Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › AUTO.OL AutoStore Holdings Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

AutoStore Holdings Ltd.AUTO.OLCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Norway · NOK·Information Technology›Packaged Software

Norwegian maker of cube-based robotic warehouse storage and retrieval systems for e-commerce and logistics.

≈ A Norwegian Kiva Systems/Amazon Robotics competitorMomentum neutral 54
Mkt cap
$5.20B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
30%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$7.36M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
27.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-0.4 pp
WACC 10.5%
Hurdle
-9 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
97 days
11 Feb 2027
Close · NOKNOK 14.15
1D-0.1%
1W-3.8%
1M-11.3%
3M+5.1%
6M+8.4%
YTD+19.8%
1Y+47.6%
ATR %3.6%
52w lowhigh19.8% off high

What AutoStore does

Norwegian maker of cube-based robotic warehouse storage and retrieval systems for e-commerce and logistics.

Makes the grid, robots and software, but sells through integrator partners who design and install the warehouse project and deal with the end customer. After the first install it earns a continuing stream from software, service and spares. SoftBank holds a large stake, and the company listed in Oslo in 2021.

In one line: A Norwegian Kiva Systems/Amazon Robotics competitor.

Products and services

  • Cube storage grid system
  • Robots (bin picking)
  • Software/control system

Customers

  • E-commerce/retail distribution centers
  • 3PL logistics providers
  • Grocery/industrial warehouses

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Information technology
  • Warehouse automation/robotics
  • Automated storage & retrieval systems…

What could go right

  • Warehouse automation adoption (labor cost/scarcity)
  • E-commerce fulfillment demand

What could go wrong

  • Patent litigation exposure
  • Warehouse capex cyclicality

Moat: narrow (IP / patents, installed base, switching costs). Patented cube-storage design and integrator/partner network create switching costs once installed.

Headquarters: Nedre Vats, Norway · Founded: 1996 · Employees: 1,032

Named competitors

AutoStore at a glance

Size AutoStore (AUTO.OL) is a Norway Information Technology company (Packaged Software) with a market value of $5.20B, the 19th largest of 115 Norway companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NOK 14.15 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 8.4%, against +21.6% for the median peer and +2.7% for the Norway market (cap-weighted) — 8th lowest of 19 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 16.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +13.7%); the operating margin is 33.3% (peer median 15.6%).

Valuation It trades at 27.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 22.4× (6th most expensive of 19).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 18% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +27%, so the hurdle is -9 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.4 points below its cost of capital (10.5% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 11 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 123AUTO.OL 110
Six months, rebased to 100: AutoStore against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

AutoStore financials

Reported figures in NOK; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNOK 6.64BNOK 5.62BNOK 6.48BNOK 6.83BNOK 5.63B
Revenue growth—-13%-5%+21%—
Gross profitNOK 2.97BNOK 2.25BNOK 3.18BNOK 3.15BNOK 2.36B
EBITDANOK 2.86BNOK 2.31BNOK 3.08BNOK 3.04BNOK 2.46B
Net incomeNOK 1.61BNOK 849MNOK 1.47B-NOK 345MNOK 959M
Free cash flowNOK 1.71BNOK 702MNOK 1.15BNOK 1.21BNOK 783M
Capital expenditureNOK 541MNOK 579MNOK 621MNOK 545MNOK 415M
Total debtNOK 1.93BNOK 2.72BNOK 5.47BNOK 4.98BNOK 4.52B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

AutoStore competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%+100%+150%0%+20%BBMPHASISLMN301236002555SEZL4704688411WAY002517ACP002558VRNS4733600588KVYOAUTO.OL6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. AutoStore is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%0×100×200×300×BBMPHASISLMN301236002555SEZL688411002517ACP002558VRNS002195KVYOAUTO.OLRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. AutoStore is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%BBMPHASISLMN002555SEZL4704WAY002517ACPOCTV002558VRNS4733DOCSKVYOAUTO.OLGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. AutoStore is the large dot.

