Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › FER.MC Ferrovial N.V.Open in the cockpit ↗

Ferrovial N.V.FER.MCCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Spain · EUR·Industrials›Engineering & Construction

Global infrastructure company operating toll roads and airports, plus construction and engineering services, now domiciled in the Netherlands.

≈ A Spanish-founded Vinci / Transurban hybridMomentum neutral 52
Mkt cap
$42.3B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
65%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$97.7M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
55.5×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-2.5 pp
WACC 7.4%
Hurdle
+14 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
118 days
4 Mar 2027
Close · EUR€52.78
1D+2.3%
1W+4.1%
1M+19.1%
3M-7.1%
6M-10.2%
YTD-4.6%
1Y-3.9%
ATR %2.7%
52w lowhigh16.9% off high

What Ferrovial does

Global infrastructure company operating toll roads and airports, plus construction and engineering services, now domiciled in the Netherlands.

Earns toll revenue on roads it operates under long concessions, notably Toronto's 407 ETR, with airport stakes paying dividends. Construction brings in much of the revenue but less of the profit. It moved its legal home to the Netherlands in 2023 and added a US listing in 2024.

In one line: A Spanish-founded Vinci / Transurban hybrid.

Products and services

  • Toll roads (managed lanes)
  • Airports
  • Construction (Ferrovial Construction)
  • Energy infrastructure

Customers

  • Drivers/commuters on toll roads
  • Airport passengers
  • Public infrastructure clients

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Infrastructure
  • Toll roads & airports + construction
  • Concessions (toll roads/airports) and…

What could go right

  • US toll-road traffic growth
  • New concession wins

What could go wrong

  • Concession renewal/regulatory risk
  • Construction margin cyclicality

Moat: narrow (regulatory licence, scale, installed base). Long-dated concession contracts for toll roads/airports create durable, licence-based cash flows.

Headquarters: Amsterdam, Netherlands (Spanish-founded) · Founded: 1952 · Employees: 22,609

Named competitors

Ferrovial at a glance

Size Ferrovial (FER.MC) is a Spain Industrials company (Engineering & Construction) with a market value of $42.3B, the 8th largest of 97 Spain companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at €52.78 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 10.2%, against -14.9% for the median peer and +8.2% for the Spain market (cap-weighted) — 8th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 5.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.8%); the operating margin is 10.4% (peer median 7.1%).

Valuation It trades at 55.5× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.2× (most expensive of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 22% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is +14 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.5 points below its cost of capital (7.4% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 4 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026FER.MC 91Peer median 86
Six months, rebased to 100: Ferrovial against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Ferrovial financials

Reported figures in EUR; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue€9.86B€9.63B€9.15B€8.51B€7.55B
Revenue growth—+5%+7%+13%—
Gross profit€1.03B€2.39B€2.28B€2.13B€1.63B
EBITDA€1.55B€1.46B€1.30B€1.04B€658M
Net income€606M€888M€3.24B€460M€127M
Free cash flow€2.06B€1.43B€775M€981M€625M
Capital expenditure€608M€653M€412M€405M€904M
Total debtn/a€10.7B€11.5B€11.6B€11.8B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Ferrovial competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-20%0%+20%FIX028260HOTOTISLT601668EMEACSDGGEBNPWRCLNXENAPGWSP601390MTZ601868FER.MC6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Ferrovial is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%20×40×FIX028260HOTOTISLT601668EMEACSDGGEBNPWRENWSP601390MTZ601868FER.MCRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Ferrovial is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+10%+20%+30%0%10%20%30%FIX028260HOTOTISLTEMEACSDGGEBNPWRCLNXENAPGWSPMTZANAFER.MCGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Ferrovial is the large dot.

Ferrovial competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (FER.MC vs DG.PA vs TCL.AX vs ACS.MC)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Ferrovial FER.MC$42.3B-10%+5%10%55.5×21.9%
Vinci DG.PA$69.8B-12%+4%12%12.2×-1.5%
Transurban TCL.AX$31.6B+1%0%30%84.3×27.8%
ACS, Actividades de Construccion y Servicios ACS.MC$26.0B-37%+10%3%20.6×-2.6%

How Ferrovial compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Ferrovial against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureFER.MCPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+19.1%+2.6%2nd highest of 21
6-month return-10.2%-14.9%8th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-16.9%-31.3%4th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+5.5%+7.8%9th lowest of 21
Operating margin10.4%7.1%6th highest of 20
Forward P/E55.5×16.2×most expensive of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)21.9%6.4%5th most demanding of 17
Growth delivered (Del g)+8.1%+14.9%4th lowest of 17
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+13.9 pp-4.0 ppmost demanding of 17
ROIC minus cost of capital-2.5 pp+0.1 pp7th lowest of 20
EV / EBITDA29.8×12.8×most expensive of 15
Net debt / EBITDA4.4×1.8×4th most indebted of 18

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Ferrovial FER.MCSpain$42.3B-10%+5%10%55.5×21.9%+8.1%
Comfort Systems USA FIXUnited States$35.6B-48%+51%17%16.2×12.4%+26.1%
Samsung C&t 028260.KSSouth Korea$31.3B-8%+14%8%15.0×5.9%+6.2%
HOCHTIEF Aktiengesellschaft HOT.DEGermany$30.9B-31%+8%4%25.1×2.6%+10.7%
Otis Worldwide OTISUnited States$30.1B+6%+6%15%18.1×2.3%+2.5%
Larsen & Toubro LT.NSIndia$59.8B+2%+11%8%27.6×29.7%+16.1%
China State Construction Engineering 601668.SSChina$28.3B-4%-9%n/a5.6×n/an/a
Emcor EMEUnited States$26.6B-34%+22%10%15.5×6.2%+14.1%
ACS, Actividades de Construccion y Servicios ACS.MCSpain$26.0B-37%+10%3%20.6×-2.6%+11.2%
Vinci DG.PAFrance$69.8B-12%+4%12%12.2×-1.5%+11.4%
Geberit GEBN.SWSwitzerland$22.1B+14%+3%29%29.8×6.6%+1.2%
Quanta Services PWRUnited States$81.5B-27%+37%7%26.4×24.3%+20.5%
Cellnex Telecom CLNX.MCSpain$19.6B-7%0%13%n/a29.7%+22.5%
Bouygues EN.PAFrance$18.3B-18%-1%5%12.9×-0.8%+10.4%
APi APGUnited States$17.5B-7%+16%7%20.7×27.8%+17.1%
WSP Global WSP.TOCanada$17.5B-19%+10%10%14.4×0.0%+15.7%
China Railway 601390.SSChina$15.1B-13%-7%4%6.0×n/an/a
MasTec MTZUnited States$14.0B-58%+26%5%15.0×21.6%+17.7%
China Energy Engineering 601868.SSChina$13.6B-18%-5%4%17.9×n/an/a
Acciona ANA.MCSpain$13.4B-16%+8%6%19.8×8.2%+25.6%
China Communications Construction 601800.SSChina$12.8B-12%-4%3%6.8×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Ferrovial's main competitors?
Named competitors: Vinci (DG.PA), Transurban (TCL.AX), ACS (ACS.MC), Atlantia (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Comfort Systems USA (FIX), Samsung C&t (028260.KS), HOCHTIEF Aktiengesellschaft (HOT.DE), Otis Worldwide (OTIS), Larsen & Toubro (LT.NS), China State Construction Engineering (601668.SS).
Is Ferrovial expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 55.5× against a peer median of 16.2×, most expensive of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 22% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is +14 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Ferrovial stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -10.2% against -14.9% for the median peer; over one year -3.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.