Loading…

Teledyne TechnologiesTDYCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Information Technology›Aerospace & Defense

Maker of instrumentation, imaging sensors and digital imaging systems for aerospace, defense, industrial and scientific customers.

Momentum neutral 46
Mkt cap
$28.5B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
99%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$261M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
22.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-0.9 pp
WACC 9.0%
Hurdle
+1 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BBB / BBB+
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
82 days
27 Jan 2027
Close · USD$618.60
1D+4.5%
1W-6.0%
1M+2.3%
3M-10.4%
6M-0.5%
YTD+21.1%
1Y+20.7%
ATR %3.3%
Beta1.09
52w lowhigh11.3% off high

What Teledyne Technologies does

Maker of instrumentation, imaging sensors and digital imaging systems for aerospace, defense, industrial and scientific customers.

Sells specialized sensors and instruments that are designed into customers' products or programs, often for years, so sales come as component supply, project work and replacement. Growth has come heavily from acquisitions, the largest being FLIR Systems in 2021, which put thermal cameras at the center of its imaging business.

Products and services

  • Imaging sensors/cameras (incl. FLIR thermal)
  • Test & measurement instrumentation
  • Aerospace/defense electronics
  • Environmental/marine instrumentation

Customers

  • Aerospace/defense OEMs and agencies
  • Industrial/scientific research customers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Information technology
  • Instrumentation & imaging
  • Sensors, instrumentation & digital…

What could go right

  • Defense/aerospace sensor demand growth
  • Industrial/scientific instrumentation replacement cycle

What could go wrong

  • Defense/industrial capex cyclicality
  • Acquisition-integration execution risk

Moat: narrow (IP / patents, customer qualification, process know-how). Specialized sensor/imaging IP (including FLIR thermal imaging) qualified into defense and industrial programs.

Headquarters: Thousand Oaks, California, US · Founded: 1960 · Employees: 15,800

Named competitors

Teledyne Technologies at a glance

Size Teledyne Technologies (TDY) is a United States Information Technology company (Aerospace & Defense) with a market value of $28.5B, the 380th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $618.60 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 0.5%, against +0.2% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 10th lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 8.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +19.9%); the operating margin is 20.0% (peer median 7.6%).

Valuation It trades at 22.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 20.2× (10th most expensive of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 15% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +15%, so the hurdle is +1 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.9 points below its cost of capital (9.0% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $5.51B at 27 Sep 2026, up 21% on a year earlier — 0.8 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Credit Teledyne Technologies has 3 bonds outstanding ($2.04B), rated BBB by the agencies and trading like BBB+ at a weighted spread of 73 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 2.5% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 27 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 102TDY 98
Six months, rebased to 100: Teledyne Technologies against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Teledyne Technologies financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$6.52B$6.12B$5.68B$5.65B$5.47B
Revenue growth—+8%+1%+3%—
Gross profit$2.62B$2.40B$2.24B$2.26B$2.14B
EBITDA$1.65B$1.49B$1.36B$1.37B$1.32B
Net income$1.03B$895M$819M$886M$789M
Free cash flow$1.15B$1.07B$1.11B$721M$394M
Capital expenditure$133M$117M$83.7M$115M$92.6M
Total debt$2.03B$2.64B$2.79B$3.40B$4.08B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Teledyne Technologies competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%-40%-20%0%CTSHVRSNOKTAZMTWLOFLEXHPQMCHPCRWVMDBZSPONALABQNTAPIOTTERTDY6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Teledyne Technologies is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%20×40×CTSHBSPVRSNOKTAZMTWLOFLEXHPQMCHPMDBZSPALABQNTAPIOTTERTDYRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Teledyne Technologies is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+25%+50%+75%+100%0%50%100%CTSHBSPVRSNOKTAZMTWLOHPQMCHPMDBZSPONTDYGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Teledyne Technologies is the large dot.

