Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › BWMN Bowman Consulting Group, Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Bowman Consulting Group, Ltd.BWMNCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Industrials›Engineering & Construction
Momentum weak 26
Mkt cap
$745M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
81%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$4.13M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
18.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-6.6 pp
WACC 10.4%
Hurdle
-2 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
5 days
11 Nov 2026
Close · USD$27.23
1Dn/a
1W+1.4%
1M-2.4%
3M-21.6%
6M-18.8%
YTD-17.5%
1Y-19.9%
ATR %4.2%
Beta1.71
52w lowhigh40.6% off high

What Bowman Consulting does

Employees: 2,300

Bowman Consulting at a glance

Size Bowman Consulting (BWMN) is a United States Industrials company (Engineering & Construction) with a market value of $745M, the 2440th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $27.23 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 18.8%, against -14.1% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 7th lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 14.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +11.1%); the operating margin is 4.8% (peer median 9.1%).

Valuation It trades at 18.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 13.9× (3rd most expensive of 14).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 30% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +32%, so the hurdle is -2 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 6.6 points below its cost of capital (10.4% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $442M at 30 Sep 2026, up 32% on a year earlier — 0.8 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Short interest Short interest is 2.9% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 11 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

70809010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 85BWMN 77
Six months, rebased to 100: Bowman Consulting against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Bowman Consulting financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$528M$490M$427M$346M$262M
Revenue growth—+15%+23%+32%—
Gross profit$251M$234M$195M$157M$123M
EBITDA$56.2M$47.7M$25.4M$17.7M$17.3M
Net income$6.88M$12.2M$2.80M-$6.62M$4.22M
Free cash flow$11.9M$33.4M$23.7M$9.63M$8.27M
Capital expenditure$11.3M$2.76M$3.55M$2.09M$902,000
Total debt$285M$242M$150M$141M$81.4M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Bowman Consulting competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-75%-50%-25%0%+25%-40%-20%0%ISGEC6033126002840972301982SXE1879POWERMECHGMRP&UICEIGALL603887300692301115253507371952CDNLBWMN6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Bowman Consulting is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+25%+50%+75%0×50×100×6033120972301982SXEPOWERMECHGMRP&UI301115GRINFRA0737CDNLBWMNRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Bowman Consulting is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%-25%0%25%50%ISGEC6033121982SXE1879FDC300692002375253507371952BWMNGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Bowman Consulting is the large dot.

Bowman Consulting competitors and peer comparison

How Bowman Consulting compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Bowman Consulting against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureBWMNPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-2.4%-6.2%8th highest of 21
6-month return-18.8%-14.1%7th lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-40.6%-31.5%6th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+14.2%+11.1%9th highest of 21
Operating margin4.8%9.1%5th lowest of 21
Forward P/E18.8×13.9×3rd most expensive of 14
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)30.3%-0.2%most demanding of 12
Growth delivered (Del g)+32.1%+6.3%2nd highest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-1.8 pp-8.6 pp5th most demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital-6.6 pp-0.2 pp2nd lowest of 20
EV / EBITDA18.1×10.1×most expensive of 13
Net debt / EBITDA4.9×-0.3×2nd most indebted of 13

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Bowman Consulting BWMNUnited States$745M-19%+14%5%18.8×30.3%+32.1%
ISGEC Heavy Engineering ISGEC.NSIndia$746M-11%+21%6%n/a22.1%+5.0%
Suzhou West Deane New Power Electric 603312.SSChina$750M-18%-8%9%20.2×7.1%+62.0%
Shanghai Pudong Construction 600284.SSChina$739M-28%-17%1%n/an/an/a
Hj Shipbuilding & Construction 097230.KSSouth Korea$752M-61%+27%6%5.7×n/an/a
Hibiya Engineering,Ltd 1982.TJapan$753M-8%+2%12%11.4×-3.4%+5.2%
Southern Cross Electrical Engineering SXE.AXAustralia$755M-14%-10%9%16.9×-4.8%+14.2%
Shinnihon 1879.TJapan$759M+6%+7%14%n/a-21.3%+6.3%
Power Mech Projects POWERMECH.NSIndia$761M-12%+16%10%16.1×n/an/a
GMR Power and Urban Infra GMRP&UI.NSIndia$763M-17%+4%14%14.6×n/an/a
FDC Consolidated FDC.AXAustralia$763Mn/a+13%-1%13.9×-6.2%+12.9%
Ceigall India CEIGALL.NSIndia$708M+5%+20%13%18.5×n/an/a
Shanghai CDXJ Digital Technology 603887.SSChina$705M-49%+79%3%n/an/an/a
Anhui Orivie Technology 300692.SZChina$702M-7%-6%21%n/a10.9%+0.1%
United Testing Inspection And Certification Technology 301115.SZChina$702M+22%+5%-1%135.5×n/an/a
Zhejiang Yasha Decoration 002375.SZChina$695M-16%-25%6%n/a-0.2%-3.3%
Da-Cin Construction 2535.TWTaiwan$693M+23%+36%8%n/a-10.6%+7.9%
G R Infraprojects GRINFRA.NSIndia$803M-21%+25%16%8.9×n/an/a
Shenzhen Investment Holdings Bay Area Development 0737.HKHong Kong$803M-4%+11%30%8.9×14.6%-2.4%
Shin Nippon Air Technologies 1952.TJapan$803M-25%+11%9%8.7×1.3%+7.6%
Cardinal Infrastructure CDNLUnited States$691M-73%+90%8%6.8×n/an/a

Bowman Consulting backlog

Bowman Consulting reported $442M of remaining performance obligations at 30 Sep 2026, up 32% from a year earlier and up 0% from the previous quarter. That is 0.8 years of trailing revenue already under contract. Book-to-bill last quarter: 1.01.

Questions

Which companies are Bowman Consulting's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: ISGEC Heavy Engineering (ISGEC.NS), Suzhou West Deane New Power Electric (603312.SS), Shanghai Pudong Construction (600284.SS), Hj Shipbuilding & Construction (097230.KS), Hibiya Engineering,Ltd (1982.T), Southern Cross Electrical Engineering (SXE.AX), Shinnihon (1879.T), Power Mech Projects (POWERMECH.NS).
Is Bowman Consulting expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 18.8× against a peer median of 13.9×, 3rd most expensive of 14 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 30% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +32%, so the hurdle is -2 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Bowman Consulting stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -18.8% against -14.1% for the median peer; over one year -19.9%.
What is Bowman Consulting's backlog?
Bowman Consulting's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $442M at 30 Sep 2026, +32% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.