Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › DBL.NS Dilip Buildcon Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Dilip Buildcon Ltd.DBL.NSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

India · INR·Construction & Infra›Engineering & Construction
Momentum weak 30
Mkt cap
$688M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
24%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$476,914
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
25.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+2.9 pp
WACC 11.9%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · INR₹399.75
1D+0.7%
1W+6.4%
1M-2.3%
3M-12.2%
6M-16.9%
YTD-16.2%
1Y-19.3%
ATR %3.4%
Beta0.84
52w lowhigh24.3% off high

What Dilip Buildcon does

Employees: 20,341

Dilip Buildcon at a glance

Size Dilip Buildcon (DBL.NS) is an India Industrials company (Engineering & Construction) with a market value of $688M, the 727th largest of 1,058 India companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₹399.75 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 16.9%, against -8.7% for the median peer and 0.0% for the India market (cap-weighted) — 9th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 18.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +13.9%); the operating margin is 15.8% (peer median 8.3%).

Valuation It trades at 25.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.4× (2nd most expensive of 10).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.9 points above its cost of capital (11.9% WACC).

Relative performance

809010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 92DBL.NS 83
Six months, rebased to 100: Dilip Buildcon against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Dilip Buildcon financials

Reported figures in INR; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₹87.4B₹89.8B₹107B₹120B₹106B
Revenue growth—-16%-11%+13%—
Gross profit₹17.6B₹19.0B₹16.4B₹14.3B₹8.55B
EBITDA₹16.7B₹19.8B₹15.5B₹14.1B₹9.49B
Net income₹11.9B₹13.0B₹6.41B₹1.94B₹9.35M
Free cash flown/a-₹33.0B-₹52.5B-₹53.7B-₹19.4B
Capital expendituren/a₹32.4B₹42.7B₹55.5B₹39.2B
Total debtn/a₹80.4B₹95.3B₹72.5B₹66.8B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Dilip Buildcon competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-20%0%CDNL193925350023755911301115300692603887CEIGALL001210F9D0024821871CLOUD1965MG600284BWMNISGEC300388DBL.NS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Dilip Buildcon is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%0×50×100×CDNL5911301115CEIGALLF9DCLOUDMGDBL.NSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Dilip Buildcon is the large dot.

Dilip Buildcon competitors and peer comparison

How Dilip Buildcon compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Dilip Buildcon against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureDBL.NSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-2.3%-3.4%9th highest of 21
6-month return-16.9%-8.7%9th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-24.3%-32.3%10th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-18.8%+13.9%2nd lowest of 21
Operating margin15.8%8.3%4th highest of 21
Forward P/E25.7×14.4×2nd most expensive of 10
ROIC minus cost of capital+2.9 pp+0.5 pp8th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA3.9×9.7×cheapest of 13
Net debt / EBITDA4.6×0.3×3rd most indebted of 13

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Dilip Buildcon DBL.NSIndia$688M-17%-19%16%25.7×n/an/a
Cardinal Infrastructure CDNLUnited States$691M-73%+90%8%6.8×n/an/a
Yondenko 1939.TJapan$685M+10%+7%11%n/a1.1%+2.1%
Da-Cin Construction 2535.TWTaiwan$693M+23%+36%8%n/a-10.6%+7.9%
Zhejiang Yasha Decoration 002375.SZChina$695M-16%-25%6%n/a-0.2%-3.3%
Yokogawa Bridge 5911.TJapan$679M-6%+4%8%12.9×-12.8%+1.1%
United Testing Inspection And Certification Technology 301115.SZChina$702M+22%+5%-1%135.5×n/an/a
Anhui Orivie Technology 300692.SZChina$702M-7%-6%21%n/a10.9%+0.1%
Shanghai CDXJ Digital Technology 603887.SSChina$705M-49%+79%3%n/an/an/a
Ceigall India CEIGALL.NSIndia$708M+5%+20%13%18.5×n/an/a
Kingfore Energy 001210.SZChina$662M+32%+15%12%n/a13.4%+9.6%
Boustead Singapore F9D.SISingapore$662M-35%+18%12%9.3×-11.4%-1.9%
Shenzhen Grandland 002482.SZChina$658M-32%+46%-4%n/a24.9%-33.5%
PS Construction 1871.TJapan$656M-17%+6%9%n/an/an/a
Cloudberry Clean Energy CLOUD.OLNorway$645M+2%+79%14%14.4×41.7%+168.9%
Techno Ryowa 1965.TJapan$644M+12%+14%16%n/a-11.0%+12.5%
Mistras MGUnited States$642M+14%+5%7%16.4×7.6%+4.1%
Shanghai Pudong Construction 600284.SSChina$739M-28%-17%1%n/an/an/a
Bowman Consulting BWMNUnited States$745M-19%+14%5%18.8×30.3%+32.1%
ISGEC Heavy Engineering ISGEC.NSIndia$746M-11%+21%6%n/a22.1%+5.0%
Cecep Guozhen Environmental Protection Technology 300388.SZChina$632M-22%+5%18%11.8×-2.0%-1.0%

Questions

Which companies are Dilip Buildcon's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Cardinal Infrastructure (CDNL), Yondenko (1939.T), Da-Cin Construction (2535.TW), Zhejiang Yasha Decoration (002375.SZ), Yokogawa Bridge (5911.T), United Testing Inspection And Certification Technology (301115.SZ), Anhui Orivie Technology (300692.SZ), Shanghai CDXJ Digital Technology (603887.SS).
Is Dilip Buildcon expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 25.7× against a peer median of 14.4×, 2nd most expensive of 10 in its peer set.
How has Dilip Buildcon stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -16.9% against -8.7% for the median peer; over one year -19.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.