Teledyne Technologies competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (TDY vs KEYS vs LITE vs EMR)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Teledyne Technologies TDY$28.5B0%+8%20%22.9×15.5%
Keysight Technologies KEYS$46.3B-24%+26%24%20.3×20.9%
Lumentum LITE$48.9B-40%+103%23%18.8×41.7%
Emerson Electric EMR$90.6B+15%+5%21%22.3×19.9%
Fujifilm 4901.T$24.9B+14%+7%10%14.1×n/a

How Teledyne Technologies compares with its peers

Peer set: Sector in the same market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Teledyne Technologies against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureTDYPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+2.3%-20.2%4th highest of 21
6-month return-0.5%+0.2%10th lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-11.3%-34.2%2nd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+8.4%+19.9%5th lowest of 21
Operating margin20.0%7.6%8th highest of 21
Forward P/E22.9×20.2×10th most expensive of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)15.5%20.7%7th least demanding of 18
Growth delivered (Del g)+14.8%+4.9%7th highest of 18
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+0.7 pp+10.8 pp7th least demanding of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital-0.9 pp-3.9 pp8th highest of 19
EV / EBITDA18.2×19.0×8th cheapest of 17
Net debt / EBITDA0.9×-0.0×10th most indebted of 21
Bond spread73 bp106 bptightest of 10

Peer table

Peer set: Sector in the same market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Teledyne Technologies TDYUnited States$28.5B0%+8%20%22.9×15.5%+14.8%
Cognizant CTSHUnited States$28.9B+26%+5%-1%10.5×0.8%+4.9%
Bending Spoons BSPUnited States$27.9Bn/a+95%21%25.6×45.5%+94.7%
Verisign VRSNUnited States$27.7B+7%+6%68%28.4×14.5%+5.5%
Okta OKTAUnited States$29.5B+101%+11%8%41.3×39.2%+28.4%
Zoom Communications ZMUnited States$26.2B-18%+5%24%14.7×5.8%+12.9%
Twilio TWLOUnited States$31.3B0%+19%8%30.7×38.2%+23.5%
Flex FLEXUnited States$25.8B-51%+18%6%11.2×15.9%+3.0%
HP Inc. HPQUnited States$25.7B+27%+9%7%9.5×-7.0%-0.4%
Microchip Technology MCHPUnited States$31.7B-41%+21%16%14.5×34.2%-2.8%
CoreWeave CRWVUnited States$25.6B-59%+115%-3%n/an/an/a
MongoDB MDBUnited States$25.2B+4%+25%-1%44.7×27.9%+33.1%
Zscaler ZSUnited States$32.2B+30%+25%-4%40.5×20.7%+37.9%
Everpure PUnited States$32.2B+24%+27%5%29.6×58.7%+16.8%
ON Semiconductor ONUnited States$24.6B-39%+3%19%14.3×20.0%+2.7%
Jabil JBLUnited States$24.6B-33%+21%5%13.5×8.3%+4.2%
Astera Labs ALABUnited States$33.1B-5%+115%26%28.0×n/an/a
Qnity Electronics QUnited States$24.5B-21%+18%23%20.2×22.1%0.0%
NetApp NTAPUnited States$33.2B+43%+12%26%17.0×15.2%+3.8%
Samsara IOTUnited States$24.0B+38%+30%1%48.5×n/an/a
Teradyne TERUnited States$34.1B-39%+75%33%20.2×20.9%+0.4%

Teledyne Technologies bonds and credit

Teledyne Technologies has 3 bonds outstanding with $2.04B face value. The agencies rate it BBB; its bonds trade like BBB+. Weighted yield 5.24%, a spread of 73 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Teledyne Technologies backlog

Teledyne Technologies reported $5.51B of remaining performance obligations at 27 Sep 2026, up 21% from a year earlier and up 7% from the previous quarter. That is 0.8 years of trailing revenue already under contract. Book-to-bill last quarter: 1.20.

Questions

Who are Teledyne Technologies's main competitors?
Named competitors: Keysight Technologies (KEYS), Lumentum Holdings (LITE), Emerson Electric (National Instruments) (EMR), Fujifilm (industrial imaging) (4901.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (sector in the same market, nearest in size) also includes Cognizant (CTSH), Bending Spoons (BSP), Verisign (VRSN), Okta (OKTA), Zoom Communications (ZM), Twilio (TWLO).
Is Teledyne Technologies expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 22.9× against a peer median of 20.2×, 10th most expensive of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 15% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +15%, so the hurdle is +1 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Teledyne Technologies stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -0.5% against +0.2% for the median peer; over one year +20.7%.
What is Teledyne Technologies's backlog?
Teledyne Technologies's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $5.51B at 27 Sep 2026, +21% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.