Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › QQ..L QinetiQ Group plcOpen in the cockpit ↗

QinetiQ Group plcQQ..LCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United Kingdom · GBP·Industrials›Aerospace & Defense

UK defense technology company providing testing, R&D and evaluation services plus specialized defense products.

≈ A UK Leidos for defense R&D and testingMomentum strong 63
Mkt cap
$3.51B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
84%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$8.40M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
15.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+12.6 pp
WACC 7.8%
Hurdle
-8 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
6 days
12 Nov 2026
Close · GBP£513.00
1D-2.3%
1W-5.1%
1M+13.0%
3M-9.0%
6M+26.4%
YTD+16.2%
1Y+15.3%
ATR %3.2%
52w lowhigh11.0% off high

What QinetiQ does

UK defense technology company providing testing, R&D and evaluation services plus specialized defense products.

Earns mostly from governments under long contracts, with the UK Ministry of Defence the largest customer; test-range operation for the MoD runs under a long-term partnering agreement, giving a steady base. Born in 2001 from the government's defence research agency and floated in 2006, it has built a growing US business.

In one line: A UK Leidos for defense R&D and testing.

Products and services

  • Test & evaluation services
  • Defense R&D/engineering services
  • Robotics & unmanned systems
  • Cyber/EW products

Customers

  • UK Ministry of Defence
  • US Department of Defense
  • Allied governments

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Aerospace & Defense
  • Defense technology services
  • Testing, evaluation, R&D & products

What could go right

  • Rising NATO/UK defense budgets
  • US market expansion

What could go wrong

  • Government budget/procurement delays
  • Contract concentration with MoD

Moat: narrow (regulatory licence, installed base, IP / patents). Owns unique UK MoD test ranges and long-standing government security clearances.

Headquarters: Farnborough, UK · Founded: 2001 · Employees: 7,378

Named competitors

QinetiQ at a glance

Size QinetiQ (QQ..L) is a United Kingdom Industrials company (Aerospace & Defense) with a market value of $3.51B, the 119th largest of 363 United Kingdom companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at £513.00 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 26.4%, against -16.5% for the median peer and +3.6% for the United Kingdom market (cap-weighted) — highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 0.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +1.9%); the operating margin is 10.1% (peer median 1.2%).

Valuation It trades at 15.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 45.7× (2nd cheapest of 17).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 0% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is -8 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 12.6 points above its cost of capital (7.8% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 12 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012014011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026QQ..L 125Peer median 82
Six months, rebased to 100: QinetiQ against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

QinetiQ financials

Reported figures in GBP; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue£1.92B£1.92B£1.93B£1.91B£1.58B
Revenue growth—0%+1%+21%—
Gross profit£194M£546M£504M£506M£480M
EBITDA£314M£313M£263M£268M£227M
Net income£108M£108M-£186M£140M£154M
Free cash flow£172M£172M£126M£157M£111M
Capital expenditure£72.5M£72.5M£109M£96.3M£109M
Total debtn/a£423M£429M£392M£369M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

QinetiQ competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%0%+10%688563600038FLYACHR000738FII600316600967R3NK601606688297BDLAIR300456MRCY600435002389301696QQ..L6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. QinetiQ is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-50%0%+50%+100%0×50×100×688563600038000738FII600316R3NK6882972357BDL000519AIR300456MRCY600435002389QQ..LRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. QinetiQ is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%+60%0%20%40%60%688563600038FII600316600967R3NK000519AIR300456MRCY600435301696QQ..LGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. QinetiQ is the large dot.

QinetiQ competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (QQ..L vs BA..L vs LDOS vs BAB.L)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
QinetiQ QQ..L$3.51B+26%0%10%15.3×0.1%
BAE Systems BA..L$72.6B-4%+7%9%22.0×2.8%
Leidos LDOS$16.2B+2%+3%12%11.4×-6.4%
Babcock International BAB.L$6.60B0%+7%6%15.4×13.2%
Chemring CHG.L$1.92B+13%-4%13%27.0×n/a

How QinetiQ compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

QinetiQ against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureQQ..LPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+13.0%-0.2%highest of 21
6-month return+26.4%-16.5%highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-11.0%-40.0%highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-0.5%+1.9%10th lowest of 20
Operating margin10.1%1.2%4th highest of 21
Forward P/E15.3×45.7×2nd cheapest of 17
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)0.1%26.4%least demanding of 13
Growth delivered (Del g)+8.5%+7.7%5th highest of 13
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-8.4 pp+11.7 pp2nd least demanding of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital+12.6 pp-5.4 pp2nd highest of 21
EV / EBITDA8.8×14.2×cheapest of 7
Net debt / EBITDA0.5×1.0×4th least indebted of 8

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
QinetiQ QQ..LUnited Kingdom$3.51B+26%0%10%15.3×0.1%+8.5%
Baimtec Material 688563.SSChina$3.53B-12%-1%15%38.2×22.7%+14.4%
Avicopter 600038.SSChina$3.54B-8%-6%1%33.9×9.1%+8.1%
Firefly Aerospace FLYUnited States$3.48B-48%+179%-116%n/an/an/a
Archer Aviation ACHRUnited States$3.42B-31%n/a-13,570%n/an/an/a
AECC Aero-engine Control 000738.SZChina$3.66B-10%-3%3%64.0×n/an/a
Lisi FII.PAFrance$3.27B0%-8%10%22.5×20.4%+7.3%
Jiangxi Hongdu Aviation Industry 600316.SSChina$3.77B-4%+62%0%121.0×53.4%+8.0%
Inner Mongolia First Machinery 600967.SSChina$3.22B-10%-7%0%26.0×38.2%-5.4%
RENK R3NK.DEGermany$3.84B-24%+11%13%21.1×29.8%+54.5%
Anhui GreatWall Military Industry 601606.SSChina$3.20B-22%-10%-7%n/an/an/a
Avic (Chengdu) UAS 688297.SSChina$3.93B-15%+74%0%106.5×n/an/a
AviChina Industry & Technology 2357.HKHong Kong$3.11B-13%+2%5%8.1×n/an/a
Bharat Dynamics BDL.NSIndia$4.12B-28%-19%10%47.2×n/an/a
North Industries Group Red Arrow 000519.SZChina$2.88B-22%+100%1%57.5×23.0%+7.5%
Aar AIRUnited States$4.39B-7%+22%9%18.4×13.2%+14.9%
Sai MicroElectronics 300456.SZChina$2.75B-45%-59%-99%65.9×41.7%+1.5%
Mercury Systems MRCYUnited States$4.48B-19%+8%2%44.2×59.6%+1.3%
North Navigation Control Technology 600435.SSChina$2.65B-19%-32%-5%97.4×17.1%+6.8%
Aerospace CH UAV 002389.SZChina$2.64B-17%+3%0%54.9×n/an/a
Nanchang Sanrui Intelligence Technology 301696.SZChina$4.87B-14%+29%45%n/a36.1%+43.7%

Questions

Who are QinetiQ's main competitors?
Named competitors: BAE Systems (BA..L), Leidos Holdings (LDOS), Babcock International (BAB.L), Chemring Group (CHG.L). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Baimtec Material (688563.SS), Avicopter (600038.SS), Firefly Aerospace (FLY), Archer Aviation (ACHR), AECC Aero-engine Control (000738.SZ), Lisi (FII.PA).
Is QinetiQ expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 15.3× against a peer median of 45.7×, 2nd cheapest of 17 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 0% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is -8 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has QinetiQ stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +26.4% against -16.5% for the median peer; over one year +15.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.