Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › FDC.AX FDC Consolidated Holdings Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

FDC Consolidated Holdings Ltd.FDC.AXCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Australia · AUD·Industrials›Engineering & Construction
Mkt cap
$763M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
60%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$845,479
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
13.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
n/a
WACC 15.7%
Hurdle
-19 pp
Req g minus delivered
Close · AUDA$3.41
1D-2.0%
1W-6.3%
1M-13.4%
3M-7.8%
6Mn/a
YTDn/a
1Yn/a
ATR %4.6%
52w lowhigh16.8% off high

What FDC Consolidated does

No business profile yet.

FDC Consolidated at a glance

Size FDC Consolidated (FDC.AX) is an Australia Industrials company (Engineering & Construction) with a market value of $763M, the 216th largest of 316 Australia companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at A$3.41 on 6 Nov 2026.

Growth Revenue grew 12.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +10.2%); the operating margin is -1.3% (peer median 9.4%).

Valuation It trades at 13.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.4× (6th cheapest of 13).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +13%, so the hurdle is -19 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

FDC Consolidated financials

Reported figures in AUD; fiscal year ends 2026-06-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024
RevenueA$1.69BA$1.69BA$1.50BA$1.41B
Revenue growth—+13%+6%—
Gross profit-A$21.7M-A$21.7MA$98.6MA$76.5M
EBITDA-A$19.8M-A$32.9MA$87.6MA$78.4M
Net income-A$58.2M-A$58.2MA$75.8MA$51.6M
Free cash flown/aA$158MA$140Mn/a
Capital expendituren/aA$1.08MA$716,000n/a
Total debtn/aA$4.14MA$3.72Mn/a

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

FDC Consolidated competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%+20%+30%0×50×100×GMRP&UIPOWERMECHSXE1982097230603312BWMNGRINFRA0737CEIGALL301115FDC.AXRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. FDC Consolidated is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%-25%0%25%50%1879SXE1982603312ISGECBWMN07371952603153600106300692FDC.AXGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. FDC Consolidated is the large dot.

FDC Consolidated competitors and peer comparison

How FDC Consolidated compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

FDC Consolidated against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureFDC.AXPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-13.4%-5.7%6th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-16.8%-33.9%5th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+12.9%+10.2%9th highest of 21
Operating margin-1.3%9.4%3rd lowest of 21
Forward P/E13.9×15.4×6th cheapest of 13
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-6.2%7.1%2nd least demanding of 12
Growth delivered (Del g)+12.9%+6.3%4th highest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-19.1 pp-6.3 pp3rd least demanding of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
FDC Consolidated FDC.AXAustralia$763Mn/a+13%-1%13.9×-6.2%+12.9%
GMR Power and Urban Infra GMRP&UI.NSIndia$763M-17%+4%14%14.6×n/an/a
Power Mech Projects POWERMECH.NSIndia$761M-12%+16%10%16.1×n/an/a
Shinnihon 1879.TJapan$759M+6%+7%14%n/a-21.3%+6.3%
Southern Cross Electrical Engineering SXE.AXAustralia$755M-14%-10%9%16.9×-4.8%+14.2%
Hibiya Engineering,Ltd 1982.TJapan$753M-8%+2%12%11.4×-3.4%+5.2%
Hj Shipbuilding & Construction 097230.KSSouth Korea$752M-61%+27%6%5.7×n/an/a
Suzhou West Deane New Power Electric 603312.SSChina$750M-18%-8%9%20.2×7.1%+62.0%
ISGEC Heavy Engineering ISGEC.NSIndia$746M-11%+21%6%n/a22.1%+5.0%
Bowman Consulting BWMNUnited States$745M-19%+14%5%18.8×30.3%+32.1%
Shanghai Pudong Construction 600284.SSChina$739M-28%-17%1%n/an/an/a
G R Infraprojects GRINFRA.NSIndia$803M-21%+25%16%8.9×n/an/a
Shenzhen Investment Holdings Bay Area Development 0737.HKHong Kong$803M-4%+11%30%8.9×14.6%-2.4%
Shin Nippon Air Technologies 1952.TJapan$803M-25%+11%9%8.7×1.3%+7.6%
Shanghai Research Institute of Building Sciences 603153.SSChina$820M-22%+10%8%n/a-6.2%+12.6%
Chongqing Road & Bridge 600106.SSChina$821M-31%-10%65%n/a32.7%-11.6%
Ceigall India CEIGALL.NSIndia$708M+5%+20%13%18.5×n/an/a
Shanghai CDXJ Digital Technology 603887.SSChina$705M-49%+79%3%n/an/an/a
Anhui Orivie Technology 300692.SZChina$702M-7%-6%21%n/a10.9%+0.1%
United Testing Inspection And Certification Technology 301115.SZChina$702M+22%+5%-1%135.5×n/an/a
Falcon's Beyond Global FBYDUnited States$831M-41%+181%-67%n/an/an/a

Questions

Which companies are FDC Consolidated's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: GMR Power and Urban Infra (GMRP&UI.NS), Power Mech Projects (POWERMECH.NS), Shinnihon (1879.T), Southern Cross Electrical Engineering (SXE.AX), Hibiya Engineering,Ltd (1982.T), Hj Shipbuilding & Construction (097230.KS), Suzhou West Deane New Power Electric (603312.SS), ISGEC Heavy Engineering (ISGEC.NS).
Is FDC Consolidated expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 13.9× against a peer median of 15.4×, 6th cheapest of 13 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +13%, so the hurdle is -19 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.