Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › MRCY Mercury Systems, Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

Mercury Systems, Inc.MRCYCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Industrials›Aerospace & Defense

Makes rugged, secure processing and RF/microwave subsystems embedded in radar, electronic-warfare and sensor systems for defense primes.

Momentum weak 20
Mkt cap
$4.48B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
99%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$50.7M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
44.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-8.4 pp
WACC 9.3%
Hurdle
+58 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
4 days
10 Nov 2026
Close · USD$73.55
1D+12.2%
1W-5.2%
1M-6.3%
3M-32.3%
6M-18.6%
YTD+0.7%
1Y-5.9%
ATR %6.2%
Beta1.98
52w lowhigh42.7% off high

What Mercury Systems does

Makes rugged, secure processing and RF/microwave subsystems embedded in radar, electronic-warfare and sensor systems for defense primes.

Wins design contracts on specific defense programs, then earns production revenue for the life of that program, so revenue is tied to program schedules and US defense budgets. Fixed-price development work has been costly when it ran over, and the company has been consolidating its operations and refocusing on manufacturing efficiency.

Products and services

  • Secure processing modules
  • RF and microwave subsystems
  • Multi-chip modules/microelectronics

Customers

  • Lockheed Martin
  • RTX
  • Northrop Grumman
  • US Department of Defense

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Defense electronics
  • Embedded processing and RF subsystems
  • Commercial-off-the-shelf ruggedized…

What could go right

  • Defense electronics content growth per platform
  • Radar/EW modernization programs

What could go wrong

  • Past program execution/quality issues
  • Customer concentration among a few primes

Moat: narrow (customer qualification, IP / patents, process know-how). Designed into major primes' radar/EW programs; requalifying an alternate supplier mid-program is costly.

Headquarters: Andover, Massachusetts, US · Founded: 1981 · Employees: 2,102

Named competitors

Mercury Systems at a glance

Size Mercury Systems (MRCY) is a United States Industrials company (Aerospace & Defense) with a market value of $4.48B, the 1267th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $73.55 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 18.6%, against -14.9% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 9th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 7.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +11.4%); the operating margin is 2.1% (peer median 8.0%).

Valuation It trades at 44.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 33.7× (7th most expensive of 17).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 60% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +1%, so the hurdle is +58 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 8.4 points below its cost of capital (9.3% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $1.08B at 3 Jul 2026, up 37% on a year earlier — 1.1 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Short interest Short interest is 9.1% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 10 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012014011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 85MRCY 80
Six months, rebased to 100: Mercury Systems against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Mercury Systems financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2026-06-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023
Revenue$984M$984M$912M$835M$974M
Revenue growth—+8%+9%-14%—
Gross profit$242M$242M$213M$148M$263M
EBITDA$93.6M$93.6M$71.6M-$31.8M$91.1M
Net income-$29.7M-$29.7M-$37.9M-$138M-$28.3M
Free cash flow$64.9M$64.9M$117M$26.1M-$60.0M
Capital expenditure$34.3M$34.3M$19.8M$34.3M$38.8M
Total debt$501M$501M$656M$666M$589M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Mercury Systems competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-20%-10%0%+10%AIRBDL301696688297AMTMR3NK079550600316600562000738688563QQAVAVFLYACHRJOBYKRMNHXLFIIMRCY6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Mercury Systems is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-25%0%+25%+50%+75%0×50×100×AIRBDL688297AMTMR3NK079550600316600562000738600038688563QQAVAVKRMNFIIMRCYRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Mercury Systems is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%+60%0%20%40%60%AIR301696AMTMR3NK600316600038688563QQHXLFIIMRCYGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Mercury Systems is the large dot.

