Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 0737.HK Shenzhen Investment Holdings Bay Area Development Company LimitedOpen in the cockpit ↗

Shenzhen Investment Holdings Bay Area Development Company Limited0737.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Industrials›Engineering & Construction
Momentum strong 76
Mkt cap
$803M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
8%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$30,771
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
8.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-4.3 pp
WACC 5.8%
Hurdle
+17 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
138 days
24 Mar 2027
Close · HKDHK$1.89
1D0.0%
1W-1.8%
1M+0.3%
3M+1.1%
6M-3.6%
YTD+1.6%
1Y+3.9%
ATR %1.5%
52w lowhigh6.2% off high

What Shenzhen Investment Holdings Bay Area Development does

Employees: 549

Shenzhen Investment Holdings Bay Area Development at a glance

Size Shenzhen Investment Holdings Bay Area Development (0737.HK) is a Hong Kong Industrials company (Engineering & Construction) with a market value of $803M, the 645th largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$1.89 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 3.6%, against -19.4% for the median peer and -13.4% for the Hong Kong market (cap-weighted) — 4th highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 10.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +3.0%); the operating margin is 29.6% (peer median 9.4%).

Valuation It trades at 8.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 13.9× (4th cheapest of 14).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 15% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -2%, so the hurdle is +17 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.3 points below its cost of capital (5.8% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 24 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20260737.HK 97Peer median 80
Six months, rebased to 100: Shenzhen Investment Holdings Bay Area Development against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Shenzhen Investment Holdings Bay Area Development financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$949MHK$853MHK$954MHK$1.04BHK$918M
Revenue growth—-11%-9%+14%—
Gross profitHK$356MHK$333MHK$374MHK$332MHK$221M
EBITDAn/aHK$632MHK$627MHK$525MHK$345M
Net incomeHK$572MHK$507MHK$500MHK$584MHK$324M
Free cash flown/aHK$780MHK$312MHK$436MHK$770M
Capital expendituren/aHK$23.0MHK$298MHK$341MHK$370M
Total debtHK$5.46BHK$5.40BHK$4.83BHK$4.45BHK$4.47B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Shenzhen Investment Holdings Bay Area Development competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%+20%-20%0%+20%GRINFRA1952603153600106FBYDTSK1835AFCONSGMRP&UIPOWERMECH1879603257SXE1982097230002307NXT0737.HK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Shenzhen Investment Holdings Bay Area Development is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-25%0%+25%+50%+75%10×20×GRINFRA19521835AFCONSFDCGMRP&UIPOWERMECH603257SXE1982097230603312NXT0737.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Shenzhen Investment Holdings Bay Area Development is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%-25%0%25%50%1952603153600106TSK1835FDC18796032576033120737.HKGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Shenzhen Investment Holdings Bay Area Development is the large dot.

Shenzhen Investment Holdings Bay Area Development competitors and peer comparison

How Shenzhen Investment Holdings Bay Area Development compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Shenzhen Investment Holdings Bay Area Development against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure0737.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+0.3%-10.0%4th highest of 21
6-month return-3.6%-19.4%4th highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-6.2%-34.4%2nd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+10.8%+3.0%8th highest of 21
Operating margin29.6%9.4%2nd highest of 21
Forward P/E8.9×13.9×4th cheapest of 14
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)14.6%-3.4%3rd most demanding of 12
Growth delivered (Del g)-2.4%+6.3%2nd lowest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+17.1 pp-15.8 pp2nd most demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital-4.3 pp+3.5 pp6th lowest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Shenzhen Investment Holdings Bay Area Development 0737.HKHong Kong$803M-4%+11%30%8.9×14.6%-2.4%
G R Infraprojects GRINFRA.NSIndia$803M-21%+25%16%8.9×n/an/a
Shin Nippon Air Technologies 1952.TJapan$803M-25%+11%9%8.7×1.3%+7.6%
Shanghai Research Institute of Building Sciences 603153.SSChina$820M-22%+10%8%n/a-6.2%+12.6%
Chongqing Road & Bridge 600106.SSChina$821M-31%-10%65%n/a32.7%-11.6%
Falcon's Beyond Global FBYDUnited States$831M-41%+181%-67%n/an/an/a
TSK Electronica y Electricidad TSK.MCSpain$831M+10%+1%6%n/a9.9%+0.9%
Totetsu Kogyo 1835.TJapan$841M-30%0%11%9.9×-11.6%+4.2%
Afcons Infrastructure AFCONS.NSIndia$841M-36%-15%4%25.2×n/an/a
FDC Consolidated FDC.AXAustralia$763Mn/a+13%-1%13.9×-6.2%+12.9%
GMR Power and Urban Infra GMRP&UI.NSIndia$763M-17%+4%14%14.6×n/an/a
Power Mech Projects POWERMECH.NSIndia$761M-12%+16%10%16.1×n/an/a
Shinnihon 1879.TJapan$759M+6%+7%14%n/a-21.3%+6.3%
China Nerin Engineering 603257.SSChina$851M-21%-21%10%23.4×15.4%+5.6%
Southern Cross Electrical Engineering SXE.AXAustralia$755M-14%-10%9%16.9×-4.8%+14.2%
Hibiya Engineering,Ltd 1982.TJapan$753M-8%+2%12%11.4×-3.4%+5.2%
Hj Shipbuilding & Construction 097230.KSSouth Korea$752M-61%+27%6%5.7×n/an/a
Suzhou West Deane New Power Electric 603312.SSChina$750M-18%-8%9%20.2×7.1%+62.0%
Xinjiang Beixin Road & Bridge 002307.SZChina$861M-19%-22%8%n/an/an/a
Beijing New Space Technology 605178.SSChina$861M-18%0%-51%n/an/an/a
Next Geosolutions Europe NXT.MIItaly$861M+22%+68%17%12.7×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Shenzhen Investment Holdings Bay Area Development's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: G R Infraprojects (GRINFRA.NS), Shin Nippon Air Technologies (1952.T), Shanghai Research Institute of Building Sciences (603153.SS), Chongqing Road & Bridge (600106.SS), Falcon's Beyond Global (FBYD), TSK Electronica y Electricidad (TSK.MC), Totetsu Kogyo (1835.T), Afcons Infrastructure (AFCONS.NS).
Is Shenzhen Investment Holdings Bay Area Development expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 8.9× against a peer median of 13.9×, 4th cheapest of 14 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 15% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -2%, so the hurdle is +17 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Shenzhen Investment Holdings Bay Area Development stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -3.6% against -19.4% for the median peer; over one year +3.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.