Loading…

Crane CompanyCRCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Industrials›Aerospace & Defense

Diversified industrial maker of aerospace/electronics components and process-flow, fluid-handling equipment for aerospace and process industries.

Momentum neutral 54
Mkt cap
$11.6B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
99%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$92.6M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
25.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+3.6 pp
WACC 9.7%
Hurdle
+21 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BB / BB
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
87 days
1 Feb 2027
Close · USD$201.06
1D+1.6%
1W+1.5%
1M-0.5%
3M-8.3%
6M+10.9%
YTD+9.0%
1Y+5.3%
ATR %4.0%
Beta1.36
52w lowhigh12.8% off high

What Crane does

Diversified industrial maker of aerospace/electronics components and process-flow, fluid-handling equipment for aerospace and process industries.

Its parts go into aircraft and process plants when they are built and are bought again as replacements, so repair and aftermarket demand adds to original-equipment sales. It was split off in 2023 from Crane Holdings, whose payment-technology business became Crane NXT, leaving this company focused on aerospace and process flow.

Products and services

  • Aerospace and Electronics
  • Process Flow Technologies (valves, pumps)
  • Engineered Materials

Customers

  • Boeing
  • Airbus
  • Chemical/process industry
  • Aerospace MROs

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Diversified manufacturing
  • Aerospace and fluid-handling equipment

What could go right

  • Aerospace aftermarket recovery
  • Process-industry capex cycles

What could go wrong

  • Cyclical industrial/chemical capex
  • Aerospace program concentration

Moat: narrow (switching costs, customer qualification, installed base). Qualified positions on aircraft platforms and process-critical valves create high switching costs.

Headquarters: Stamford, Connecticut, US · Founded: 1855 · Employees: 7,100

Named competitors

Crane at a glance

Size Crane (CR) is a United States Industrials company (Aerospace & Defense) with a market value of $11.6B, the 708th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $201.06 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 10.9%, against -12.9% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 3rd highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 21.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +16.7%); the operating margin is 17.7% (peer median 10.1%).

Valuation It trades at 25.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 27.6× (9th cheapest of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 18% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -4%, so the hurdle is +21 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.6 points above its cost of capital (9.7% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $1.89B at 30 Sep 2026, up 32% on a year earlier — 0.7 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Credit Crane has 2 bonds outstanding ($550M), rated BB by the agencies and trading like BB at a weighted spread of 242 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 2.1% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 1 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026CR 110Peer median 86
Six months, rebased to 100: Crane against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Crane financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$2.76B$2.31B$2.13B$1.86B$2.04B
Revenue growth—+8%+14%-8%—
Gross profit$1.15B$973M$868M$751M$714M
EBITDA$582M$474M$407M$286M$240M
Net income$342M$323M$295M$256M$401M
Free cash flow$384M$341M$236M$189M-$509M
Capital expenditure$47.2M$53.5M$36.6M$39.0M$37.1M
Total debt$946M$1.22B$319M$315M$461M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Crane competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-20%0%HIIBWXT002179MOG-AHAG000768EMBJTXTCSGDRS688002600893600372CWMRO047810FTAILOAR272210CR6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Crane is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%+60%25×50×75×HIIBWXT002179MOG-AHAG000768EMBJTXTCSGDRS688002600893600372047810FTAILOAR272210KTOSCRRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Crane is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%0%20%HIIBWXTMOG-AHAGEMBJTXTDRS688002CWMROLOARCRGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Crane is the large dot.

