Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › IRB.NS IRB Infrastructure DevelopersOpen in the cockpit ↗

IRB Infrastructure DevelopersIRB.NSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

India · INR·Construction & Infra›Engineering & Construction

Indian toll-road developer and operator building highways under build-operate-transfer and hybrid annuity models.

≈ An Indian toll-road operator, like a mini TransurbanMomentum weak 23
Mkt cap
$2.18B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
33%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$1.95M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
16.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-4.4 pp
WACC 10.5%
Hurdle
+5 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
Ba2 / —
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
103 days
17 Feb 2027
Close · INR₹17.02
1D-0.9%
1W+8.2%
1M-2.4%
3M-14.6%
6M-21.5%
YTD-19.1%
1Y-23.7%
ATR %3.2%
Beta0.50
52w lowhigh28.9% off high

What IRB Infrastructure Developers does

Indian toll-road developer and operator building highways under build-operate-transfer and hybrid annuity models.

Earns tolls collected from road users on highways it operates under long concessions, plus construction contracts won from highway authorities; revenue per road depends on traffic growth and toll tariffs, which are adjusted yearly with inflation. Many assets sit in a listed pooled vehicle it sponsors, so the company earns fees and distributions.

In one line: An Indian toll-road operator, like a mini Transurban.

Products and services

  • Toll road operations
  • Highway construction (EPC)
  • Infrastructure investment trust

Customers

  • NHAI
  • State road authorities
  • Motorists (toll payers)

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Infrastructure & construction
  • Roads & highways
  • Toll-road BOT/HAM operator

What could go right

  • NHAI highway build-out targets
  • Traffic growth on tolled roads

What could go wrong

  • Traffic/toll revenue risk
  • High leverage on concession assets

Moat: narrow (regulatory licence, installed base). Long-dated concessions provide annuity-like toll cash flow, but bidding is competitive.

Headquarters: Mumbai, India · Founded: 1998 · Employees: 6,278

Named competitors

IRB Infrastructure Developers at a glance

Size IRB Infrastructure Developers (IRB.NS) is an India Industrials company (Engineering & Construction) with a market value of $2.18B, the 356th largest of 1,058 India companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₹17.02 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 21.5%, against -15.4% for the median peer and 0.0% for the India market (cap-weighted) — 7th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 14.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.6%); the operating margin is 26.5% (peer median 6.2%).

Valuation It trades at 16.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 13.5× (8th most expensive of 18).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is +5 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.4 points below its cost of capital (10.5% WACC).

Credit IRB Infrastructure Developers has 1 bond outstanding ($740M), rated Ba2 by the agencies.

Next results Next results expected around 17 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 83IRB.NS 79
Six months, rebased to 100: IRB Infrastructure Developers against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

IRB Infrastructure Developers financials

Reported figures in INR; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₹64.1B₹65.2B₹76.1B₹74.1B₹64.0B
Revenue growth—-14%+3%+16%—
Gross profit₹21.8B₹21.0B₹30.0B₹26.8B₹26.9B
EBITDA₹29.1B₹29.1B₹36.9B₹34.5B₹33.0B
Net income₹9.54B₹8.50B₹64.8B₹6.06B₹7.20B
Free cash flown/a₹9.23B₹7.45B₹26.3B₹6.85B
Capital expendituren/a₹7.32B₹1.99B₹2.39B₹4.31B
Total debtn/a₹200B₹206B₹186B₹167B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

IRB Infrastructure Developers competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-20%0%6691NBCCGRE189305269019809900PAAL-B601827600072WBD1961MNDAFG600629NWH1719KPIL601778IRB.NS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. IRB Infrastructure Developers is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-25%0%+25%+50%20×40×6691NBCCGRE18930526901980PAAL-B601827WBD1961MNDAFG600629NWHIRB.NSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. IRB Infrastructure Developers is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%6691NBCC1980PAAL-B601827WBDMNDAFGNWHKPILHEIJMIRB.NSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. IRB Infrastructure Developers is the large dot.

