Loading…

TeraWulf Inc.WULFCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Information Technology›Data Processing Services

Bitcoin miner running low-carbon, mostly nuclear/hydro-powered data centers, expanding into AI/HPC hosting.

Momentum laggard 10
Mkt cap
$5.67B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
70%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$644M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-24.2 pp
WACC 12.9%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · USD$11.37
1D+12.8%
1W-3.1%
1M-16.7%
3M-29.8%
6M-51.4%
YTD-1.0%
1Y-26.0%
ATR %11.3%
Beta3.62
52w lowhigh61.9% off high

What TeraWulf does

Bitcoin miner running low-carbon, mostly nuclear/hydro-powered data centers, expanding into AI/HPC hosting.

Earns bitcoin by running computers that compete to validate the network's transactions, in return for newly issued coins and fees, then sells or holds the coins, so income moves with the bitcoin price and the network's difficulty. A newer line, leasing data-centre space and power to AI computing firms on long contracts, would add fixed income that does not move with bitcoin.

Products and services

  • Bitcoin mining
  • HPC/AI hosting infrastructure (emerging)

Customers

  • Institutional bitcoin holders
  • AI/cloud compute tenants (emerging)

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Digital infrastructure
  • Bitcoin mining/data centers
  • Compute infrastructure (crypto + AI)

What could go right

  • Bitcoin price appreciation
  • AI hosting contract wins

What could go wrong

  • Bitcoin price volatility
  • Power cost/grid constraints

Moat: none (scale, installed base). Low-cost, low-carbon power sites are an edge, but mining economics remain commodity-driven.

Headquarters: Easton, Maryland, US · Founded: 2021 · Employees: 141

Named competitors

TeraWulf at a glance

Size TeraWulf (WULF) is a United States Information Technology company (Data Processing Services) with a market value of $5.67B, the 1102nd largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $11.37 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 51.4%, against -21.3% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 19 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 14.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.8%); the operating margin is -227.3% (peer median 3.4%).

Valuation It trades at 49.3× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 6.1× (2nd most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 24.2 points below its cost of capital (12.9% WACC).

Credit TeraWulf has 3 bonds outstanding ($2.52B).

Relative performance

507510012511 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 79WULF 49
Six months, rebased to 100: TeraWulf against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

TeraWulf financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$165M$168M$140M$69.2M$15.0M
Revenue growth—+20%+102%+361%—
Gross profit$10.5M-$2.81M$17.6M$13.6M-$2.72M
EBITDA-$265M-$75.8M$589,000$1.01M-$35.1M
Net income-$1.95B-$661M-$72.4M-$73.4M-$90.8M
Free cash flow-$2.50B-$1.18B-$292M-$70.9M-$95.2M
Capital expenditure$2.23B$1.06B$268M$75.2M$61.1M
Total debt$5.24B$5.20B$491M$124M$129M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

TeraWulf competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%-50%0%IOSNXT300017HUTEXLSSWICHAPLD9698JOYY4812KDCIFRMP1TGS300383AKAM1686WULF6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. TeraWulf is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-25%0%+25%+50%+75%0×20×40×IOSNXT300017HUTEXLSSWICHAPLD9698JOYYKDCIFRMP1TGS300383IOND38961686WULFRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. TeraWulf is the large dot.

TeraWulf competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (WULF vs HUT vs APLD vs CIFR)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq g
TeraWulf WULF$5.67B-51%+15%-227%49.3×n/a
Hut 8 HUT$6.49B-47%+71%-89%26.1×n/a
Applied Digital APLD$4.70B-62%+290%-24%11.8×n/a
Cipher Digital CIFR$2.99B-68%-29%-172%42.6×n/a
MARA MARA$2.45B-51%+1%-123%n/an/a

How TeraWulf compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

TeraWulf against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureWULFPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-16.7%-8.4%8th lowest of 21
6-month return-51.4%-21.3%4th lowest of 19
Distance from 52-week high-61.9%-38.5%4th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+14.7%+6.8%7th highest of 21
Operating margin-227.3%3.4%lowest of 21
EV / Sales49.3×6.1×2nd most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-24.2 pp-6.6 pplowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
TeraWulf WULFUnited States$5.67B-51%+15%-227%49.3×n/an/a
IONOS IOS.DEGermany$5.49B+23%-34%23%5.0×11.0%+5.9%
Nextdc NXT.AXAustralia$5.47B-30%+16%-7%20.9×n/an/a
Wangsu Science & Technology 300017.SZChina$5.90B0%0%15%6.8×27.3%-3.9%
Hut 8 HUTUnited States$6.49B-47%+71%-89%26.1×n/an/a
ExlService EXLSUnited States$6.51B+39%+16%14%2.9×9.4%+16.8%
SWI Capital SWICH.ASNetherlands$6.61B+88%-33%-54%110.6×n/an/a
Applied Digital APLDUnited States$4.70B-62%+290%-24%11.8×n/an/a
GDS 9698.HKHong Kong$4.22B-52%+13%17%5.5×n/an/a
JOYY, Inc. Sponsored ADR JOYYUnited States$3.98B+37%+8%2%1.2×19.8%+2.1%
Dentsu Soken 4812.TJapan$3.56B+31%+10%14%2.8×0.3%+8.7%
Kyndryl Holdings Incorporation KDUnited States$3.55B+33%-1%4%0.4×1.6%-4.9%
Cipher Digital CIFRUnited States$2.99B-68%-29%-172%42.6×n/an/a
Megaport MP1.AXAustralia$2.80B+86%+37%-10%11.9×n/an/a
Tgs TGS.OLNorway$2.73B-13%-30%12%2.4×5.5%+36.2%
Beijing Sinnet Technology 300383.SZChina$2.70B-37%-2%-11%3.3×46.5%-0.7%
Akamai Technologies AKAMUnited States$11.9B-44%+6%12%4.2×17.0%+5.6%
Ionic Digital IONDUnited States$2.68Bn/a-8%-44%18.5×n/an/a
Kingsoft Cloud 3896.HKHong Kong$2.54B-47%+35%-3%1.8×n/an/a
Sunevision 1686.HKHong Kong$2.46B-29%+6%52%11.2×10.9%+10.7%
Csquare CSQRUnited States$2.39Bn/a+9%10%7.9×n/an/a

TeraWulf bonds and credit

TeraWulf has 3 bonds outstanding with $2.52B face value.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are TeraWulf's main competitors?
Named competitors: Hut 8 (HUT), Applied Digital (APLD), Cipher Mining (CIFR), MARA Holdings (MARA). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes IONOS (IOS.DE), Nextdc (NXT.AX), Wangsu Science & Technology (300017.SZ), Hut 8 (HUT), ExlService (EXLS), SWI Capital (SWICH.AS).
Is TeraWulf expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 49.3× against a peer median of 6.1×, 2nd most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has TeraWulf stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -51.4% against -21.3% for the median peer; over one year -26.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.