Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 1893.T Penta-Ocean Construction Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Penta-Ocean Construction Co., Ltd.1893.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Industrials›Engineering & Construction

Japanese marine civil-engineering specialist in dredging, port construction and land reclamation, with projects across Asia.

≈ Japan's Great Lakes Dredge & Dock, at larger scale with a general-contracting armMomentum laggard 12
Mkt cap
$2.25B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
85%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$15.8M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
8.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+3.2 pp
WACC 6.8%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
3 days
9 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥1,246
1D-7.4%
1W-11.0%
1M-12.3%
3M-16.6%
6M-28.8%
YTD-20.9%
1Y-2.9%
ATR %4.0%
52w lowhigh44.8% off high

What Penta-Ocean Construction does

Japanese marine civil-engineering specialist in dredging, port construction and land reclamation, with projects across Asia.

Wins marine construction projects, such as dredging, harbors and reclamation, by bid and books revenue as work progresses, with its own fleet of dredgers and work vessels. It also builds ordinary buildings in Japan, and overseas jobs in Asia add large but irregular projects.

In one line: Japan's Great Lakes Dredge & Dock, at larger scale with a general-contracting arm.

Products and services

  • Marine/dredging construction
  • Port and harbor infrastructure
  • General building construction

Customers

  • Government port/infrastructure agencies (Japan and
  • Industrial/energy clients

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Construction
  • Marine civil engineering
  • Dredging, port/harbor construction

What could go right

  • Port infrastructure investment in Asia
  • Offshore wind construction demand

What could go wrong

  • Public works budget cyclicality
  • Overseas project execution risk

Moat: narrow (process know-how, installed base). Specialized marine construction equipment and expertise in dredging/reclamation.

Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan · Founded: 1896 · Employees: 3,991

Named competitors

  • Toa Corporation (Construction) 1885.T
  • Great Lakes Dredge & Dock private or unlisted
  • Toyo Construction private or unlisted
  • Fudo Tetra private or unlisted
  • Wakachiku Construction 1888.T
  • DEME Group private or unlisted

Penta-Ocean Construction at a glance

Size Penta-Ocean Construction (1893.T) is a Japan Industrials company (Engineering & Construction) with a market value of $2.25B, the 451st largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥1,246 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 28.8%, against -13.6% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 5th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 7.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.8%); the operating margin is 7.0% (peer median 5.8%).

Valuation It trades at 8.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.5× (3rd cheapest of 19).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.2 points above its cost of capital (6.8% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 9 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 861893.T 71
Six months, rebased to 100: Penta-Ocean Construction against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Penta-Ocean Construction financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥802B¥794B¥727B¥618B¥502B
Revenue growth—+9%+18%+23%—
Gross profit¥84.9B¥83.3B¥47.6B¥53.3B¥26.4B
EBITDA¥67.0B¥65.3B¥30.6B¥36.6B¥11.7B
Net income¥34.9B¥34.7B¥12.5B¥17.9B¥684M
Free cash flown/a-¥27.6B-¥61.5B-¥1.75B¥9.57B
Capital expendituren/a¥95.9B¥38.2B¥10.9B¥10.1B
Total debt¥245B¥196B¥167B¥110B¥93.8B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Penta-Ocean Construction competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-20%0%GRENBCCIRB6691WBDAFG6006290526901980KPIL9900PAAL-B6018276000726008201961MNDGBFTRE1893.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Penta-Ocean Construction is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-25%0%+25%+50%20×40×GRENBCCIRB6691WBDAFG6006290526901980PAAL-B6018276008201961MNDTRE1893.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Penta-Ocean Construction is the large dot.