IRB Infrastructure Developers competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (IRB.NS vs ASHOKA.NS vs LT.NS vs PNCINFRA.NS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
IRB Infrastructure Developers IRB.NS$2.18B-21%-14%27%16.0×9.2%
Ashoka Buildcon ASHOKA.NS$303M-27%-25%19%15.0×-10.6%
Larsen & Toubro LT.NS$59.8B+2%+11%8%27.6×29.7%
PNC Infratech PNCINFRA.NS$354M-42%+2%20%8.6×-16.2%
G R Infraprojects GRINFRA.NS$803M-21%+25%16%8.9×n/a
Dilip Buildcon DBL.NS$688M-17%-19%16%25.7×n/a
H.G. Infra Engineering HGINFRA.NSn/a-36%n/an/an/an/a
KNR Constructions KNRCON.NS$327M-19%-38%25%22.2×n/a

How IRB Infrastructure Developers compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

IRB Infrastructure Developers against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureIRB.NSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-2.4%-5.8%9th highest of 21
6-month return-21.5%-15.4%7th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-28.9%-35.5%8th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-14.2%+7.6%4th lowest of 21
Operating margin26.5%6.2%2nd highest of 21
Forward P/E16.0×13.5×8th most expensive of 18
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)9.2%-2.1%3rd most demanding of 14
Growth delivered (Del g)+4.2%+10.2%3rd lowest of 14
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+5.0 pp-13.1 pp2nd most demanding of 14
ROIC minus cost of capital-4.4 pp+4.4 pp5th lowest of 20
EV / EBITDA7.1×9.3×5th cheapest of 15
Net debt / EBITDA6.2×-0.6×most indebted of 17

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
IRB Infrastructure Developers IRB.NSIndia$2.18B-21%-14%27%16.0×9.2%+4.2%
Yankey Engineering 6691.TWTaiwan$2.16B-16%+63%16%9.7×2.8%+33.1%
Nbcc (india) NBCC.NSIndia$2.23B-19%+4%6%26.0×40.1%+12.9%
Grenergy Renovables GRE.MCSpain$2.24B-40%+8%23%18.9×n/an/a
Penta-Ocean Construction 1893.TJapan$2.25B-29%+7%7%8.9×n/an/a
Kepco E&c 052690.KSSouth Korea$2.07B-61%+8%10%45.6×n/an/a
DAI-DAN 1980.TJapan$2.05B-15%-7%14%10.2×-4.4%+10.2%
Hong Kong Zcloud Technology Construction 9900.HKHong Kong$2.03B+16%-33%0%n/an/an/a
Per Aarsleff Holding A/S PAAL-B.CODenmark$2.02B-6%+14%5%13.4×-7.6%+11.2%
Chongqing Sanfeng Environment 601827.SSChina$2.00B-3%+5%27%10.4×-11.4%+2.4%
CSSC Science & Technology 600072.SSChina$1.99B-35%+8%-37%n/an/an/a
Webuild WBD.MIItaly$2.39B-22%+2%-1%6.5×-2.1%+24.4%
Sanki Engineering 1961.TJapan$1.98B-12%+2%12%11.5×-6.5%+6.0%
Monadelphous MND.AXAustralia$1.98B-4%+29%5%22.7×5.3%+9.7%
AF Gruppen AFG.OLNorway$2.42B+13%+11%5%16.2×-9.7%+3.4%
Arcplus 600629.SSChina$2.43B-17%-25%-3%38.4×n/an/a
NRW NWH.AXAustralia$1.95B-17%+31%6%13.6×8.5%+14.1%
HAZAMA ANDO 1719.TJapan$1.94B-11%+4%8%9.8×-11.7%+4.5%
Kalpataru Projects International KPIL.NSIndia$2.48B+6%+15%6%18.6×14.9%+16.0%
Koninklijke Heijmans HEIJM.ASNetherlands$2.55B-7%+11%6%13.5×3.9%+9.7%
Jinko Power Technology 601778.SSChina$1.86B-49%-25%16%n/an/an/a

IRB Infrastructure Developers bonds and credit

IRB Infrastructure Developers has 1 bond outstanding with $740M face value. The agencies rate it Ba2.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are IRB Infrastructure Developers's main competitors?
Named competitors: Ashoka Buildcon (ASHOKA.NS), Sadbhav Engineering (private or unlisted), Larsen & Toubro (LT.NS), PNC Infratech (PNCINFRA.NS), GR Infraprojects (GRINFRA.NS), Dilip Buildcon (DBL.NS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Yankey Engineering (6691.TW), Nbcc (india) (NBCC.NS), Grenergy Renovables (GRE.MC), Penta-Ocean Construction (1893.T), Kepco E&c (052690.KS), DAI-DAN (1980.T).
Is IRB Infrastructure Developers expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 16.0× against a peer median of 13.5×, 8th most expensive of 18 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is +5 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has IRB Infrastructure Developers stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -21.5% against -15.4% for the median peer; over one year -23.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.