Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › ROMA Roma Green Finance Limited Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Roma Green Finance Limited Class AROMACompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Industrials›Miscellaneous Commercial Services
Momentum laggard 17
Mkt cap
$360M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
87%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$269,395
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-49.6 pp
WACC 14.7%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · USD$6.05
1D-3.5%
1W-5.9%
1M-29.6%
3M-34.6%
6M-1.0%
YTD+258.0%
1Y+112.3%
ATR %11.4%
Beta1.12
52w lowhigh48.6% off high

What Roma Green Finance does

Employees: 17

Roma Green Finance at a glance

Size Roma Green Finance (ROMA) is a United States Industrials company (Miscellaneous Commercial Services) with a market value of $360M, the 2954th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $6.05 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 1.0%, against -22.1% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 5th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 22.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.5%); the operating margin is -314.9% (peer median 6.5%).

Valuation It trades at 295.4× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 2.9× (2nd most expensive of 20).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 49.6 points below its cost of capital (14.7% WACC).

Relative performance

7510012515011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026ROMA 94Peer median 77
Six months, rebased to 100: Roma Green Finance against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Roma Green Finance financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$1.22M$1.22M$1.57M$1.27M$1.74M
Revenue growth—-22%+24%-27%—
Gross profit$197,346$197,195$577,044$395,127$732,957
EBITDA-$3.82M-$3.82M-$3.66M-$774,500-$168,850
Net income-$3.50M-$3.50M-$3.56M-$746,369-$129,078
Free cash flow-$2.55M-$2.54M-$1.62M-$3.20M$68,900
Capital expenditure$136,560$136,407$0$783$829
Total debtn/a$0$0$0$0

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Roma Green Finance competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%+20%-20%0%+20%OPT277A3833102395301117HSP300948002887301019OBLRTNINDIAACRCTD605155300977620079210752ROMA6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Roma Green Finance is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-100%-50%0%+50%0×1,000×2,000×OPT277A3833102395301117300948002887OBLAVCTROMARevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Roma Green Finance is the large dot.

Roma Green Finance competitors and peer comparison

How Roma Green Finance compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Roma Green Finance against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureROMAPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-29.6%-1.4%lowest of 21
6-month return-1.0%-22.1%5th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-48.6%-42.5%7th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-22.4%+5.5%5th lowest of 21
Operating margin-314.9%6.5%2nd lowest of 20
EV / Sales295.4×2.9×2nd most expensive of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital-49.6 pp-4.5 pplowest of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Roma Green Finance ROMAUnited States$360M-1%-22%-315%295.4×n/an/a
Optima Health OPT.LUnited Kingdom$361M+29%+15%3%2.8×29.6%+1.5%
Globe-Ing 277A.TJapan$361M-16%+31%34%4.4×-3.6%+31.2%
ECOPRO HN 383310.KSSouth Korea$360M-27%-27%9%2.9×n/an/a
Shin Nippon Biomedical Laboratories 2395.TJapan$360M-5%+2%10%2.4×6.9%+16.6%
Jiayuan Science And Technology 301117.SZChina$358M-57%-41%-67%11.6×n/an/a
Hargreaves Services HSP.LUnited Kingdom$363M+8%+33%4%0.8×9.2%+11.4%
Qingdao Greensum Ecology 300948.SZChina$357M-30%+83%-30%14.8×n/an/a
Tianjin LVYIN Landscape & Ecology Construction 002887.SZChina$354M-41%-8%12%6.1×11.3%-13.0%
Ningbo Color Master Batch 301019.SZChina$354M-31%+14%21%4.0×10.4%+1.8%
Omni Bridgeway OBL.AXAustralia$367M+8%+75%-15%6.8×n/an/a
RattanIndia Enterprises RTNINDIA.NSIndia$368M-37%+2%1%0.5×n/an/a
Avacta AVCT.LUnited Kingdom$352M-24%-100%-27,388%2,314.0×n/an/a
Axactor ACR.OLNorway$370M-20%-146%n/an/an/an/a
Corporate Travel Management CTD.AXAustralia$350M-69%+7%6%0.7×12.0%+30.6%
Zhejiang Xidamen New Material 605155.SSChina$349M-23%+4%12%1.9×-0.9%+20.0%
Shenzhen Ridge Technology 300977.SZChina$349M-27%+13%-2%2.7×33.2%-4.0%
Insource 6200.TJapan$347M-1%+7%40%3.0×n/an/a
Takara & 7921.TJapan$346M+23%+4%15%1.1×-11.6%+4.7%
Beijing Kaiwen Education Technology 002659.SZChina$376M-22%+7%8%8.0×15.8%+1.5%
Pico Far East 0752.HKHong Kong$342M-14%+3%6%0.1×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Roma Green Finance's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Optima Health (OPT.L), Globe-Ing (277A.T), ECOPRO HN (383310.KS), Shin Nippon Biomedical Laboratories (2395.T), Jiayuan Science And Technology (301117.SZ), Hargreaves Services (HSP.L), Qingdao Greensum Ecology (300948.SZ), Tianjin LVYIN Landscape & Ecology Construction (002887.SZ).
Is Roma Green Finance expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 295.4× against a peer median of 2.9×, 2nd most expensive of 20 in its peer set.
How has Roma Green Finance stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -1.0% against -22.1% for the median peer; over one year +112.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.