Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 688411.SS Beijing HyperStrong Technology Co. Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Beijing HyperStrong Technology Co. Ltd. Class A688411.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Packaged Software

Chinese leader in battery energy-storage systems (BESS), providing full-stack storage solutions for power grids and renewable plants.

Momentum neutral 56
Mkt cap
$4.99B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
67%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$92.4M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
16.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+1.0 pp
WACC 12.3%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
180 days
5 May 2027
Close · CNYCN¥182.50
1D-1.2%
1W+33.6%
1M+11.4%
3M-11.6%
6M-29.1%
YTD-27.0%
1Y-38.2%
ATR %5.7%
52w lowhigh57.2% off high

What Beijing HyperStrong Technology does

Chinese leader in battery energy-storage systems (BESS), providing full-stack storage solutions for power grids and renewable plants.

Buys battery cells from suppliers, integrates them with inverters and its own control software into storage systems, and sells projects, so revenue follows large tender wins from state-owned power companies and renewable developers, and profit depends on its integration markup over cell costs. Revenue is recognised when projects are delivered and accepted, which makes timing lumpy.

Products and services

  • Utility-scale battery storage systems
  • Energy management/storage software
  • Storage for renewables & grid

Customers

  • Power grid operators
  • Renewable power plant developers
  • Industrial/commercial energy users

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Energy
  • Energy storage systems
  • Battery storage integration

What could go right

  • Global grid-scale storage capacity growth
  • Renewable curtailment/storage mandates

What could go wrong

  • Battery cell cost/price competition
  • Storage overcapacity risk

Moat: narrow (scale, installed base). Ranked #1 in domestic operational storage installations with a large global project base (60+ GWh).

Headquarters: Beijing, China · Employees: 1,418

Named competitors

Beijing HyperStrong Technology at a glance

Size Beijing HyperStrong Technology (688411.SS) is a China Information Technology company (Packaged Software) with a market value of $4.99B, the 503rd largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥182.50 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 29.1%, against +16.7% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 19 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 37.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +13.7%); the operating margin is 11.8% (peer median 14.5%).

Valuation It trades at 16.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 23.5× (5th cheapest of 16).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.0 points above its cost of capital (12.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 5 May 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

507510012511 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 123688411.SS 68
Six months, rebased to 100: Beijing HyperStrong Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Beijing HyperStrong Technology financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥15.1BCN¥11.6BCN¥8.26BCN¥6.96BCN¥2.62B
Revenue growth—+40%+19%+166%—
Gross profitCN¥3.28BCN¥2.06BCN¥1.50BCN¥1.31BCN¥519M
EBITDAn/aCN¥1.23BCN¥814MCN¥774MCN¥283M
Net incomeCN¥1.48BCN¥951MCN¥648MCN¥578MCN¥177M
Free cash flow-CN¥562MCN¥38.9MCN¥669M-CN¥83.4MCN¥581M
Capital expenditureCN¥949MCN¥473MCN¥218MCN¥186MCN¥49.9M
Total debtCN¥7.93BCN¥5.75BCN¥4.50BCN¥2.96BCN¥1.61B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Beijing HyperStrong Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%+150%-20%0%+20%SEZL301236LMNACPMPHASISBBAUTO00219547336005884704WAYPL002517HTFLRXOCCC688411.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Beijing HyperStrong Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%+60%0×100×200×300×SEZL301236LMNACPMPHASISBB002195002555WAY002517RXO688411.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Beijing HyperStrong Technology is the large dot.

Beijing HyperStrong Technology competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (688411.SS vs 300274.SZ vs 300827.SZ vs FLNC)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Beijing HyperStrong Technology 688411.SS$4.99B-29%+38%12%16.7×n/a
Sungrow Power Supply 300274.SZ$25.3B-40%-24%12%14.9×12.1%
Sineng Electric 300827.SZ$2.35B-25%+29%12%24.7×n/a
Fluence Energy FLNC$973M-78%+7%-4%n/an/a
Kehua Data 002335.SZ$2.81B-41%+5%5%31.4×16.7%

How Beijing HyperStrong Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Beijing HyperStrong Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure688411.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+11.4%+3.7%7th highest of 21
6-month return-29.1%+16.7%3rd lowest of 19
Distance from 52-week high-57.2%-24.0%2nd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+37.8%+13.7%5th highest of 21
Operating margin11.8%14.5%10th lowest of 21
Forward P/E16.7×23.5×5th cheapest of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital+1.0 pp-0.8 pp8th highest of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Beijing HyperStrong Technology 688411.SSChina$4.99B-29%+38%12%16.7×n/an/a
Sezzle SEZLUnited States$5.05B+146%+43%40%22.4×28.8%+50.3%
Baige Online Digital Technology 2672.HKHong Kong$5.07Bn/a+34%-3%n/an/an/a
iSoftStone Information Technology (Group) 301236.SZChina$5.13B-16%+13%0%105.2×n/an/a
Lumine LMN.VCanada$5.14B+38%+15%21%18.1×15.6%+36.8%
Asseco Poland ACP.WAPoland$4.85B+31%+2%11%23.5×4.0%+6.6%
Mphasis MPHASIS.NSIndia$5.15B+15%+14%15%22.4×28.7%+10.6%
BlackBerry BB.TOCanada$5.16B+48%+14%16%40.8×33.6%-8.6%
AutoStore AUTO.OLNorway$5.20B+8%+17%33%27.4×18.5%+27.0%
Shanghai Stonehill Technology 002195.SZChina$4.77B-34%+11%-25%284.5×n/an/a
OBIC Business Consultants 4733.TJapan$4.74B+62%+12%47%36.1×3.2%+11.9%
Yonyou Network Technology 600588.SSChina$4.72B-21%+4%-16%n/an/an/a
37 Interactive Entertainment Network Technology 002555.SZChina$5.29B-24%-10%14%14.2×5.0%+2.1%
Trend Micro 4704.TJapan$5.39B+18%+7%18%27.4×-4.1%+9.7%
Beijing DeepZero Technology 2723.HKHong Kong$4.58Bn/a+31%1%n/an/an/a
Waystar WAYUnited States$5.45B+33%+21%24%15.8×7.5%+16.0%
Planet Labs PBC PLUnited States$4.57B-68%+44%-26%n/an/an/a
Kingnet Network 002517.SZChina$5.47B-4%+62%29%13.7×6.3%+28.1%
HeartFlow HTFLUnited States$4.56B+15%+40%-34%n/an/an/a
RXO RXOUnited States$4.55B+27%+10%0%53.0×n/an/a
CCC Intelligent Solutions CCCUnited States$4.54B+50%+11%18%15.1×11.2%+10.8%

Questions

Who are Beijing HyperStrong Technology's main competitors?
Named competitors: Sungrow Power Supply (300274.SZ), Sineng Electric (300827.SZ), Fluence Energy (FLNC), Kehua Data (002335.SZ). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Sezzle (SEZL), Baige Online Digital Technology (2672.HK), iSoftStone Information Technology (Group) (301236.SZ), Lumine (LMN.V), Asseco Poland (ACP.WA), Mphasis (MPHASIS.NS).
Is Beijing HyperStrong Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 16.7× against a peer median of 23.5×, 5th cheapest of 16 in its peer set.
How has Beijing HyperStrong Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -29.1% against +16.7% for the median peer; over one year -38.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.