Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › ERIC-A.ST Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson Class AERIC-A.STCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Sweden · SEK·Information Technology›Telecommunications Equipment

Swedish maker of telecom network equipment (5G radio, core networks) sold to mobile carriers worldwide.

≈ A Swedish Cisco/Nokia peer for mobile networksMomentum neutral 47
Mkt cap
$34.9B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
21%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$353,265
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
17.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+20.9 pp
WACC 6.0%
Hurdle
-9 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BBB- / BBB-
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
77 days
22 Jan 2027
Close · SEKSEK 104.20
1D-0.8%
1W-5.3%
1M+8.9%
3M+6.4%
6M-9.1%
YTD+15.1%
1Y+9.6%
ATR %2.8%
52w lowhigh19.0% off high

What Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson does

Swedish maker of telecom network equipment (5G radio, core networks) sold to mobile carriers worldwide.

Sells radio equipment and software to mobile operators in large rollouts, so sales swing with carrier budgets, while patent licence fees from phone makers arrive steadily under long agreements. North America is its largest region. The 2022 purchase of Vonage, a cloud-communications firm, moved it into software sold to companies, though it later wrote down much of that value.

In one line: A Swedish Cisco/Nokia peer for mobile networks.

Products and services

  • 5G radio access network equipment
  • Core network software
  • Enterprise/private networks
  • Network services

Customers

  • Verizon
  • AT&T
  • T-Mobile
  • Global mobile carriers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Telecommunications equipment
  • Network infrastructure
  • Radio access networks, core networks…

What could go right

  • 5G network buildout/upgrades
  • Patent licensing revenue

What could go wrong

  • Carrier capex cyclicality
  • Huawei/Chinese vendor price competition

Moat: narrow (IP / patents, switching costs, installed base). Deep 5G patent portfolio and carrier network lock-in, though Nokia/Huawei/Samsung compete closely.

Headquarters: Stockholm, Sweden · Founded: 1876 · Employees: 88,826

Named competitors

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson at a glance

Size Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (ERIC-A.ST) is a Sweden Information Technology company (Telecommunications Equipment) with a market value of $34.9B, the 9th largest of 221 Sweden companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at SEK 104.20 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 9.1%, against -23.2% for the median peer and +8.2% for the Sweden market (cap-weighted) — 7th highest of 16 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 4.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +10.3%); the operating margin is 14.4% (peer median 4.8%).

Valuation It trades at 17.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 20.5× (6th cheapest of 15).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is 0%, so the hurdle is -9 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 20.9 points above its cost of capital (6.0% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was SEK 123B at 31 Dec 2025, down 9% on a year earlier — 0.5 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Credit Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson has 4 bonds outstanding ($2.51B), rated BBB- by the agencies and trading like BBB- at a weighted spread of 111 bp.

Next results Next results expected around 22 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026ERIC-A.ST 88Peer median 80
Six months, rebased to 100: Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson against the median of its 15 peers (local-currency closes).

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson financials

Reported figures in SEK; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueSEK 231BSEK 237BSEK 248BSEK 263BSEK 272B
Revenue growth—-5%-6%-3%—
Gross profitSEK 111BSEK 114BSEK 111BSEK 104BSEK 113B
EBITDASEK 39.9BSEK 41.7BSEK 19.0BSEK 28.0BSEK 39.2B
Net incomeSEK 19.3BSEK 28.4BSEK 20.0M-SEK 26.4BSEK 18.7B
Free cash flowSEK 29.4BSEK 30.3BSEK 43.9BSEK 3.88BSEK 26.4B
Capital expenditureSEK 4.36BSEK 3.77BSEK 3.64BSEK 5.47BSEK 6.20B
Total debtSEK 45.3BSEK 40.3BSEK 45.5BSEK 54.3BSEK 42.2B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%-25%0%+25%CIENUINOKIA00241523450763000063000100MSI6032961810688036601138600118VSATERIC-A.ST6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%+60%+80%0×200×400×CIENUINOKIA00241523450763688036601138600118ERIC-A.STRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%CIENUINOKIA00241523450763000063000100MSI1810VSATERIC-A.STGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson is the large dot.

