Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 383310.KS ECOPRO HN Co. Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

ECOPRO HN Co. Ltd.383310.KSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

South Korea · KRW·Industrials›Miscellaneous Commercial Services
Momentum strong 68
Mkt cap
$360M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
64%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$3.73M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
17.5×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-4.3 pp
WACC 8.1%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
83 days
28 Jan 2027
Close · KRW₩23,350
1D-9.8%
1W-1.1%
1M-8.2%
3M-2.3%
6M-26.8%
YTD-2.9%
1Y-22.3%
ATR %8.0%
52w lowhigh50.2% off high

What ECOPRO HN does

Employees: 349

ECOPRO HN at a glance

Size ECOPRO HN (383310.KS) is a South Korea Industrials company (Miscellaneous Commercial Services) with a market value of $360M, the 424th largest of 495 South Korea companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₩23,350 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 26.8%, against -21.0% for the median peer and -24.5% for the South Korea market (cap-weighted) — 8th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 26.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.5%); the operating margin is 9.2% (peer median 6.5%).

Valuation It trades at 17.5× forward earnings against a peer median of 17.6× (7th cheapest of 13).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.3 points below its cost of capital (8.1% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 28 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 79383310.KS 71
Six months, rebased to 100: ECOPRO HN against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

ECOPRO HN financials

Reported figures in KRW; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₩154B₩141B₩235B₩229B₩218B
Revenue growth—-40%+2%+5%—
Gross profit₩43.7B₩39.9B₩53.6B₩74.5B₩68.5B
EBITDA₩20.4B₩16.8B₩29.9B₩47.1B₩46.8B
Net income₩15.7B₩13.2B₩21.5B₩33.5B₩32.4B
Free cash flow-₩19.4B-₩36.5B-₩22.2B-₩16.0B-₩6.52B
Capital expenditure₩33.7B₩35.4B₩79.9B₩19.9B₩18.7B
Total debt₩110B₩109B₩113B₩70.9B₩33.1B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

ECOPRO HN competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%+20%-20%0%+20%2395ROMAOPT277A301117300948HSP002887301019OBLRTNINDIACTDACR605155300977620079210026590752383310.KS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. ECOPRO HN is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-50%0%+50%50×100×2395OPT277A301117HSP002887OBL3009776200002659383310.KSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. ECOPRO HN is the large dot.

ECOPRO HN competitors and peer comparison

How ECOPRO HN compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

ECOPRO HN against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure383310.KSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-8.2%-1.4%9th lowest of 21
6-month return-26.8%-21.0%8th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-50.2%-42.5%6th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-26.6%+5.5%4th lowest of 21
Operating margin9.2%6.5%8th highest of 20
Forward P/E17.5×17.6×7th cheapest of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital-4.3 pp-4.6 pp9th highest of 19
EV / EBITDA22.2×7.9×3rd most expensive of 10
Net debt / EBITDA-1.8×-0.8×5th least indebted of 11

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
ECOPRO HN 383310.KSSouth Korea$360M-27%-27%9%17.5×n/an/a
Shin Nippon Biomedical Laboratories 2395.TJapan$360M-5%+2%10%14.5×6.9%+16.6%
Roma Green Finance ROMAUnited States$360M-1%-22%-315%n/an/an/a
Optima Health OPT.LUnited Kingdom$361M+29%+15%3%18.8×29.6%+1.5%
Globe-Ing 277A.TJapan$361M-16%+31%34%16.8×-3.6%+31.2%
Jiayuan Science And Technology 301117.SZChina$358M-57%-41%-67%26.0×n/an/a
Qingdao Greensum Ecology 300948.SZChina$357M-30%+83%-30%n/an/an/a
Hargreaves Services HSP.LUnited Kingdom$363M+8%+33%4%18.0×9.2%+11.4%
Tianjin LVYIN Landscape & Ecology Construction 002887.SZChina$354M-41%-8%12%17.1×11.3%-13.0%
Ningbo Color Master Batch 301019.SZChina$354M-31%+14%21%n/a10.4%+1.8%
Omni Bridgeway OBL.AXAustralia$367M+8%+75%-15%9.7×n/an/a
RattanIndia Enterprises RTNINDIA.NSIndia$368M-37%+2%1%n/an/an/a
Avacta AVCT.LUnited Kingdom$352M-24%-100%-27,388%n/an/an/a
Corporate Travel Management CTD.AXAustralia$350M-69%+7%6%19.5×12.0%+30.6%
Axactor ACR.OLNorway$370M-20%-146%n/an/an/an/a
Zhejiang Xidamen New Material 605155.SSChina$349M-23%+4%12%15.7×-0.9%+20.0%
Shenzhen Ridge Technology 300977.SZChina$349M-27%+13%-2%31.9×33.2%-4.0%
Insource 6200.TJapan$347M-1%+7%40%11.1×n/an/a
Takara & 7921.TJapan$346M+23%+4%15%n/a-11.6%+4.7%
Beijing Kaiwen Education Technology 002659.SZChina$376M-22%+7%8%119.7×15.8%+1.5%
Pico Far East 0752.HKHong Kong$342M-14%+3%6%n/an/an/a

Questions

Which companies are ECOPRO HN's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Shin Nippon Biomedical Laboratories (2395.T), Roma Green Finance (ROMA), Optima Health (OPT.L), Globe-Ing (277A.T), Jiayuan Science And Technology (301117.SZ), Qingdao Greensum Ecology (300948.SZ), Hargreaves Services (HSP.L), Tianjin LVYIN Landscape & Ecology Construction (002887.SZ).
Is ECOPRO HN expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 17.5× against a peer median of 17.6×, 7th cheapest of 13 in its peer set.
How has ECOPRO HN stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -26.8% against -21.0% for the median peer; over one year -22.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.