MCN¥513MCN¥153MCN¥202MCN¥151M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Higold competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-10%0%+10%+20%ARHS301061603389601636603773300093PATKFORNASAHIINDIA603833005440MBC59388464301376LZB1999603816000012001221.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Higold is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%0×100×200×ARHS301061603773PATKASAHIINDIA603833005440593884643013761999001221.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Higold is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%+30%0%20%ARHS301061PATKFORN603833005440MBC593884647994301376LZB1999603816001221.SZGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Higold is the large dot.

Higold competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (001221.SZ vs 1999.HK)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Higold 001221.SZ$2.05B-40%+17%21%17.4×-3.4%
Man Wah 1999.HK$1.20B-45%-3%14%7.9×-6.5%

How Higold compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Higold against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure001221.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+5.2%-0.1%8th highest of 21
6-month return-40.0%-11.4%2nd lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-56.2%-31.3%2nd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+16.9%+0.4%4th highest of 21
Operating margin20.8%6.2%3rd highest of 21
Forward P/E17.4×16.8×7th most expensive of 16
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-3.4%-0.4%6th least demanding of 15
Growth delivered (Del g)+33.2%+5.2%highest of 15
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-36.5 pp-3.4 ppleast demanding of 15
ROIC minus cost of capital+48.1 pp-2.0 pphighest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Higold 001221.SZChina$2.05B-40%+17%21%17.4×-3.4%+33.2%
Arhaus ARHSUnited States$2.01B+118%+5%7%26.2×28.4%+22.1%
MotoMotion China 301061.SZChina$1.96B-4%-2%26%18.5×-5.1%+20.7%
A-Zenith Home Furnishings 603389.SSChina$1.91B-17%+275%-5%n/an/an/a
Zhuzhou Kibing 601636.SSChina$2.22B-21%-4%-8%n/an/an/a
WG Tech (JiangXi) 603773.SSChina$1.87B-20%+2%-8%222.4×n/an/a
Gansu Golden Solar 300093.SZChina$2.42B-9%-9%-152%n/an/an/a
Patrick Industries PATKUnited States$2.53B-17%+2%6%16.8×9.3%+9.7%
Forbo FORN.SWSwitzerland$1.51B+23%-1%8%16.7×0.2%-0.6%
Asahi India Glass ASAHIINDIA.NSIndia$2.79B+22%+20%16%58.8×n/an/a
Oppein Home 603833.SSChina$2.88B-32%-27%5%16.8×6.1%+3.2%
Hyundai G.f 005440.KSSouth Korea$1.44B-21%-1%4%4.8×-1.0%+20.1%
MasterBrand MBCUnited States$1.37B-12%0%-1%n/a19.4%+2.1%
LIXIL 5938.TJapan$3.07B+4%+2%2%38.8×17.3%+1.9%
Nien Made Enterprise 8464.TWTaiwan$3.08B+1%+4%35%13.3×-8.3%+4.2%
Okamura 7994.TJapan$1.35B-14%+3%7%9.5×-6.7%+6.1%
Ziel Home Furnishing Technology 301376.SZChina$1.32B+32%+21%6%18.2×-7.0%+17.0%
La-Z-Boy LZBUnited States$1.27B-11%0%7%12.7×4.2%+4.2%
Man Wah 1999.HKHong Kong$1.20B-45%-3%14%7.9×-6.5%0.0%
Jason Furniture (Hangzhou) 603816.SSChina$3.57B-10%+1%9%13.3×-2.2%+9.7%
CSG 000012.SZChina$1.17B-13%-12%-5%n/an/an/a

Questions

Who are Higold's main competitors?
Named competitors: Man Wah Holdings (1999.HK), Keter Group (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Arhaus (ARHS), MotoMotion China (301061.SZ), A-Zenith Home Furnishings (603389.SS), Zhuzhou Kibing (601636.SS), WG Tech (JiangXi) (603773.SS), Gansu Golden Solar (300093.SZ).
Is Higold expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 17.4× against a peer median of 16.8×, 7th most expensive of 16 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -3% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +33%, so the hurdle is -37 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Higold stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -40.0% against -11.4% for the median peer; over one year -44.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.