Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › CW Curtiss-Wright CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

Curtiss-Wright CorporationCWCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Industrials›Aerospace & Defense

Maker of specialized components and systems for aerospace, defense, naval nuclear and industrial customers.

Momentum laggard 14
Mkt cap
$17.1B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$215M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
27.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+5.7 pp
WACC 9.3%
Hurdle
+8 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
103 days
17 Feb 2027
Close · USD$463.47
1D+6.8%
1W-2.6%
1M-8.6%
3M-33.2%
6M-36.4%
YTD-15.9%
1Y-20.8%
ATR %4.5%
Beta1.22
52w lowhigh42.6% off high

What Curtiss-Wright does

Maker of specialized components and systems for aerospace, defense, naval nuclear and industrial customers.

Builds to order for naval programmes, so revenue follows the shipbuilding schedules of the US Navy's submarines and carriers, with the company supplying the reactor coolant pumps (the pumps that circulate coolant through the ship's reactor) for those ships. Commercial aerospace and industrial sales, including parts that earn again as aircraft age, make up the rest.

Products and services

  • Naval nuclear propulsion components
  • Aerospace actuation/flight systems
  • Defense electronics/sensors
  • Industrial valves/pumps

Customers

  • US Navy (submarine/carrier programs)
  • Aerospace/defense OEMs

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Aerospace & defense
  • Specialized aerospace, defense & naval…

What could go right

  • Submarine/naval build-rate growth
  • Aerospace aftermarket demand

What could go wrong

  • Defense program budget/timing risk
  • Naval supply-chain capacity constraints

Moat: narrow (customer qualification, regulatory licence, process know-how). Sole-source qualification on naval nuclear propulsion components built over decades of Navy programs.

Headquarters: Davidson, North Carolina, US · Founded: 1929 · Employees: 9,100

Named competitors

Curtiss-Wright at a glance

Size Curtiss-Wright (CW) is a United States Industrials company (Aerospace & Defense) with a market value of $17.1B, the 547th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $463.47 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 36.4%, against -2.9% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 10.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +16.7%); the operating margin is 18.9% (peer median 10.1%).

Valuation It trades at 27.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 24.8× (9th most expensive of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 16% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is +8 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 5.7 points above its cost of capital (9.3% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $4.60B at 30 Sep 2026, up 18% on a year earlier — 1.2 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Short interest Short interest is 2.6% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 17 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 96CW 64
Six months, rebased to 100: Curtiss-Wright against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Curtiss-Wright financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$3.65B$3.50B$3.12B$2.85B$2.56B
Revenue growth—+12%+10%+11%—
Gross profit$1.38B$1.30B$1.15B$1.07B$955M
EBITDA$810M$763M$651M$601M$540M
Net income$541M$484M$405M$355M$294M
Free cash flow$625M$554M$483M$403M$257M
Capital expenditure$95.8M$89.7M$61.0M$44.7M$38.2M
Total debt$1.15B$1.17B$1.23B$1.21B$1.43B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Curtiss-Wright competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-20%0%FTAI600893CSGTXTEMBJ600760MTXARXSBBD-BS63012450CRAXONHIIAMBWXT002179MOG-AHAG000768CW6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Curtiss-Wright is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%+60%20×40×FTAI600893CSGTXTEMBJ600760MTXARXSBBD-BS63012450CRAXONHIIAM002179HAG000768CWRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Curtiss-Wright is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%TXTEMBJMTXBBD-BS63012450CRHIIAMBWXTMOG-AHAGCWGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Curtiss-Wright is the large dot.