Mercury Systems competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (MRCY vs CW vs LHX vs KTOS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Mercury Systems MRCY$4.48B-19%+8%2%44.2×59.6%
Curtiss-Wright CW$17.1B-36%+11%19%27.4×16.2%
L3Harris LHX$48.4B-13%+7%12%20.1×7.0%
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions KTOS$6.59B-39%+26%2%36.4×n/a
Teledyne Technologies TDY$28.5B0%+8%20%22.9×15.5%

How Mercury Systems compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Mercury Systems against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureMRCYPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-6.3%+1.9%4th lowest of 21
6-month return-18.6%-14.9%9th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-42.7%-39.5%10th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+7.8%+11.4%9th lowest of 20
Operating margin2.1%8.0%8th lowest of 21
Forward P/E44.2×33.7×7th most expensive of 17
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)59.6%21.5%most demanding of 11
Growth delivered (Del g)+1.3%+11.5%lowest of 11
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+58.3 pp-0.4 ppmost demanding of 11
ROIC minus cost of capital-8.4 pp-1.7 pp5th lowest of 20
EV / EBITDA50.9×16.0×2nd most expensive of 11
Net debt / EBITDA3.1×1.5×4th most indebted of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Mercury Systems MRCYUnited States$4.48B-19%+8%2%44.2×59.6%+1.3%
Aar AIRUnited States$4.39B-7%+22%9%18.4×13.2%+14.9%
Bharat Dynamics BDL.NSIndia$4.12B-28%-19%10%47.2×n/an/a
Nanchang Sanrui Intelligence Technology 301696.SZChina$4.87B-14%+29%45%n/a36.1%+43.7%
Avic (Chengdu) UAS 688297.SSChina$3.93B-15%+74%0%106.5×n/an/a
Amentum AMTMUnited States$5.20B-13%+11%4%8.4×1.7%+23.3%
RENK R3NK.DEGermany$3.84B-24%+11%13%21.1×29.8%+54.5%
LIG Defense&Aerospace 079550.KSSouth Korea$5.24B-65%+26%8%20.0×n/an/a
Jiangxi Hongdu Aviation Industry 600316.SSChina$3.77B-4%+62%0%121.0×53.4%+8.0%
Glarun Technology 600562.SSChina$5.43B+6%-8%21%51.7×n/an/a
AECC Aero-engine Control 000738.SZChina$3.66B-10%-3%3%64.0×n/an/a
Avicopter 600038.SSChina$3.54B-8%-6%1%33.9×9.1%+8.1%
Baimtec Material 688563.SSChina$3.53B-12%-1%15%38.2×22.7%+14.4%
QinetiQ QQ..LUnited Kingdom$3.51B+26%0%10%15.3×0.1%+8.5%
AeroVironment AVAVUnited States$5.73B-33%+84%1%33.5×n/an/a
Firefly Aerospace FLYUnited States$3.48B-48%+179%-116%n/an/an/a
Archer Aviation ACHRUnited States$3.42B-31%n/a-13,570%n/an/an/a
Joby Aviation JOBYUnited States$5.89B-45%+118,568%-754%n/an/an/a
Karman KRMNUnited States$6.04B-25%+50%19%57.5×n/an/a
Hexcel HXLUnited States$6.09B-16%+8%11%29.6×23.0%+4.5%
Lisi FII.PAFrance$3.27B0%-8%10%22.5×20.4%+7.3%

Mercury Systems backlog

Mercury Systems reported $1.08B of remaining performance obligations at 3 Jul 2026, up 37% from a year earlier and up 26% from the previous quarter. That is 1.1 years of trailing revenue already under contract. Book-to-bill last quarter: 1.77.

Questions

Who are Mercury Systems's main competitors?
Named competitors: Curtiss-Wright (CW), L3Harris Technologies (LHX), Kratos Defense (KTOS), Teledyne Technologies (TDY). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Aar (AIR), Bharat Dynamics (BDL.NS), Nanchang Sanrui Intelligence Technology (301696.SZ), Avic (Chengdu) UAS (688297.SS), Amentum (AMTM), RENK (R3NK.DE).
Is Mercury Systems expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 44.2× against a peer median of 33.7×, 7th most expensive of 17 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 60% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +1%, so the hurdle is +58 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Mercury Systems stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -18.6% against -14.9% for the median peer; over one year -5.9%.
What is Mercury Systems's backlog?
Mercury Systems's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $1.08B at 3 Jul 2026, +37% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.