Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › LT.NS Larsen & ToubroOpen in the cockpit ↗

Larsen & ToubroLT.NSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

India · INR·Construction & Infra›Engineering & Construction

India's largest engineering & construction conglomerate, building infrastructure, defence, IT and heavy engineering.

≈ India's Bechtel/Fluor with an IT-services arm attachedMomentum strong 73
Mkt cap
$59.8B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
85%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$93.2M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
27.6×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-4.7 pp
WACC 14.1%
Hurdle
+14 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
89 days
3 Feb 2027
Close · INR₹4,118
1D+1.7%
1W+6.3%
1M+11.2%
3M+1.4%
6M+2.4%
YTD+0.8%
1Y+3.3%
ATR %2.1%
Beta1.38
52w lowhigh7.3% off high

What Larsen & Toubro does

India's largest engineering & construction conglomerate, building infrastructure, defence, IT and heavy engineering.

Earns by building large projects under long-term contracts, booking revenue as work progresses, so the order book and execution speed matter more than any single product. Its IT arms are listed subsidiaries that make it a part-services group, and a large share of new orders now comes from the Middle East. It has no controlling promoter family; the state-owned Life Insurance Corporation is its largest holder.

In one line: India's Bechtel/Fluor with an IT-services arm attached.

Products and services

  • Infrastructure EPC (roads, metros, power)
  • Hydrocarbon & energy EPC
  • Defence & precision engineering
  • IT services (LTIMindtree, LTTS)
  • Realty & financial services

Customers

  • Indian & Middle East governments
  • Public-sector utilities
  • Oil & gas majors
  • Private developers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Diversified engineering conglomerate
  • Engineering, procurement & construction…
  • Infrastructure, hydrocarbon, defence…

What could go right

  • India infrastructure capex cycle
  • Middle East hydrocarbon order wins

What could go wrong

  • Working-capital-heavy EPC model
  • Execution/cost-overrun risk on fixed-price contracts

Moat: narrow (scale, brand, installed base). Scale, execution record and balance sheet let it bid the largest EPC contracts few peers can finance.

Headquarters: Mumbai, India · Founded: 1938 · Employees: 437,442

Named competitors

Larsen & Toubro at a glance

Size Larsen & Toubro (LT.NS) is an India Industrials company (Engineering & Construction) with a market value of $59.8B, the 9th largest of 1,058 India companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₹4,118 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 2.4%, against -12.9% for the median peer and 0.0% for the India market (cap-weighted) — 3rd highest of 17 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 11.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.9%); the operating margin is 8.2% (peer median 9.9%).

Valuation It trades at 27.6× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.2× (3rd most expensive of 16).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 30% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +16%, so the hurdle is +14 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.7 points below its cost of capital (14.1% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 3 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026LT.NS 104Peer median 86
Six months, rebased to 100: Larsen & Toubro against the median of its 16 peers (local-currency closes).

Larsen & Toubro financials

Reported figures in INR; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₹3.01T₹2.86T₹2.55T₹2.21T₹1.83T
Revenue growth—+12%+16%+21%—
Gross profit₹382B₹436B₹400B₹359B₹319B
EBITDA₹290B₹361B₹331B₹301B₹269B
Net income₹192B₹161B₹150B₹131B₹105B
Free cash flown/a₹120B₹35.4B₹129B₹175B
Capital expendituren/a₹48.1B₹44.2B₹45.2B₹41.4B
Total debt₹1.40T₹1.25T₹1.32T₹1.16T₹1.21T

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Larsen & Toubro competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-40%-20%0%+20%DGPWRFERFIX028260HOTOTIS601668EMEACSGEBNCLNXENAPGWSPLT.NS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Larsen & Toubro is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%20×40×DGPWRFERFIX028260HOTOTIS601668EMEACSGEBNENWSP601390LT.NSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Larsen & Toubro is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+10%+20%+30%0%10%20%30%DGPWRFERFIX028260HOTOTISEMEACSGEBNCLNXENAPGWSPLT.NSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Larsen & Toubro is the large dot.

