Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › MZH.SI Nanofilm Technologies International Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Nanofilm Technologies International Ltd.MZH.SICompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Singapore · SGD·Industrials›Miscellaneous Commercial Services
Momentum laggard 5
Mkt cap
$383M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
42%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$3.34M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
24.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-1.7 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
+3 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
111 days
25 Feb 2027
Close · SGDS$0.75
1D-1.3%
1W-7.4%
1M-9.6%
3M-35.3%
6M-51.6%
YTD+28.2%
1Y+10.3%
ATR %4.9%
52w lowhigh55.4% off high

What Nanofilm Technologies International does

Employees: 2,802

Nanofilm Technologies International at a glance

Size Nanofilm Technologies International (MZH.SI) is a Singapore Industrials company (Miscellaneous Commercial Services) with a market value of $383M, the 123rd largest of 186 Singapore companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at S$0.75 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 51.6%, against -10.0% for the median peer and -1.2% for the Singapore market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 9.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.9%); the operating margin is 8.2% (peer median 5.2%).

Valuation It trades at 24.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.8× (5th most expensive of 15).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +2%, so the hurdle is +3 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.7 points below its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 25 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 93MZH.SI 48
Six months, rebased to 100: Nanofilm Technologies International against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Nanofilm Technologies International financials

Reported figures in SGD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueS$251MS$245MS$204MS$177MS$237M
Revenue growth—+20%+15%-25%—
Gross profitS$97.3MS$80.1MS$67.3MS$57.6MS$104M
EBITDAS$66.8MS$60.2MS$44.0MS$32.9MS$70.6M
Net incomeS$14.5MS$11.8MS$7.74MS$3.13MS$43.8M
Free cash flowS$26.7MS$1.76M-S$13.7M-S$10.0MS$21.6M
Capital expenditureS$58.0MS$63.1MS$50.1MS$63.3MS$62.1M
Total debtn/aS$108MS$106MS$106MS$46.6M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Nanofilm Technologies International competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-20%0%+20%PPHCKBLTCS358766271272002659CGS6937002663ACRRTNINDIABRNLOBL301107HSP603828301257277AMZH.SI6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Nanofilm Technologies International is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%+60%+80%50×100×PPHCKBLTCS35876627002659CGS6937BRNLOBLHSP301257FRPMZH.SIRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Nanofilm Technologies International is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%+30%0%20%PPHCKBLTCS3587002659CGS6937002663BRNL301107HSPFRP277AMZH.SIGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Nanofilm Technologies International is the large dot.

Nanofilm Technologies International competitors and peer comparison

How Nanofilm Technologies International compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Nanofilm Technologies International against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureMZH.SIPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-9.6%-2.9%8th lowest of 21
6-month return-51.6%-10.0%lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-55.4%-28.8%3rd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+9.8%+6.9%10th highest of 21
Operating margin8.2%5.2%8th highest of 20
Forward P/E24.2×16.8×5th most expensive of 15
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)5.6%9.2%7th least demanding of 14
Growth delivered (Del g)+2.3%+11.6%3rd lowest of 14
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+3.3 pp-3.6 pp6th most demanding of 14
ROIC minus cost of capital-1.7 pp-3.3 pp10th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA8.0×10.1×6th cheapest of 11
Net debt / EBITDA0.2×-0.4×7th most indebted of 14

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Nanofilm Technologies International MZH.SISingapore$383M-52%+10%8%24.2×5.6%+2.3%
Public Policy PPHC.LUnited Kingdom$383M-12%+43%-3%9.0×1.4%+19.6%
K-Bro Linen KBL.TOCanada$384M+5%+47%8%16.9×3.4%+20.9%
TECSYS TCS.TOCanada$381M+2%+10%5%41.3×18.4%+8.9%
Materials Analysis Technology 3587.TWOTaiwan$380M-48%+14%14%13.1×-0.3%+12.6%
Tera Probe 6627.TJapan$386M+37%+34%24%9.5×n/an/a
Datang Environment Industry 1272.HKHong Kong$388M-18%-3%13%n/an/an/a
Beijing Kaiwen Education Technology 002659.SZChina$376M-22%+7%8%119.7×15.8%+1.5%
Cogstate CGS.AXAustralia$394M+33%+7%20%26.7×10.9%+14.6%
Skytech 6937.TWTaiwan$394M-43%+1%13%34.8×21.0%+7.3%
Pubang Landscape Architecture 002663.SZChina$395M-31%-19%-21%n/a15.5%-6.0%
Axactor ACR.OLNorway$370M-20%-146%n/an/an/an/a
RattanIndia Enterprises RTNINDIA.NSIndia$368M-37%+2%1%n/an/an/a
Brunel International BRNL.ASNetherlands$399M-8%-6%2%16.3×1.6%+6.4%
Omni Bridgeway OBL.AXAustralia$367M+8%+75%-15%9.7×n/an/a
Chongqing Yuxin Pingrui Electronic 301107.SZChina$401M-7%+6%3%n/a26.5%+11.6%
Hargreaves Services HSP.LUnited Kingdom$363M+8%+33%4%18.0×9.2%+11.4%
Suzhou Kelida Building & Decoration 603828.SSChina$404M-3%-52%-26%n/an/an/a
SMO ClinPlus 301257.SZChina$405M-35%0%3%21.6×n/an/a
FRP Advisory FRP.LUnited Kingdom$405M+6%+16%20%9.8×-10.6%+17.5%
Globe-Ing 277A.TJapan$361M-16%+31%34%16.8×-3.6%+31.2%

Questions

Which companies are Nanofilm Technologies International's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Public Policy (PPHC.L), K-Bro Linen (KBL.TO), TECSYS (TCS.TO), Materials Analysis Technology (3587.TWO), Tera Probe (6627.T), Datang Environment Industry (1272.HK), Beijing Kaiwen Education Technology (002659.SZ), Cogstate (CGS.AX).
Is Nanofilm Technologies International expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 24.2× against a peer median of 16.8×, 5th most expensive of 15 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +2%, so the hurdle is +3 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Nanofilm Technologies International stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -51.6% against -10.0% for the median peer; over one year +10.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.