Loading…

Nokia OyjNOKIA.HECompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Finland · EUR·Information Technology›Telecommunications Equipment

Finnish telecom equipment maker selling mobile network gear, fixed broadband and optical networking to telecom operators worldwide.

≈ Finland's Cisco/Ericsson peer.Momentum laggard 4
Mkt cap
$44.3B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
90%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$147M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
19.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-1.8 pp
WACC 12.9%
Hurdle
+19 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BBB- / BBB-
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
83 days
28 Jan 2027
Close · EUR€6.98
1D+2.0%
1W-9.9%
1M-23.2%
3M-15.1%
6M-37.0%
YTD+25.3%
1Y+17.3%
ATR %6.2%
52w lowhigh53.4% off high

What Nokia does

Finnish telecom equipment maker selling mobile network gear, fixed broadband and optical networking to telecom operators worldwide.

Sells network equipment to phone operators on projects timed to their spending plans, so sales swing with carrier budgets, while patent licence fees from device makers arrive steadily under multi-year agreements. Since selling its handset business to Microsoft in 2014 it has been purely a network and technology company; the 2025 purchase of Infinera added optical networking.

In one line: Finland's Cisco/Ericsson peer..

Products and services

  • Mobile networks (RAN/5G equipment)
  • Network infrastructure (IP/optical)
  • Cloud & network services
  • Technology licensing (patents)

Customers

  • Telecom network operators
  • Enterprise/private network customers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Telecommunications equipment
  • Network infrastructure
  • Mobile & fixed network gear

What could go right

  • 5G network upgrade cycles
  • Patent licensing income

What could go wrong

  • Competition from Huawei/Ericsson pricing
  • Slower telecom capex cycles

Moat: narrow (IP / patents, switching costs, installed base). Deep patent portfolio (licensing income) plus embedded, hard-to-swap network infrastructure at major carriers.

Headquarters: Espoo, Finland · Founded: 1865

Named competitors

Nokia at a glance

Size Nokia (NOKIA.HE) is a Finland Information Technology company (Telecommunications Equipment) with a market value of $44.3B, the 2nd largest of 65 Finland companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at €6.98 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 37.0%, against -12.6% for the median peer and -2.9% for the Finland market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 14 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 4.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +14.0%); the operating margin is 13.6% (peer median 5.3%).

Valuation It trades at 19.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 17.5× (7th most expensive of 14).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 17% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -2%, so the hurdle is +19 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.8 points below its cost of capital (12.9% WACC).

Credit Nokia has 2 bonds outstanding ($1.11B), rated BBB- by the agencies and trading like BBB- at a weighted spread of 124 bp.

Next results Next results expected around 28 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 82NOKIA.HE 59
Six months, rebased to 100: Nokia against the median of its 13 peers (local-currency closes).

Nokia financials

Reported figures in EUR; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue€20.6B€19.9B€19.2B€21.1B€24.9B
Revenue growth—+3%-9%-15%—
Gross profit€9.18B€8.81B€9.02B€8.70B€10.4B
EBITDA€3.70B€2.77B€3.41B€2.86B€3.97B
Net income€772M€629M€1.25B€665M€4.25B
Free cash flow€5.00M€1.47B€2.02B€665M€873M
Capital expenditure€624M€606M€472M€652M€601M
Total debt€3.37B€4.41B€4.75B€5.19B€5.52B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Nokia competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%-25%0%+25%002415UIERIC-ACIENMSI234518100763000063601138000100603296688036NOKIA.HE6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Nokia is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%+60%+80%20×30×002415UIERIC-ACIENMSI234518100763000063601138000100603296688036NOKIA.HERevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Nokia is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%0%20%002415UIERIC-ACIENMSI234518100763000100NOKIA.HEGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Nokia is the large dot.

Nokia competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (NOKIA.HE vs CSCO vs 000063.SZ vs CIEN)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Nokia NOKIA.HE$44.3B-37%+4%14%19.2×17.4%
Cisco CSCO$369B-3%+12%25%18.4×15.0%
ZTE 000063.SZ$19.0B-23%+14%1%24.2×19.0%
Ciena CIEN$34.5B-56%+33%14%23.4×29.0%
Arista Networks ANET$215B+20%+41%44%30.4×29.8%
ADTRAN ADTN$329M-73%+10%0%12.9×n/a
Calix CALX$1.89B-29%+23%5%13.9×23.1%

How Nokia compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Nokia against its 13 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureNOKIA.HEPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-23.2%-3.8%4th lowest of 14
6-month return-37.0%-12.6%3rd lowest of 14
Distance from 52-week high-53.4%-32.6%3rd lowest of 14
Revenue growth (TTM)+4.2%+14.0%3rd lowest of 14
Operating margin13.6%5.3%7th highest of 14
Forward P/E19.2×17.5×7th most expensive of 14
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)17.4%16.9%6th least demanding of 11
Growth delivered (Del g)-1.9%+8.7%lowest of 11
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+19.2 pp+8.7 pp2nd most demanding of 11
ROIC minus cost of capital-1.8 pp+7.1 pp4th lowest of 14
EV / EBITDA10.4×25.0×2nd cheapest of 7
Net debt / EBITDA-0.3×-0.4×4th least indebted of 7
Bond spread124 bp95 bpwidest of 4

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Nokia NOKIA.HEFinland$44.3B-37%+4%14%19.2×17.4%-1.9%
Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology 002415.SZChina$49.1B-3%+8%19%17.5×2.6%+7.8%
Ubiquiti UIUnited States$35.9B-30%+27%36%33.5×22.2%+11.5%
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson ERIC-A.STSweden$34.9B-9%-4%14%17.3×-8.7%+0.4%
Ciena CIENUnited States$34.5B-56%+33%14%23.4×29.0%+6.2%
Motorola Solutions MSIUnited States$85.1B+34%+10%25%27.0×16.4%+9.5%
Accton Technology 2345.TWTaiwan$21.6B-49%+82%14%12.5×4.5%+35.4%
Xiaomi-w 1810.HKHong Kong$99.0B-2%+6%3%27.8×24.3%+12.4%
ZTE 0763.HKHong Kong$19.0B-27%+20%1%14.6×17.5%+4.9%
ZTE 000063.SZChina$19.0B-23%+14%1%24.2×19.0%+5.6%
Foxconn Industrial Internet 601138.SSChina$120B-35%+60%5%13.1×n/an/a
TCL Technology 000100.SZChina$15.0B+7%+5%0%13.1×-4.7%+19.1%
Huaqin 603296.SSChina$12.7B-13%+28%2%17.1×n/an/a
Shenzhen Transsion 688036.SSChina$11.6B+13%-1%5%21.8×n/an/a

Nokia bonds and credit

Nokia has 2 bonds outstanding with $1.11B face value. The agencies rate it BBB-; its bonds trade like BBB-. Weighted yield 4.29%, a spread of 124 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Nokia's main competitors?
Named competitors: Ericsson (private or unlisted), Cisco Systems (CSCO), ZTE (000063.SZ), Huawei (private or unlisted), Ciena (CIEN), Arista Networks (ANET). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology (002415.SZ), Ubiquiti (UI), Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (ERIC-A.ST), Ciena (CIEN), Motorola Solutions (MSI), Accton Technology (2345.TW).
Is Nokia expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 19.2× against a peer median of 17.5×, 7th most expensive of 14 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 17% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -2%, so the hurdle is +19 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Nokia stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -37.0% against -12.6% for the median peer; over one year +17.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.