Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 002195.SZ Shanghai Stonehill Technology Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Shanghai Stonehill Technology Co., Ltd. Class A002195.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Packaged Software

Chinese internet/technology company; specific product line not confidently known from public information.

Momentum weak 24
Mkt cap
$4.77B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
99%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$91.5M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
284.5×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-14.7 pp
WACC 11.5%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · CNYCN¥5.69
1D-2.4%
1W+8.8%
1M-2.6%
3M-17.2%
6M-33.9%
YTD-19.8%
1Y-22.2%
ATR %4.0%
52w lowhigh56.9% off high

What Shanghai Stonehill Technology does

Chinese internet/technology company; specific product line not confidently known from public information.

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Information Technology
  • Software/Internet
  • Segment unclear

Moat: none

Headquarters: China · Employees: 535

Shanghai Stonehill Technology at a glance

Size Shanghai Stonehill Technology (002195.SZ) is a China Information Technology company (Packaged Software) with a market value of $4.77B, the 530th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥5.69 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 33.9%, against +20.2% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 2nd lowest of 19 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 11.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +13.5%); the operating margin is -24.5% (peer median 8.1%).

Valuation It trades at 284.5× forward earnings against a peer median of 22.4× (most expensive of 15).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 14.7 points below its cost of capital (11.5% WACC).

Relative performance

608010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 125002195.SZ 64
Six months, rebased to 100: Shanghai Stonehill Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Shanghai Stonehill Technology financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥717MCN¥650MCN¥660MCN¥563MCN¥664M
Revenue growth—-2%+17%-15%—
Gross profitCN¥216MCN¥125MCN¥189MCN¥285MCN¥367M
EBITDAn/a-CN¥324M-CN¥249MCN¥87.7MCN¥200M
Net income-CN¥99.7MCN¥92.3MCN¥32.5MCN¥332MCN¥212M
Free cash flow-CN¥226MCN¥98.5M-CN¥260MCN¥442MCN¥738M
Capital expenditureCN¥25.6MCN¥54.0MCN¥70.3MCN¥62.4MCN¥6.55M
Total debtCN¥59.7MCN¥73.0MCN¥28.3MCN¥57.1MCN¥242M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Shanghai Stonehill Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%+150%-20%0%+20%4733600588ACPPLHTFLRXO688411CCCMAASSEZLBILL3888301236LMNMPHASISTENBBBHUB002195.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Shanghai Stonehill Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%0×100×200×300×4733ACPRXO688411CCCSEZLBILL3888301236HUB002195.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Shanghai Stonehill Technology is the large dot.

Shanghai Stonehill Technology competitors and peer comparison

How Shanghai Stonehill Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Shanghai Stonehill Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure002195.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-2.6%+9.0%6th lowest of 21
6-month return-33.9%+20.2%2nd lowest of 19
Distance from 52-week high-56.9%-24.2%4th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+11.3%+13.5%8th lowest of 21
Operating margin-24.5%8.1%3rd lowest of 21
Forward P/E284.5×22.4×most expensive of 15
ROIC minus cost of capital-14.7 pp-1.1 pp4th lowest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Shanghai Stonehill Technology 002195.SZChina$4.77B-34%+11%-25%284.5×n/an/a
OBIC Business Consultants 4733.TJapan$4.74B+62%+12%47%36.1×3.2%+11.9%
Yonyou Network Technology 600588.SSChina$4.72B-21%+4%-16%n/an/an/a
Asseco Poland ACP.WAPoland$4.85B+31%+2%11%23.5×4.0%+6.6%
Beijing DeepZero Technology 2723.HKHong Kong$4.58Bn/a+31%1%n/an/an/a
Planet Labs PBC PLUnited States$4.57B-68%+44%-26%n/an/an/a
HeartFlow HTFLUnited States$4.56B+15%+40%-34%n/an/an/a
RXO RXOUnited States$4.55B+27%+10%0%53.0×n/an/a
Beijing HyperStrong Technology 688411.SSChina$4.99B-29%+38%12%16.7×n/an/a
CCC Intelligent Solutions CCCUnited States$4.54B+50%+11%18%15.1×11.2%+10.8%
Maase MAASUnited States$4.51B+7%-84%-16%n/an/an/a
Sezzle SEZLUnited States$5.05B+146%+43%40%22.4×28.8%+50.3%
BILL BILLUnited States$4.50B+25%+13%1%13.7×36.5%+47.3%
Baige Online Digital Technology 2672.HKHong Kong$5.07Bn/a+34%-3%n/an/an/a
Kingsoft 3888.HKHong Kong$4.46B+4%0%14%15.1×-5.8%+10.8%
iSoftStone Information Technology (Group) 301236.SZChina$5.13B-16%+13%0%105.2×n/an/a
Lumine LMN.VCanada$5.14B+38%+15%21%18.1×15.6%+36.8%
Mphasis MPHASIS.NSIndia$5.15B+15%+14%15%22.4×28.7%+10.6%
Tenable TENBUnited States$4.40B+93%+10%5%17.8×30.1%+17.8%
BlackBerry BB.TOCanada$5.16B+48%+14%16%40.8×33.6%-8.6%
HUB24 HUB.AXAustralia$4.39B-4%+23%29%42.6×35.6%+35.7%

Questions

Which companies are Shanghai Stonehill Technology's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: OBIC Business Consultants (4733.T), Yonyou Network Technology (600588.SS), Asseco Poland (ACP.WA), Beijing DeepZero Technology (2723.HK), Planet Labs PBC (PL), HeartFlow (HTFL), RXO (RXO), Beijing HyperStrong Technology (688411.SS).
Is Shanghai Stonehill Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 284.5× against a peer median of 22.4×, most expensive of 15 in its peer set.
How has Shanghai Stonehill Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -33.9% against +20.2% for the median peer; over one year -22.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.