Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › OBL.AX Omni Bridgeway LtdOpen in the cockpit ↗

Omni Bridgeway LtdOBL.AXCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Australia · AUD·Industrials›Miscellaneous Commercial Services
Momentum leader 90
Mkt cap
$367M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
77%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$658,610
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
9.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-10.3 pp
WACC 9.2%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
118 days
4 Mar 2027
Close · AUDA$1.83
1D0.0%
1W+6.1%
1M+21.6%
3M+24.1%
6M+7.7%
YTD+25.3%
1Y+17.3%
ATR %3.2%
52w lowhigh1.9% off high

What Omni Bridgeway does

Employees: 156

Omni Bridgeway at a glance

Size Omni Bridgeway (OBL.AX) is an Australia Industrials company (Miscellaneous Commercial Services) with a market value of $367M, the 302nd largest of 316 Australia companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at A$1.83 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 7.7%, against -22.9% for the median peer and +4.1% for the Australia market (cap-weighted) — 3rd highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 75.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.3%); the operating margin is -14.6% (peer median 6.5%).

Valuation It trades at 9.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 17.8× (2nd cheapest of 15).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 10.3 points below its cost of capital (9.2% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 4 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026OBL.AX 108Peer median 74
Six months, rebased to 100: Omni Bridgeway against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Omni Bridgeway financials

Reported figures in AUD; fiscal year ends 2026-06-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023
RevenueA$96.3MA$96.3MA$55.0MA$71.0MA$11.5M
Revenue growth—+75%-23%+519%—
Gross profitA$56.5MA$56.5MA$26.9Mn/an/a
EBITDAA$25.7MA$25.7M-A$25.8M-A$16.3M-A$86.5M
Net incomeA$53.7MA$53.7MA$350M-A$87.5M-A$31.7M
Free cash flow-A$18.5M-A$18.5MA$17.0M-A$88.0M-A$131M
Capital expenditureA$35.3MA$35.3MA$102MA$153MA$166M
Total debtn/aA$45.3MA$32.5MA$272MA$200M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Omni Bridgeway competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%-20%0%+20%RTNINDIAACRHSP277AOPTROMA38331023950026593011173009483587002887TCS301019MZHPPHCKBLCTDOBL.AX6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Omni Bridgeway is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-50%0%+50%50×100×HSP277AOPT38331023950026593011173587002887TCSMZHPPHCKBLOBL.AXRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Omni Bridgeway is the large dot.

Omni Bridgeway competitors and peer comparison

How Omni Bridgeway compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Omni Bridgeway against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureOBL.AXPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+21.6%-5.2%2nd highest of 21
6-month return+7.7%-22.9%3rd highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-1.9%-46.5%2nd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+75.2%+8.3%2nd highest of 21
Operating margin-14.6%6.5%5th lowest of 20
Forward P/E9.7×17.8×2nd cheapest of 15
ROIC minus cost of capital-10.3 pp-4.3 pp5th lowest of 20
EV / EBITDA25.6×9.8×2nd most expensive of 11
Net debt / EBITDA-2.1×0.4×least indebted of 13

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Omni Bridgeway OBL.AXAustralia$367M+8%+75%-15%9.7×n/an/a
RattanIndia Enterprises RTNINDIA.NSIndia$368M-37%+2%1%n/an/an/a
Axactor ACR.OLNorway$370M-20%-146%n/an/an/an/a
Hargreaves Services HSP.LUnited Kingdom$363M+8%+33%4%18.0×9.2%+11.4%
Globe-Ing 277A.TJapan$361M-16%+31%34%16.8×-3.6%+31.2%
Optima Health OPT.LUnited Kingdom$361M+29%+15%3%18.8×29.6%+1.5%
Roma Green Finance ROMAUnited States$360M-1%-22%-315%n/an/an/a
ECOPRO HN 383310.KSSouth Korea$360M-27%-27%9%17.5×n/an/a
Shin Nippon Biomedical Laboratories 2395.TJapan$360M-5%+2%10%14.5×6.9%+16.6%
Beijing Kaiwen Education Technology 002659.SZChina$376M-22%+7%8%119.7×15.8%+1.5%
Jiayuan Science And Technology 301117.SZChina$358M-57%-41%-67%26.0×n/an/a
Qingdao Greensum Ecology 300948.SZChina$357M-30%+83%-30%n/an/an/a
Materials Analysis Technology 3587.TWOTaiwan$380M-48%+14%14%13.1×-0.3%+12.6%
Tianjin LVYIN Landscape & Ecology Construction 002887.SZChina$354M-41%-8%12%17.1×11.3%-13.0%
TECSYS TCS.TOCanada$381M+2%+10%5%41.3×18.4%+8.9%
Ningbo Color Master Batch 301019.SZChina$354M-31%+14%21%n/a10.4%+1.8%
Nanofilm Technologies International MZH.SISingapore$383M-52%+10%8%24.2×5.6%+2.3%
Avacta AVCT.LUnited Kingdom$352M-24%-100%-27,388%n/an/an/a
Public Policy PPHC.LUnited Kingdom$383M-12%+43%-3%9.0×1.4%+19.6%
K-Bro Linen KBL.TOCanada$384M+5%+47%8%16.9×3.4%+20.9%
Corporate Travel Management CTD.AXAustralia$350M-69%+7%6%19.5×12.0%+30.6%

Questions

Which companies are Omni Bridgeway's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: RattanIndia Enterprises (RTNINDIA.NS), Axactor (ACR.OL), Hargreaves Services (HSP.L), Globe-Ing (277A.T), Optima Health (OPT.L), Roma Green Finance (ROMA), ECOPRO HN (383310.KS), Shin Nippon Biomedical Laboratories (2395.T).
Is Omni Bridgeway expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 9.7× against a peer median of 17.8×, 2nd cheapest of 15 in its peer set.
How has Omni Bridgeway stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +7.7% against -22.9% for the median peer; over one year +17.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.