Loading…

NTNXNTNXCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Information Technology›Data Processing Services

US software company selling hyperconverged infrastructure and hybrid-cloud software that runs on standard servers.

Momentum neutral 50
Mkt cap
$15.9B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
96%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$163M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
25.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
n/a
WACC 8.2%
Hurdle
+8 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
26 days
2 Dec 2026
Close · USD$58.37
1D-0.3%
1W-13.2%
1M-20.2%
3M-9.4%
6M+26.9%
YTD+12.9%
1Y-16.3%
ATR %4.4%
Beta0.93
52w lowhigh23.2% off high

What NTNX does

US software company selling hyperconverged infrastructure and hybrid-cloud software that runs on standard servers.

Sells term subscriptions to its software rather than permanent licenses, so revenue builds from renewals on its installed base. It stopped selling its own hardware years ago and runs on servers from partners such as Dell and HPE.

Products and services

  • Nutanix Cloud Platform (HCI software)
  • Cloud, database and desktop add-on services

Customers

  • Enterprises consolidating data-center virtualizati

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Software
  • Cloud/data-center infrastructure…
  • Hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI)…

What could go right

  • VMware customers migrating after Broadcom pricing changes
  • Hybrid-cloud consolidation demand

What could go wrong

  • Hyperscaler public-cloud migration reduces on-prem need
  • Intense competition from Broadcom/VMware and Microsoft

Moat: narrow (switching costs, installed base). Once deployed as the virtualization layer, replacing it across an enterprise's infrastructure is costly and risky.

Headquarters: San Jose, California, US · Founded: 2009 · Employees: 8,350

Named competitors

NTNX at a glance

Size NTNX (NTNX) is a United States Information Technology company (Data Processing Services) with a market value of $15.9B, the 574th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $58.37 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 26.9%, against +0.1% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 5th highest of 16 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 12.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +14.7%); the operating margin is 10.8% (peer median 14.0%).

Valuation It trades at 25.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 20.3× (5th most expensive of 11).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 23% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +15%, so the hurdle is +8 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Credit NTNX has 2 bonds outstanding ($1.36B).

Short interest Short interest is 4.2% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 2 Dec 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026NTNX 129Peer median 93
Six months, rebased to 100: NTNX against the median of its 15 peers (local-currency closes).

NTNX financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2026-07-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023
Revenue$2.85B$2.85B$2.54B$2.15B$1.86B
Revenue growth—+12%+18%+15%—
Gross profit$2.48B$2.48B$2.20B$1.82B$1.53B
EBITDA$379M$387M$262M$129M-$78.9M
Net income$1.51B$1.51B$188M-$125M-$255M
Free cash flow$841M$841M$750M$598M$207M
Capital expenditure$76.0M$76.0M$71.3M$75.3M$65.4M
Total debt$1.52B$1.52B$1.49B$695M$1.33B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

NTNX competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%-40%-20%0%+20%TYL300442GDDYLTMAKAM6669SWICHEXLSHUT300017WULFIOSNXTAPLD9698NTNX6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. NTNX is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%20×40×TYL300442GDDYLTMAKAM6669EXLS300017IOS9698NTNXRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. NTNX is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+10%+20%+30%0%10%20%30%TYLGDDYLTMAKAMEXLS300017IOSNTNXGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. NTNX is the large dot.

NTNX competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (NTNX vs AVGO vs MSFT vs DELL)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
NTNX NTNX$15.9B+27%+12%11%25.0×23.0%
Broadcom AVGO$1.40T-32%+49%49%16.9×26.6%
Microsoft MSFT$3.94T+28%+18%47%25.5×17.2%
Dell Technologies DELL$209B+26%+49%10%11.6×10.1%

How NTNX compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

NTNX against its 15 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureNTNXPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-20.2%-0.1%4th lowest of 16
6-month return+26.9%+0.1%5th highest of 16
Distance from 52-week high-23.2%-33.6%6th highest of 16
Revenue growth (TTM)+12.4%+14.7%7th lowest of 16
Operating margin10.8%14.0%7th lowest of 16
Forward P/E25.0×20.3×5th most expensive of 11
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)23.0%17.0%3rd most demanding of 8
Growth delivered (Del g)+15.4%+8.4%4th highest of 8
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+7.6 pp+5.0 pp3rd most demanding of 8
EV / EBITDA39.8×14.4×2nd most expensive of 10
Net debt / EBITDA-2.2×1.9×least indebted of 10

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
NTNX NTNXUnited States$15.9B+27%+12%11%25.0×23.0%+15.4%
Tyler Technologies TYLUnited States$16.7B+30%+8%16%28.1×22.9%+15.9%
Range Intelligent Computing Technology 300442.SZChina$14.1B-35%+51%36%34.4×n/an/a
GoDaddy GDDYUnited States$13.9B+26%+7%26%12.9×-2.2%+8.4%
LTM LTM.NSIndia$13.6B+2%+15%16%21.6×23.8%+27.9%
Akamai Technologies AKAMUnited States$11.9B-44%+6%12%12.8×17.0%+5.6%
Wiwynn 6669.TWTaiwan$26.3B+101%+84%7%9.6×n/an/a
SWI Capital SWICH.ASNetherlands$6.61B+88%-33%-54%n/an/an/a
ExlService EXLSUnited States$6.51B+39%+16%14%17.0×9.4%+16.8%
Hut 8 HUTUnited States$6.49B-47%+71%-89%n/an/an/a
Wangsu Science & Technology 300017.SZChina$5.90B0%0%15%49.1×27.3%-3.9%
TeraWulf WULFUnited States$5.67B-51%+15%-227%n/an/an/a
IONOS IOS.DEGermany$5.49B+23%-34%23%19.1×11.0%+5.9%
Nextdc NXT.AXAustralia$5.47B-30%+16%-7%n/an/an/a
Applied Digital APLDUnited States$4.70B-62%+290%-24%n/an/an/a
GDS 9698.HKHong Kong$4.22B-52%+13%17%36.8×n/an/a

NTNX bonds and credit

NTNX has 2 bonds outstanding with $1.36B face value.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are NTNX's main competitors?
Named competitors: VMware (Broadcom) (AVGO), Microsoft (MSFT), Dell Technologies (DELL). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Tyler Technologies (TYL), Range Intelligent Computing Technology (300442.SZ), GoDaddy (GDDY), LTM (LTM.NS), Akamai Technologies (AKAM), Wiwynn (6669.TW).
Is NTNX expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 25.0× against a peer median of 20.3×, 5th most expensive of 11 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 23% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +15%, so the hurdle is +8 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has NTNX stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +26.9% against +0.1% for the median peer; over one year -16.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.