Penta-Ocean Construction competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (1893.T vs 1885.T vs 1888.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Penta-Ocean Construction 1893.T$2.25B-29%+7%7%8.9×n/a
Toa Corporation (Construction) 1885.T$1.06B-29%+2%7%9.1×-12.2%
Wakachiku Construction 1888.Tn/a-9%n/an/an/an/a

How Penta-Ocean Construction compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Penta-Ocean Construction against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure1893.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-12.3%-1.1%6th lowest of 21
6-month return-28.8%-13.6%5th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-44.8%-33.1%4th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+7.4%+6.8%11th highest of 21
Operating margin7.0%5.8%8th highest of 21
Forward P/E8.9×14.5×3rd cheapest of 19
ROIC minus cost of capital+3.2 pp+4.4 pp10th lowest of 20
EV / EBITDA8.2×9.3×6th cheapest of 14
Net debt / EBITDA2.9×-0.5×3rd most indebted of 17

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Penta-Ocean Construction 1893.TJapan$2.25B-29%+7%7%8.9×n/an/a
Grenergy Renovables GRE.MCSpain$2.24B-40%+8%23%18.9×n/an/a
Nbcc (india) NBCC.NSIndia$2.23B-19%+4%6%26.0×40.1%+12.9%
IRB Infrastructure Developers IRB.NSIndia$2.18B-21%-14%27%16.0×9.2%+4.2%
Yankey Engineering 6691.TWTaiwan$2.16B-16%+63%16%9.7×2.8%+33.1%
Webuild WBD.MIItaly$2.39B-22%+2%-1%6.5×-2.1%+24.4%
AF Gruppen AFG.OLNorway$2.42B+13%+11%5%16.2×-9.7%+3.4%
Arcplus 600629.SSChina$2.43B-17%-25%-3%38.4×n/an/a
Kepco E&c 052690.KSSouth Korea$2.07B-61%+8%10%45.6×n/an/a
DAI-DAN 1980.TJapan$2.05B-15%-7%14%10.2×-4.4%+10.2%
Kalpataru Projects International KPIL.NSIndia$2.48B+6%+15%6%18.6×14.9%+16.0%
Hong Kong Zcloud Technology Construction 9900.HKHong Kong$2.03B+16%-33%0%n/an/an/a
Per Aarsleff Holding A/S PAAL-B.CODenmark$2.02B-6%+14%5%13.4×-7.6%+11.2%
Chongqing Sanfeng Environment 601827.SSChina$2.00B-3%+5%27%10.4×-11.4%+2.4%
Koninklijke Heijmans HEIJM.ASNetherlands$2.55B-7%+11%6%13.5×3.9%+9.7%
CSSC Science & Technology 600072.SSChina$1.99B-35%+8%-37%n/an/an/a
Shanghai Tunnel Engineering 600820.SSChina$2.56B-9%-9%6%8.0×-0.6%+1.4%
Sanki Engineering 1961.TJapan$1.98B-12%+2%12%11.5×-6.5%+6.0%
Monadelphous MND.AXAustralia$1.98B-4%+29%5%22.7×5.3%+9.7%
Bilfinger GBF.DEGermany$2.57B-31%+6%5%15.5×-6.7%+9.4%
Tecnicas Reunidas TRE.MCSpain$2.57B-5%+33%4%13.5×-2.5%+12.9%

Questions

Who are Penta-Ocean Construction's main competitors?
Named competitors: Toa Corporation (Construction) (1885.T), Great Lakes Dredge & Dock (private or unlisted), Toyo Construction (private or unlisted), Fudo Tetra (private or unlisted), Wakachiku Construction (1888.T), DEME Group (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Grenergy Renovables (GRE.MC), Nbcc (india) (NBCC.NS), IRB Infrastructure Developers (IRB.NS), Yankey Engineering (6691.TW), Webuild (WBD.MI), AF Gruppen (AFG.OL).
Is Penta-Ocean Construction expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 8.9× against a peer median of 14.5×, 3rd cheapest of 19 in its peer set.
How has Penta-Ocean Construction stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -28.8% against -13.6% for the median peer; over one year -2.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.