Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 2681.T GEO HOLDINGS CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

GEO HOLDINGS Corporation2681.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Consumer Discretionary›Electronics/Appliance Stores
Momentum weak 30
Mkt cap
$467M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
50%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$3.27M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
9.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+1.7 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-15 pp
Req g minus delivered
Close · JPY¥1,850
1D-6.8%
1W-2.3%
1M-16.2%
3M-10.9%
6M-0.5%
YTD-1.4%
1Y+10.7%
ATR %4.0%
52w lowhigh25.5% off high

What GEO does

Employees: 7,249

GEO at a glance

Size GEO (2681.T) is a Japan Consumer Discretionary company (Electronics/Appliance Stores) with a market value of $467M, the 1113th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥1,850 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 0.5%, against +6.8% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 8th highest of 15 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 16.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +9.6%); the operating margin is 3.1% (peer median 3.4%).

Valuation It trades at 9.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 19.9× (2nd cheapest of 13).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is -15 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.7 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 1072681.T 102
Six months, rebased to 100: GEO against the median of its 16 peers (local-currency closes).

GEO financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥502B¥481B¥428B¥434B¥377B
Revenue growth—+13%-1%+15%—
Gross profit¥197B¥189B¥171B¥160B¥142B
EBITDA¥26.3B¥24.8B¥20.6B¥25.5B¥18.9B
Net income¥9.49B¥8.74B¥4.54B¥10.9B¥5.68B
Free cash flown/a¥6.34B-¥3.11B¥2.15B-¥2.20B
Capital expendituren/a¥15.9B¥13.4B¥9.14B¥7.67B
Total debt¥150B¥148B¥120B¥100B¥81.1B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

GEO competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%-20%0%+20%EMILMOZN81737513AVL0025191280REREFNAC0020242730PUUILODDR2681.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. GEO is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+500%+1,000%+1,500%50×100×EMILMOZN8173AVL002519RERE00202482822681.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. GEO is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%-25%0%25%50%EMILMOZN81737513AVL0025190020248282PUUILODDR2681.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. GEO is the large dot.

GEO competitors and peer comparison

How GEO compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

GEO against its 16 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure2681.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-16.2%-4.4%3rd lowest of 17
6-month return-0.5%+6.8%8th highest of 15
Distance from 52-week high-25.5%-22.2%8th lowest of 17
Revenue growth (TTM)+16.2%+9.6%6th highest of 17
Operating margin3.1%3.4%9th highest of 17
Forward P/E9.9×19.9×2nd cheapest of 13
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-7.5%-1.8%4th least demanding of 13
Growth delivered (Del g)+7.9%+0.3%4th highest of 13
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-15.4 pp-4.4 pp2nd least demanding of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital+1.7 pp+3.3 pp7th lowest of 16
EV / EBITDA5.1×13.7×2nd cheapest of 10
Net debt / EBITDA2.3×1.4×4th most indebted of 14

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
GEO 2681.TJapan$467M0%+16%3%9.9×-7.5%+7.9%
SS Retail SSRETAIL.NSIndia$501Mn/a+47%4%n/an/an/a
QVC QVCGUnited States$377Mn/a-8%2%n/an/an/a
Electronics Mart India EMIL.NSIndia$588M+19%+17%5%24.0×12.0%+17.5%
mobilezone MOZN.SWSwitzerland$659M-12%-37%6%15.1×1.4%-6.1%
Joshin 8173.TJapan$674M+42%+9%2%31.8×-3.7%-0.6%
Kojima 7513.TJapan$675M+15%+5%3%n/a-9.8%0.0%
Aditya Vision AVL.NSIndia$714M-6%+28%7%40.4×33.5%+29.0%
Jiangsu Yinhe Electronics 002519.SZChina$852M-38%+1,594%-9%16.2×56.2%-18.2%
China Qidian Guofeng 1280.HKHong Kong$930M+113%-6%-30%n/an/an/a
ATRenew Inc. Sponsored ADR REREUnited States$944M-7%+35%3%8.5×n/an/a
Fnac Darty FNAC.PAFrance$1.16B-1%+10%2%17.4×-0.6%+6.6%
Suning.com 002024.SZChina$1.48B-19%-34%-10%106.3×-3.0%-28.0%
K's 8282.TJapan$1.64B-4%+5%4%10.0×-11.0%-0.8%
Edion 2730.TJapan$1.64B+17%+4%4%15.1×-8.4%+0.7%
Puuilo PUUILO.HEFinland$1.76B+46%+15%18%22.5×-5.2%+13.1%
Dicker Data DDR.AXAustralia$1.78B+54%+12%6%22.4×9.9%+5.1%

Questions

Which companies are GEO's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: SS Retail (SSRETAIL.NS), QVC (QVCG), Electronics Mart India (EMIL.NS), mobilezone (MOZN.SW), Joshin (8173.T), Kojima (7513.T), Aditya Vision (AVL.NS), Jiangsu Yinhe Electronics (002519.SZ).
Is GEO expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 9.9× against a peer median of 19.9×, 2nd cheapest of 13 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is -15 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has GEO stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -0.5% against +6.8% for the median peer; over one year +10.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.