Curtiss-Wright competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (CW vs HWM vs TDG vs GD)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Curtiss-Wright CW$17.1B-36%+11%19%27.4×16.2%
Howmet Aerospace HWM$81.8B-24%+22%28%32.6×24.1%
TransDigm TDG$66.2B-1%+17%47%25.5×9.7%
General Dynamics GD$95.7B+3%+10%10%19.4×-2.5%
Parker Hannifin PH$116B+4%+8%22%24.4×19.0%

How Curtiss-Wright compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Curtiss-Wright against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureCWPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-8.6%+3.7%6th lowest of 21
6-month return-36.4%-2.9%3rd lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-42.6%-25.8%6th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+10.5%+16.7%5th lowest of 21
Operating margin18.9%10.1%4th highest of 21
Forward P/E27.4×24.8×9th most expensive of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)16.2%12.2%6th most demanding of 14
Growth delivered (Del g)+7.9%+8.7%6th lowest of 13
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+8.3 pp+0.8 pp5th most demanding of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital+5.7 pp+3.0 pp8th highest of 20
EV / EBITDA22.2×17.2×4th most expensive of 15
Net debt / EBITDA0.8×2.0×4th least indebted of 16

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Curtiss-Wright CWUnited States$17.1B-36%+11%19%27.4×16.2%+7.9%
FTAI Aviation FTAIUnited States$18.4B-33%+46%23%16.7×n/an/a
AECC Aviation Power 600893.SSChina$15.8B-15%+18%2%173.7×n/an/a
Csg CSG.ASNetherlands$14.6B-20%+72%25%11.7×n/an/a
Textron TXTUnited States$14.2B-8%+9%7%11.9×8.3%+4.9%
Embraer S.A. Sponsored ADR EMBJUnited States$14.1B+23%+20%8%23.6×16.9%+14.5%
AVIC Shenyang Aircraft 600760.SSChina$20.8B+4%-1%8%45.1×n/an/a
MTU Aero Engines MTX.DEGermany$20.9B+21%+12%13%18.5×6.3%+17.1%
Arxis ARXSUnited States$21.5B+42%+114%20%54.2×58.8%n/a
Bombardier BBD-B.TOCanada$22.5B+8%+11%11%22.1×19.0%+8.9%
Singapore Technologies Engineering S63.SISingapore$22.6B-13%+11%9%27.3×5.3%+11.5%
Hanwha Aerospace 012450.KSSouth Korea$25.0B-53%+28%11%17.2×-7.0%+38.1%
Crane CRUnited States$11.6B+11%+22%18%25.8×17.5%-3.5%
Axon Enterprise AXONUnited States$25.4B-22%+35%1%36.5×n/an/a
Huntington Ingalls Industries HIIUnited States$11.4B-8%+13%5%14.4×5.3%+5.9%
Dassault Aviation AM.PAFrance$26.0B+6%+33%9%19.6×5.2%+6.2%
BWX Technologies BWXTUnited States$11.0B-42%+18%10%23.8×19.6%+8.5%
Jonhon Optronic Technology 002179.SZChina$10.7B-7%+6%11%30.4×n/an/a
Moog MOG-AUnited States$10.3B+3%+16%12%27.8×15.1%+6.0%
Hensoldt HAG.DEGermany$10.0B+2%+15%10%41.3×12.2%+15.3%
AVIC Xi'an Aircraft Industry 000768.SZChina$9.92B+1%-34%3%55.7×n/an/a

Curtiss-Wright backlog

Curtiss-Wright reported $4.60B of remaining performance obligations at 30 Sep 2026, up 18% from a year earlier and up 2% from the previous quarter. That is 1.2 years of trailing revenue already under contract. Book-to-bill last quarter: 1.10.

Questions

Who are Curtiss-Wright's main competitors?
Named competitors: Howmet Aerospace (HWM), TransDigm Group (TDG), General Dynamics (Electric Boat) (GD), Parker Hannifin (PH). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes FTAI Aviation (FTAI), AECC Aviation Power (600893.SS), Csg (CSG.AS), Textron (TXT), Embraer S.A. Sponsored ADR (EMBJ), AVIC Shenyang Aircraft (600760.SS).
Is Curtiss-Wright expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 27.4× against a peer median of 24.8×, 9th most expensive of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 16% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is +8 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Curtiss-Wright stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -36.4% against -2.9% for the median peer; over one year -20.8%.
What is Curtiss-Wright's backlog?
Curtiss-Wright's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $4.60B at 30 Sep 2026, +18% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.