Larsen & Toubro competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (LT.NS vs ADANIENT.NS vs HCC.NS vs NCC.NS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Larsen & Toubro LT.NS$59.8B+2%+11%8%27.6×29.7%
Adani Enterprises ADANIENT.NS$39.3B+9%+37%8%50.6×n/a
Hindustan Construction HCC.NS$500M-26%-21%12%15.0×n/a
NCC NCC.NS$816M-28%-2%8%11.1×n/a
Siemens SIEMENS.NS$13.4B-8%-12%9%72.7×n/a

How Larsen & Toubro compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Larsen & Toubro against its 16 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureLT.NSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+11.2%+3.4%5th highest of 17
6-month return+2.4%-12.9%3rd highest of 17
Distance from 52-week high-7.3%-26.7%highest of 17
Revenue growth (TTM)+11.2%+6.9%6th highest of 17
Operating margin8.2%9.9%8th lowest of 16
Forward P/E27.6×16.2×3rd most expensive of 16
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)29.7%6.1%2nd most demanding of 15
Growth delivered (Del g)+16.1%+11.3%5th highest of 15
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+13.6 pp-4.0 pp2nd most demanding of 15
ROIC minus cost of capital-4.7 pp+2.5 pp3rd lowest of 16
EV / EBITDA21.7×13.7×4th most expensive of 13
Net debt / EBITDA1.5×1.8×7th least indebted of 15

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Larsen & Toubro LT.NSIndia$59.8B+2%+11%8%27.6×29.7%+16.1%
Vinci DG.PAFrance$69.8B-12%+4%12%12.2×-1.5%+11.4%
Quanta Services PWRUnited States$81.5B-27%+37%7%26.4×24.3%+20.5%
Ferrovial FER.MCSpain$42.3B-10%+5%10%55.5×21.9%+8.1%
Comfort Systems USA FIXUnited States$35.6B-48%+51%17%16.2×12.4%+26.1%
Samsung C&t 028260.KSSouth Korea$31.3B-8%+14%8%15.0×5.9%+6.2%
HOCHTIEF Aktiengesellschaft HOT.DEGermany$30.9B-31%+8%4%25.1×2.6%+10.7%
Otis Worldwide OTISUnited States$30.1B+6%+6%15%18.1×2.3%+2.5%
China State Construction Engineering 601668.SSChina$28.3B-4%-9%n/a5.6×n/an/a
Emcor EMEUnited States$26.6B-34%+22%10%15.5×6.2%+14.1%
ACS, Actividades de Construccion y Servicios ACS.MCSpain$26.0B-37%+10%3%20.6×-2.6%+11.2%
Geberit GEBN.SWSwitzerland$22.1B+14%+3%29%29.8×6.6%+1.2%
Cellnex Telecom CLNX.MCSpain$19.6B-7%0%13%n/a29.7%+22.5%
Bouygues EN.PAFrance$18.3B-18%-1%5%12.9×-0.8%+10.4%
APi APGUnited States$17.5B-7%+16%7%20.7×27.8%+17.1%
WSP Global WSP.TOCanada$17.5B-19%+10%10%14.4×0.0%+15.7%
China Railway 601390.SSChina$15.1B-13%-7%4%6.0×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Larsen & Toubro's main competitors?
Named competitors: Adani Enterprises (ADANIENT.NS), Hindustan Construction Company (HCC.NS), NCC Limited (NCC.NS), Siemens India (SIEMENS.NS), Tata Projects (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Vinci (DG.PA), Quanta Services (PWR), Ferrovial (FER.MC), Comfort Systems USA (FIX), Samsung C&t (028260.KS), HOCHTIEF Aktiengesellschaft (HOT.DE).
Is Larsen & Toubro expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 27.6× against a peer median of 16.2×, 3rd most expensive of 16 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 30% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +16%, so the hurdle is +14 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Larsen & Toubro stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +2.4% against -12.9% for the median peer; over one year +3.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.