Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 272210.KS Hanwha SystemsOpen in the cockpit ↗

Hanwha Systems272210.KSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

South Korea · KRW·Industrials›Aerospace & Defense

Korean defense electronics maker of naval combat systems, radar and sensors, now also building satellites for a broadband constellation.

≈ Korea's L3Harris — combat electronics plus a new satellite venture.Momentum laggard 17
Mkt cap
$6.93B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
39%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$49.1M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
82.5×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-4.3 pp
WACC 7.9%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
131 days
17 Mar 2027
Close · KRW₩50,300
1D-6.7%
1W-16.9%
1M-35.2%
3M-27.2%
6M-57.1%
YTD-7.2%
1Y-10.3%
ATR %12.8%
52w lowhigh72.6% off high

What Hanwha Systems does

Korean defense electronics maker of naval combat systems, radar and sensors, now also building satellites for a broadband constellation.

Paid through multi-year defence programmes awarded by the Korean state, with revenue following delivery milestones on each warship, radar or sensor system. A Hanwha group member, it also sells IT services to group affiliates. Its push into satellite communications, including its own antenna technology, is a new direction beyond defence.

In one line: Korea's L3Harris — combat electronics plus a new satellite venture..

Products and services

  • Naval combat management systems
  • Radar & EO/IR sensors
  • Low-earth-orbit broadband satellites
  • IT/ICT systems integration
  • Armored vehicle electronics

Customers

  • Korean Navy
  • Republic of Korea military
  • Hanwha group affiliates
  • export defense customers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Defense & aerospace
  • Combat systems, avionics & satellites
  • Naval combat management systems…

What could go right

  • Naval modernization programs
  • LEO satellite/UAM optionality
  • Export of combat systems

What could go wrong

  • Satellite-venture execution risk
  • Government budget dependence

Moat: narrow (government relationships, IP/patents, installed base). Incumbent combat-system integrator on Korean Navy ships; the new satellite business is unproven.

Headquarters: Seongnam, South Korea · Employees: 4,855

Named competitors

Hanwha Systems at a glance

Size Hanwha Systems (272210.KS) is a South Korea Industrials company (Aerospace & Defense) with a market value of $6.93B, the 59th largest of 495 South Korea companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₩50,300 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 57.1%, against -14.8% for the median peer and -24.5% for the South Korea market (cap-weighted) — 2nd lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 29.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +20.6%); the operating margin is 5.8% (peer median 8.9%).

Valuation It trades at 82.5× forward earnings against a peer median of 36.4× (2nd most expensive of 18).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.3 points below its cost of capital (7.9% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 17 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

40608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 85272210.KS 42
Six months, rebased to 100: Hanwha Systems against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Hanwha Systems financials

Reported figures in KRW; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₩4.15T₩3.66T₩2.80T₩2.45T₩2.19T
Revenue growth—+31%+14%+12%—
Gross profitn/a₩1.07T₩965B₩738B₩548B
EBITDAn/a₩300B₩290B₩237B₩144B
Net income₩27.8B₩242B₩454B₩349B-₩76.6B
Free cash flown/a-₩194B-₩107B-₩48.9B₩220B
Capital expendituren/a₩321B₩273B₩159B₩80.8B
Total debtn/a₩1.61T₩473B₩330B₩209B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Hanwha Systems competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%+20%-40%-20%0%+20%LOARKTOS047810600879BETAMROHXLKRMNJOBY600372688002600562DRS079550AMTM000768MOG-A272210.KS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Hanwha Systems is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%0×50×100×LOARKTOS047810600879MROHXLKRMN600372AVAV688002600562DRS079550AMTM000768HAG272210.KSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Hanwha Systems is the large dot.

Hanwha Systems competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (272210.KS vs 079550.KS vs LDO.MI vs HO.PA)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Hanwha Systems 272210.KS$6.93B-57%+30%6%82.5×n/a
LIG Defense&Aerospace 079550.KS$5.24B-65%+26%8%20.0×n/a
Leonardo LDO.MI$31.0B-4%+10%7%20.2×14.3%
Thales HO.PA$51.1B-1%+7%11%20.6×-2.8%
L3Harris LHX$48.4B-13%+7%12%20.1×7.0%
Korea Aerospace 047810.KS$7.37B-39%+44%6%45.4×n/a

How Hanwha Systems compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Hanwha Systems against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure272210.KSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-35.2%-0.8%2nd lowest of 21
6-month return-57.1%-14.8%2nd lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-72.6%-34.3%2nd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+29.9%+20.6%7th highest of 21
Operating margin5.8%8.9%10th lowest of 21
Forward P/E82.5×36.4×2nd most expensive of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital-4.3 pp-0.6 pp5th lowest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Hanwha Systems 272210.KSSouth Korea$6.93B-57%+30%6%82.5×n/an/a
Loar LOARUnited States$7.05B+26%+30%25%52.2×29.1%+27.5%
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions KTOSUnited States$6.59B-39%+26%2%36.4×n/an/a
Korea Aerospace 047810.KSSouth Korea$7.37B-39%+44%6%45.4×n/an/a
China Aerospace Times Electronics 600879.SSChina$6.43B-46%-13%1%130.0×n/an/a
BETA Technologies BETAUnited States$6.37B+45%+136%-1,033%n/an/an/a
Melrose Industries MRO.LUnited Kingdom$7.80B-4%+9%11%13.4×15.3%-12.8%
Hexcel HXLUnited States$6.09B-16%+8%11%29.6×23.0%+4.5%
Karman KRMNUnited States$6.04B-25%+50%19%57.5×n/an/a
Joby Aviation JOBYUnited States$5.89B-45%+118,568%-754%n/an/an/a
AVIC Airborne Systems 600372.SSChina$8.36B-11%-2%5%48.1×n/an/a
AeroVironment AVAVUnited States$5.73B-33%+84%1%33.5×n/an/a
Raytron Technology 688002.SSChina$8.64B-15%+84%29%26.4×20.1%+32.1%
Glarun Technology 600562.SSChina$5.43B+6%-8%21%51.7×n/an/a
Leonardo DRS DRSUnited States$9.08B-18%+9%11%23.1×4.6%+5.6%
LIG Defense&Aerospace 079550.KSSouth Korea$5.24B-65%+26%8%20.0×n/an/a
Amentum AMTMUnited States$5.20B-13%+11%4%8.4×1.7%+23.3%
Nanchang Sanrui Intelligence Technology 301696.SZChina$4.87B-14%+29%45%n/a36.1%+43.7%
AVIC Xi'an Aircraft Industry 000768.SZChina$9.92B+1%-34%3%55.7×n/an/a
Hensoldt HAG.DEGermany$10.0B+2%+15%10%41.3×12.2%+15.3%
Moog MOG-AUnited States$10.3B+3%+16%12%27.8×15.1%+6.0%

Questions

Who are Hanwha Systems's main competitors?
Named competitors: LIG Nex1 (079550.KS), Leonardo (LDO.MI), Thales (HO.PA), L3Harris Technologies (LHX), Korea Aerospace Industries (047810.KS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Loar (LOAR), Kratos Defense & Security Solutions (KTOS), Korea Aerospace (047810.KS), China Aerospace Times Electronics (600879.SS), BETA Technologies (BETA), Melrose Industries (MRO.L).
Is Hanwha Systems expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 82.5× against a peer median of 36.4×, 2nd most expensive of 18 in its peer set.
How has Hanwha Systems stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -57.1% against -14.8% for the median peer; over one year -10.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.