AutoStore competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (AUTO.OL vs OCDO.L vs KGX.DE vs 6383.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
AutoStore AUTO.OL$5.20B+8%+17%33%27.4×18.5%
Ocado OCDO.L$3.73B+77%-42%3%n/a39.1%
Kion KGX.DE$5.05B-25%+3%6%10.4×n/a
Daifuku 6383.T$10.9B-33%+21%15%18.9×14.7%
SYM SYM$22.3B-30%+20%1%101.9×n/a
Kardex KARN.SW$2.35B-9%+3%9%30.3×11.8%

How AutoStore compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

AutoStore against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureAUTO.OLPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-11.3%+4.6%lowest of 21
6-month return+8.4%+21.6%8th lowest of 19
Distance from 52-week high-19.8%-28.8%8th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+16.7%+13.7%9th highest of 21
Operating margin33.3%15.6%4th highest of 21
Forward P/E27.4×22.4×6th most expensive of 19
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)18.5%7.5%5th most demanding of 16
Growth delivered (Del g)+27.0%+16.0%5th highest of 16
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-8.5 pp-8.7 pp8th most demanding of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital-0.4 pp+1.0 pp8th lowest of 19
EV / EBITDA17.2×16.5×6th cheapest of 11
Net debt / EBITDA0.3×-0.4×3rd most indebted of 11

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
AutoStore AUTO.OLNorway$5.20B+8%+17%33%27.4×18.5%+27.0%
BlackBerry BB.TOCanada$5.16B+48%+14%16%40.8×33.6%-8.6%
Mphasis MPHASIS.NSIndia$5.15B+15%+14%15%22.4×28.7%+10.6%
Lumine LMN.VCanada$5.14B+38%+15%21%18.1×15.6%+36.8%
iSoftStone Information Technology (Group) 301236.SZChina$5.13B-16%+13%0%105.2×n/an/a
37 Interactive Entertainment Network Technology 002555.SZChina$5.29B-24%-10%14%14.2×5.0%+2.1%
Baige Online Digital Technology 2672.HKHong Kong$5.07Bn/a+34%-3%n/an/an/a
Sezzle SEZLUnited States$5.05B+146%+43%40%22.4×28.8%+50.3%
Trend Micro 4704.TJapan$5.39B+18%+7%18%27.4×-4.1%+9.7%
Beijing HyperStrong Technology 688411.SSChina$4.99B-29%+38%12%16.7×n/an/a
Waystar WAYUnited States$5.45B+33%+21%24%15.8×7.5%+16.0%
Kingnet Network 002517.SZChina$5.47B-4%+62%29%13.7×6.3%+28.1%
Asseco Poland ACP.WAPoland$4.85B+31%+2%11%23.5×4.0%+6.6%
Octave Intelligence OCTVUnited States$5.60Bn/a+1%20%14.7×17.0%+1.3%
Giant Network 002558.SZChina$5.61B-35%+105%48%10.0×-2.1%+17.9%
Varonis Systems VRNSUnited States$5.63B+71%+18%-25%138.0×23.0%+16.3%
Shanghai Stonehill Technology 002195.SZChina$4.77B-34%+11%-25%284.5×n/an/a
OBIC Business Consultants 4733.TJapan$4.74B+62%+12%47%36.1×3.2%+11.9%
Yonyou Network Technology 600588.SSChina$4.72B-21%+4%-16%n/an/an/a
Doximity DOCSUnited States$5.79B+25%+11%31%23.3×16.3%+25.5%
Klaviyo KVYOUnited States$5.90B+36%+29%-2%19.7×7.0%+37.7%

Questions

Who are AutoStore's main competitors?
Named competitors: Ocado Group (tech licensing) (OCDO.L), Dematic (KION Group) (KGX.DE), Exotec (private) (private or unlisted), Daifuku (6383.T), Symbotic (SYM), Kardex (KARN.SW). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes BlackBerry (BB.TO), Mphasis (MPHASIS.NS), Lumine (LMN.V), iSoftStone Information Technology (Group) (301236.SZ), 37 Interactive Entertainment Network Technology (002555.SZ), Baige Online Digital Technology (2672.HK).
Is AutoStore expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 27.4× against a peer median of 22.4×, 6th most expensive of 19 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 18% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +27%, so the hurdle is -9 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has AutoStore stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +8.4% against +21.6% for the median peer; over one year +47.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.