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (ERIC-A.ST vs NOKIA.HE vs 005930.KS vs CSCO)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson ERIC-A.ST$34.9B-9%-4%14%17.3×-8.7%
Nokia NOKIA.HE$44.3B-37%+4%14%19.2×17.4%
SamsungElec 005930.KS$886B-14%+88%46%4.0×-7.2%
Cisco CSCO$369B-3%+12%25%18.4×15.0%

How Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson against its 15 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureERIC-A.STPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+8.9%-5.1%4th highest of 16
6-month return-9.1%-23.2%7th highest of 16
Distance from 52-week high-19.0%-46.1%4th highest of 16
Revenue growth (TTM)-4.0%+10.3%lowest of 16
Operating margin14.4%4.8%4th highest of 16
Forward P/E17.3×20.5×6th cheapest of 15
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-8.7%17.5%least demanding of 12
Growth delivered (Del g)+0.4%+9.5%2nd lowest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-9.0 pp+11.8 pp3rd least demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital+20.9 pp+1.5 pp3rd highest of 16
EV / EBITDA8.3×24.5×cheapest of 8
Net debt / EBITDA-0.3×-0.3×4th most indebted of 8
Bond spread111 bp109 bp3rd tightest of 5

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson ERIC-A.STSweden$34.9B-9%-4%14%17.3×-8.7%+0.4%
Ciena CIENUnited States$34.5B-56%+33%14%23.4×29.0%+6.2%
Ubiquiti UIUnited States$35.9B-30%+27%36%33.5×22.2%+11.5%
Nokia NOKIA.HEFinland$44.3B-37%+4%14%19.2×17.4%-1.9%
Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology 002415.SZChina$49.1B-3%+8%19%17.5×2.6%+7.8%
Accton Technology 2345.TWTaiwan$21.6B-49%+82%14%12.5×4.5%+35.4%
ZTE 0763.HKHong Kong$19.0B-27%+20%1%14.6×17.5%+4.9%
ZTE 000063.SZChina$19.0B-23%+14%1%24.2×19.0%+5.6%
TCL Technology 000100.SZChina$15.0B+7%+5%0%13.1×-4.7%+19.1%
Motorola Solutions MSIUnited States$85.1B+34%+10%25%27.0×16.4%+9.5%
Huaqin 603296.SSChina$12.7B-13%+28%2%17.1×n/an/a
Xiaomi-w 1810.HKHong Kong$99.0B-2%+6%3%27.8×24.3%+12.4%
Shenzhen Transsion 688036.SSChina$11.6B+13%-1%5%21.8×n/an/a
Foxconn Industrial Internet 601138.SSChina$120B-35%+60%5%13.1×n/an/a
China Spacesat 600118.SSChina$9.75B-46%+6%1%531.4×n/an/a
ViaSat VSATUnited States$8.81B-9%+1%2%n/a42.8%+15.5%

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson bonds and credit

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson has 4 bonds outstanding with $2.51B face value. The agencies rate it BBB-; its bonds trade like BBB-. Weighted yield 4.10%, a spread of 111 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson backlog

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson reported SEK 123B of remaining performance obligations at 31 Dec 2025, down 9% from a year earlier. That is 0.5 years of trailing revenue already under contract.

Questions

Who are Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson's main competitors?
Named competitors: Nokia (NOKIA.HE), Huawei (private or unlisted), Samsung Electronics (005930.KS), Cisco Systems (CSCO). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Ciena (CIEN), Ubiquiti (UI), Nokia (NOKIA.HE), Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology (002415.SZ), Accton Technology (2345.TW), ZTE (0763.HK).
Is Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 17.3× against a peer median of 20.5×, 6th cheapest of 15 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is 0%, so the hurdle is -9 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -9.1% against -23.2% for the median peer; over one year +9.6%.
What is Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson's backlog?
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were SEK 123B at 31 Dec 2025, -9% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.