Crane competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (CR vs PH vs CW vs CIR.MI)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Crane CR$11.6B+11%+22%18%25.8×17.5%
Parker Hannifin PH$116B+4%+8%22%24.4×19.0%
Curtiss-Wright CW$17.1B-36%+11%19%27.4×16.2%
CIR S.p.A. - Compagnie Industriali Riunite CIR.MI$776M+12%0%6%13.4×2.3%
Flowserve FLS$10.2B+13%0%14%17.8×15.0%
Woodward WWD$18.7B-14%+22%16%31.0×18.9%

How Crane compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Crane against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureCRPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-0.5%+3.0%10th lowest of 21
6-month return+10.9%-12.9%3rd highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-12.8%-34.3%3rd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+21.5%+16.7%8th highest of 21
Operating margin17.7%10.1%6th highest of 21
Forward P/E25.8×27.6×9th cheapest of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)17.5%15.3%4th most demanding of 12
Growth delivered (Del g)-3.5%+7.9%2nd lowest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+21.1 pp+2.3 pp2nd most demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital+3.6 pp+1.3 pp8th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA21.1×17.8×7th most expensive of 14
Net debt / EBITDA1.1×1.8×5th least indebted of 14
Bond spread242 bpn/a—

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Crane CRUnited States$11.6B+11%+22%18%25.8×17.5%-3.5%
Huntington Ingalls Industries HIIUnited States$11.4B-8%+13%5%14.4×5.3%+5.9%
BWX Technologies BWXTUnited States$11.0B-42%+18%10%23.8×19.6%+8.5%
Jonhon Optronic Technology 002179.SZChina$10.7B-7%+6%11%30.4×n/an/a
Moog MOG-AUnited States$10.3B+3%+16%12%27.8×15.1%+6.0%
Hensoldt HAG.DEGermany$10.0B+2%+15%10%41.3×12.2%+15.3%
AVIC Xi'an Aircraft Industry 000768.SZChina$9.92B+1%-34%3%55.7×n/an/a
Embraer S.A. Sponsored ADR EMBJUnited States$14.1B+23%+20%8%23.6×16.9%+14.5%
Textron TXTUnited States$14.2B-8%+9%7%11.9×8.3%+4.9%
Csg CSG.ASNetherlands$14.6B-20%+72%25%11.7×n/an/a
Leonardo DRS DRSUnited States$9.08B-18%+9%11%23.1×4.6%+5.6%
Raytron Technology 688002.SSChina$8.64B-15%+84%29%26.4×20.1%+32.1%
AECC Aviation Power 600893.SSChina$15.8B-15%+18%2%173.7×n/an/a
AVIC Airborne Systems 600372.SSChina$8.36B-11%-2%5%48.1×n/an/a
Curtiss-Wright CWUnited States$17.1B-36%+11%19%27.4×16.2%+7.9%
Melrose Industries MRO.LUnited Kingdom$7.80B-4%+9%11%13.4×15.3%-12.8%
Korea Aerospace 047810.KSSouth Korea$7.37B-39%+44%6%45.4×n/an/a
FTAI Aviation FTAIUnited States$18.4B-33%+46%23%16.7×n/an/a
Loar LOARUnited States$7.05B+26%+30%25%52.2×29.1%+27.5%
Hanwha Systems 272210.KSSouth Korea$6.93B-57%+30%6%82.5×n/an/a
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions KTOSUnited States$6.59B-39%+26%2%36.4×n/an/a

Crane bonds and credit

Crane has 2 bonds outstanding with $550M face value. The agencies rate it BB; its bonds trade like BB. Weighted yield 7.54%, a spread of 242 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Crane backlog

Crane reported $1.89B of remaining performance obligations at 30 Sep 2026, up 32% from a year earlier and up 0% from the previous quarter. That is 0.7 years of trailing revenue already under contract. Book-to-bill last quarter: 1.01.

Questions

Who are Crane's main competitors?
Named competitors: Parker Hannifin (PH), Curtiss-Wright (CW), CIRCOR International (CIR.MI), Flowserve (FLS), Woodward (WWD). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII), BWX Technologies (BWXT), Jonhon Optronic Technology (002179.SZ), Moog (MOG-A), Hensoldt (HAG.DE), AVIC Xi'an Aircraft Industry (000768.SZ).
Is Crane expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 25.8× against a peer median of 27.6×, 9th cheapest of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 18% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -4%, so the hurdle is +21 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Crane stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +10.9% against -12.9% for the median peer; over one year +5.3%.
What is Crane's backlog?
Crane's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $1.89B at 30 Sep 2026, +32% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.