Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › MIM.SI Mi Material Holding Pte Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Mi Material Holding Pte Ltd.MIM.SICompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Singapore · SGD·Industrials›Other Metals/Minerals
Mkt cap
$454M
US dollars, full cap
$/day
$5.45M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
+5.1 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · SGDS$1.17
1D-11.4%
1W-22.5%
1Mn/a
3Mn/a
6Mn/a
YTDn/a
1Yn/a

What Mi Material Holding Pte does

Employees: 326

Mi Material Holding Pte at a glance

Size Mi Material Holding Pte (MIM.SI) is a Singapore Industrials company (Other Metals/Minerals) with a market value of $454M, the 113th largest of 186 Singapore companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at S$1.17 on 6 Nov 2026.

Growth The operating margin is 21.7% (peer median 13.5%).

Valuation It trades at 6.9× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.8× (most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 5.1 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Mi Material Holding Pte financials

Reported figures in SGD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025
Revenuen/aS$85.4M
Revenue growth——
Gross profitn/aS$28.9M
EBITDAn/aS$22.3M
Net incomen/aS$13.1M
Free cash flown/a-S$5.12M
Capital expendituren/aS$4.12M
Total debtn/aS$24.0M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Mi Material Holding Pte competitors and peer comparison

How Mi Material Holding Pte compares with its peers

Peer set: Sector in the same market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Mi Material Holding Pte against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureMIM.SIPeer medianRank in peer set
Operating margin21.7%13.5%8th highest of 21
EV / Sales6.9×1.8×most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital+5.1 pp+4.7 pp10th highest of 20
EV / EBITDA26.5×7.2×most expensive of 19
Net debt / EBITDA0.5×-0.2×6th most indebted of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Sector in the same market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Mi Material Holding Pte MIM.SISingapore$454Mn/an/a22%6.9×n/an/a
China Everbright Water U9E.SISingapore$462M-13%-33%34%4.9×-1.4%-1.7%
Wee Hur E3B.SISingapore$425M-18%+22%26%2.1×-14.2%+9.2%
HRnetGroup CHZ.SISingapore$519M-9%+1%7%0.6×-13.1%+6.2%
Nanofilm Technologies International MZH.SISingapore$383M-52%+10%8%2.1×5.6%+2.3%
Singapore Post S08.SISingapore$546M-17%-73%3%1.9×n/an/a
Samudera Shipping Line S56.SISingapore$365M-16%+4%11%0.6×-15.6%+10.5%
Civmec P9D.SISingapore$570M-1%+19%9%1.0×n/an/a
Sunpower 5GD.SISingapore$360M+11%0%22%1.7×-12.8%+17.8%
COSCO Shipping International Singapore F83.SISingapore$347M-18%+10%7%1.9×17.2%+0.9%
SIIC Environment BHK.SISingapore$327M-10%-8%23%3.9×n/an/a
Marco Polo Marine 5LY.SISingapore$322M-36%+26%32%2.7×-5.4%+31.8%
Boustead Singapore F9D.SISingapore$662M-35%+18%12%0.9×-11.4%-1.9%
Penguin International BTM.SISingapore$297M+35%-5%19%1.5×n/an/a
Ever Glory United ZKX.SISingapore$267M-17%+155%13%1.9×-6.1%+47.9%
OKP 5CF.SISingapore$257M-26%+10%25%0.7×n/an/a
Soilbuild Construction ZQM.SISingapore$257M-46%+19%14%0.3×n/an/a
China Aviation Oil (Singapore) G92.SISingapore$815M-39%-8%0%0.0×-11.7%+8.2%
Riverstone AP4.SISingapore$824M-13%-4%25%2.9×2.1%-12.8%
Micro-Mechanics (Holdings) 5DD.SISingapore$238M-31%+26%35%3.3×-11.2%+0.5%
SBS Transit S61.SISingapore$866M-2%+2%4%0.5×-10.6%+4.3%

Questions

Which companies are Mi Material Holding Pte's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: China Everbright Water (U9E.SI), Wee Hur (E3B.SI), HRnetGroup (CHZ.SI), Nanofilm Technologies International (MZH.SI), Singapore Post (S08.SI), Samudera Shipping Line (S56.SI), Civmec (P9D.SI), Sunpower (5GD.SI).
Is Mi Material Holding Pte expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 6.9× against a peer median of 1.8×, most expensive of 21 in its peer set.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.